Re: wpa_supplicant does not create pidfile

2010-09-06 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Friday, August 27, 2010 09:42:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:36, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > > On 27/08/2010 09:28, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 19:50, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >>> wpa_supplicant doesn't create the pidfile if the target directory

Re: Tuning the scheduler? Desktop with a CPU-intensive task becomes rapidly unusable.

2010-09-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 07/09/2010 08:54 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > Can someone explain exactly what this sysctl does? The description is > only useful if you have familiarity with the scheduler internals: > > $ sysctl -d kern.sched.preempt_thresh > kern.sched.preempt_thresh: Min priority for preemption, l

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 06/09/2010 20:12 Olivier Smedts said the following: > Here is mine : no difference before and after the patch : Thanks! [snip] > The only thing I noticed is this, after the patch : > ada1 at ahcich1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 > ada1: ATA-7 SATA 2.x device > ada1: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA

Re: Tuning the scheduler? Desktop with a CPU-intensive task becomes rapidly unusable.

2010-09-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:05:53PM -0400, jhell wrote: > On 09/03/2010 20:14, David Xu wrote: > > jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: > >> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> > >> > >>> on 02/09/2010 12:08 jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk said the following: > >>> > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Vora

Re: Tuning the scheduler? Desktop with a CPU-intensive task becomes rapidly unusable.

2010-09-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 04/09/2010 03:14 David Xu said the following: > I think sysctl kern.sched.preempt_thresh is too low, default is only 64. I > always tune > it up to 200 on my desktop machine which is running gnome and other GUI > applications, > for a heavy GUI deskkop, I would tune it up to 224 to get better r

[Wichtig] Haben Sie verglichen, Kundennummer KK-57776?

2010-09-06 Thread Anja Schmidt
Guten Tag Kundennummer KK-57776, ich habe Sie vor ein paar Tagen schon einmal angeschrieben. Es ist derzeit wichtig, dass Sie Ihren Krankenkassentarif überprüfen. Verpassen Sie die Wechsel-Frist, bleiben Sie in Ihrem teuren Vertrag für ein weiteres Jahr. Mit unserem kostenlosen Vergeich finde

Re: 8.1 stable ar9285 ath0 problem

2010-09-06 Thread FOSS Deluxe
Hey Chadd, how is the codin' goin' on there bud? I was browsing through the NetBSD forums and those guys seem to have an ar9285 driver working by looking around in the forums. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma

Re: Broadcom 4315 not working

2010-09-06 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:44:10AM +0400, Baby Boy wrote: > Hi. > > WiFi BCM4315 not working. Please help me. > > --- > = 1 > --- > # uname -a > FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0 r211965: Sun Aug 29 22:18:05 > MSD 2010 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > # cd /usr

Re: Tuning the scheduler? Desktop with a CPU-intensive task becomes rapidly unusable.

2010-09-06 Thread jhell
On 09/03/2010 20:14, David Xu wrote: > jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> >>> on 02/09/2010 12:08 jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk said the following: >>> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk w

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-06 Thread Jack Vogel
In the future make sure that you put E1000 or EM in the title otherwise I might miss it, fortunately I looked at this :) I'm on a holiday weekend, I will investigate this tomorrow. Jack On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Gareth de Vaux wrote: > Hi all, I moved from 8.0-RELEASE to last week's -ST

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Chip Camden on Monday, 06 September 2010: > > OK, I'll try it out too then. Here are the only differences before/after the patch on my system: 5c6 < FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #50: Sun Sep 5 13:08:14 PDT 2010 --- > FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #51: Mon Sep 6 09:10:35 PDT 2010 8c9 < CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Olivier Smedts
2010/9/6 Andriy Gapon : > on 06/09/2010 19:22 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: >> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: Great, thanks!  I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both RELENG_8: >

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 06/09/2010 19:22 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: >>> Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both >>> RELENG_8: >>> >>> - Supermicro X7SBA

MSIX failure

2010-09-06 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I moved from 8.0-RELEASE to last week's -STABLE: $ uname -v FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Thu Sep 2 16:38:02 SAST 2010 r...@x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC and all seems well except my network card is unusable. On boot up: em0: port 0x3040-0x305f mem 0xe320-0xe321,0xe322-0xe3

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > > Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both > > RELENG_8: > > > > - Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10) > > - Supermicro X7SBL-LN2

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Andriy Gapon on Monday, 06 September 2010: > on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following: > >>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should

Re: uma_ref_cnt: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry

2010-09-06 Thread pluknet
On 3 August 2010 15:29, pluknet wrote: > > The second panic seen today on the same box at uma_find_refcnt(). > I'm unsure if it might be caused by Xen hvm setup. Okey, updating the system to 8.1-R seems to fix this. 13 days of uptime since then, while with 8.0 it panicked every 3-4 days. > > db>

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both > RELENG_8: > > - Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10) > - Supermicro X7SBL-LN2 + Intel C2D E6600 (stepping 6) > > I'll make sure to provide what the to

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:56:01PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following: > >>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tre

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following: >>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied >>> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied > > either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c > > depending > > on the desire

Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs

2010-09-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following: > The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied > either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending > on the desired architecture: > http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff I see