Panic with chromium and 8.1-STABLE (Thu Sep 16 09:52:17 BRT 2010)

2010-09-19 Thread Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira
Hi, I've just began trying chrome web browser from http://chromium.hybridsource.org/ but it triggered 2 panics on my 8.1-STABLE system. $ uname -a FreeBSD exxodus.fedaykin.here 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #26: Thu Sep 16 09:52:17 BRT 2010 li...@exxodus:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIOUX a

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

2010-09-19 Thread Henri Hennebert
On 09/19/2010 18:33, Dan Mack wrote: > But I should be able to boot my ZFSv14 root pool using the ZFSv15 build of > FreeBSD, correct? Yes > But the problem scenario would be when I've upgraded by root pool to v15 and > I attempt to boot it with v14 boot loader. At least that is what I think ..

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-19 Thread Mark Kamichoff
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 02:37:21PM -0400, Mark Kamichoff wrote: > I just noticed (well, via a discussion in #ipv6 on freenode) that the > default configure arguments for BIND9 on 8.1 include '--disable-ipv6'. > > % grep CONFIGARGS /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/Makefile > CONFIGARGS='--prefix=/usr' '--i

BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-19 Thread Mark Kamichoff
Hi - I just noticed (well, via a discussion in #ipv6 on freenode) that the default configure arguments for BIND9 on 8.1 include '--disable-ipv6'. % grep CONFIGARGS /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/Makefile CONFIGARGS='--prefix=/usr' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--enable-threads

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon

2010-09-19 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Vadim Goncharov wrote: Which part of "support for the Giant lock *over the network stack* was removed" [emphasis mine] do you not understand? No, component removed was (1), I've underlined. The reason is performance for overall network stack, not ideology. For a practi

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

2010-09-19 Thread Dan Mack
Thanks for the confirmation. This worked fine and I did notice that "zpool upgrade zroot" was nice enough to emit the reminder: gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 da0 which is slightly different than the recipe given in /usr/src/UPDATING: "gpart bootcode -p /boot/g

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

2010-09-19 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 19/09/2010 17:36:01, Dan Mack wrote: > But I should be able to boot my ZFSv14 root pool using the ZFSv15 > build of FreeBSD, correct? But the problem scenario would be when > I've upgraded my root pool to v15 and I attempt to boot it with v14 > boot loader. At least that is what I think ...

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

2010-09-19 Thread Dan Mack
But I should be able to boot my ZFSv14 root pool using the ZFSv15 build of FreeBSD, correct? But the problem scenario would be when I've upgraded by root pool to v15 and I attempt to boot it with v14 boot loader. At least that is what I think ... I guess what I'm getting at is ... you should

Re: MFC of ZFSv15

2010-09-19 Thread Dan Mack
But I should be able to boot my ZFSv14 root pool using the ZFSv15 build of FreeBSD, correct? But the problem scenario would be when I've upgraded my root pool to v15 and I attempt to boot it with v14 boot loader. At least that is what I think ... I guess what I'm getting at is ... you shoul

Re: Serial console problems with stable/8

2010-09-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:19:54PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:44:02PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > > Maybe we should just implement /dev/console in such a way that it can > > never get stuck on dcd. I've seen this break too many times. > > > > Below is an untested pa

em nic getting wedged under high load

2010-09-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
At first we thought it might be the NIC, but we have since changed out the nic, motherboard and power supply. Under high loads, we are seeing the nic become wedged to the point where we have to reboot the box to unwedge it This is an intel board (S3420GPX) from Intel with 8G of RAM, and i5,

Re: Freebsd 8.1 + xorg + radeonhd hang

2010-09-19 Thread O. Hartmann
On 09/19/10 08:20, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2010-Sep-15 22:29:46 +0200, Eivind E wrote: That has crossed my mind aswell, the only thing which makes me doubt it is that after updating X number of months ago (probably about a year and a half), it started to work with no problems whatsoever. Now, af