On 07.10.2010 07:32, Marcus Reid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The process of creating a backup of the ZFS root pool on Solaris
> is simple and straightforward:
>
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/ghzwu?l=en&a=view
>
> So is restoring it on bare metal:
>
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/
Hi, folks,
Currently we have a RAIDZ1 system using 6 x 1TB drives, which we use as
a bacula storage device. We now have another 6 x 1TB drives to increase
capacity. I'd originally planned to just create another zpool and have
two partitions mounted for bacula to store stuff in. However, it wou
Hi,
I got hold of a SunFire X4500 with 48 X 500G disks and thought to try
FreeBSD 8-stable with zfs on it.
I have setup the two boot disks in a zfs mirror and then the rest in
a pool of 6 X raidz2 of 7 disks each.
I have created a 10G file with dd in the second pool, but if I try to read
it with
On 10/07/10 14:15, John Hay wrote:
Hi,
I got hold of a SunFire X4500 with 48 X 500G disks and thought to try
FreeBSD 8-stable with zfs on it.
I have setup the two boot disks in a zfs mirror and then the rest in
a pool of 6 X raidz2 of 7 disks each.
I have created a 10G file with dd in the seco
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 8 stable as of 20101006. It is a dhcp client in a
private local network, and xorg staff is installed. When I tried to use
it from a remote pc with X11-forwarding set, xauth failed to set up
.Xauthority as follows.
/usr/local/bin/xauth: creating new authority file /home/hoge
aka Vadim Goncharov schrieb
mit Datum Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:31:46 +0700 in m2n.fbsd.stable:
|You do not understand the problem. It is not in notices & volunteers, but
|rather in the Project's policy - delete something which could still work.
|Personally, I don't use ISDN, so didn't said anythin
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Peter Much wrote:
> aka Vadim Goncharov schrieb
> mit Datum Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:31:46 +0700 in m2n.fbsd.stable:
>
> |You do not understand the problem. It is not in notices & volunteers, but
> |rather in the Project's policy - delete something which could still wor
Regarding your posting to freebsd-stable.
Probably what you want to do is have the DHCP server send the machine name
when it offers a lease to the client.
-Kurt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:37:52PM +0900, Mamoru Iwaki wrote:
> Now, my question is
>
> Are there good way for dhcp client to set its hostname properly on lease
> time?
Depends on 'properly'.
I've hacked dhclient exit scripts to synthesize a hostname, if one
was not offered by the DHCP server.
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:35:31PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 10/07/10 14:15, John Hay wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I got hold of a SunFire X4500 with 48 X 500G disks and thought to try
> >FreeBSD 8-stable with zfs on it.
> >
> >I have setup the two boot disks in a zfs mirror and then the rest in
> >a p
> From: p...@citylink.dinoex.sub.org (Peter Much)
> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:35:01 GMT
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> aka Vadim Goncharov schrieb
> mit Datum Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:31:46 +0700 in m2n.fbsd.stable:
>
> |You do not understand the problem. It is not in notices & volunte
Hi All,
Do we have any new information about this issue (fixes, work arounds
etc.)? Any input will be highly useful.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-July/057682.html
I am experiencing kind of same problem on FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 i386
2G RAM.
Thanks,
Andriy
___
--On October 7, 2010 17:50:42 +0200 John Hay wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:35:31PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 10/07/10 14:15, John Hay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got hold of a SunFire X4500 with 48 X 500G disks and thought to try
> FreeBSD 8-stable with zfs on it.
>
> I have setup the two boot di
FYI: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.acpi/6440
If you can test and would like to report, please followup to that thread on
acpi@
mailing list. Please do not followup to this post.
Thanks!
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Kurt Alstrup wrote:
Up front disclaimer: I may very well be wrong on this..
At a high-level, I agree with much of what you say. In particular, if
pmap_enter() is applied to a virtual address that is already mapped by a
large page, the reported panic could result. However, barring bugs,
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 06:19:48PM +0200, Goran Lowkrantz wrote:
> --On October 7, 2010 17:50:42 +0200 John Hay wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:35:31PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>On 10/07/10 14:15, John Hay wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I got hold of a SunFire X4500 with 48 X 500G disks a
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 07:31:02PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 06:19:48PM +0200, Goran Lowkrantz wrote:
> > --On October 7, 2010 17:50:42 +0200 John Hay wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:35:31PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > >>On 10/07/10 14:15, John Hay wrote:
> > >>
on 07/10/2010 20:38 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> Isn't slow I/O one of the results of ARC starvation?
Slow I/O can be a result of very many things.
Please remove me from CC, thanks :-)
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing lis
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:37:52 +0900
Mamoru Iwaki <1wk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there good way for dhcp client to set its hostname properly on lease
> time?
Well, you *can* have the dhcp client on FreeBSD send an identifier, and
with that identifier the dhcp server can assign the client a static
Hi!
Does anyone know how to read SFP DDM values using Intel em cards ?
SFP means Small Form Factor Pluggable fiber transceivers.
DDM is Digital Diagnostics Monitoring
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_form-factor_pluggable_transceiver#Digital_Diagnostics_Monitoring
There seems to be a way to r
on 07/10/2010 15:35 Ivan Voras said the following:
> /boot/loader.conf) and 2) disable superpages, they don't get along on a few
> models
> of Opterons (vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled=0 in /boot/loader.conf).
Those who follow know that the issue is supposed to be resolved long ago.
Just in case.
--
Andr
on 07/10/2010 20:31 John Hay said the following:
> Oct 7 17:11:49 thumper1 kernel: mvsch23: EMPTY CRPB 30 (->0) 0 4000
Can you rule out hardware (or driver-level) problems?
E.g. by dd-ing to/from disk directly.
Doing that in parallel on the same and/or different disks.
Running any disk I/O benchm
on 07/10/2010 18:46 Andriy Bakay said the following:
> Hi All,
>
> Do we have any new information about this issue (fixes, work arounds etc.)?
> Any
> input will be highly useful.
Yes, _we_ do. Where have you been? :-)
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-st
I expressed myself incorrectly. Sorry. :-(
Do you Andriy :-) or anybody else from list(s) have more info how to
fix or work around this issue?
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:29:54 +0300, Andriy Gapon
wrote:
> on 07/10/2010 18:46 Andriy Bakay said the following:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Do we have any new inform
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:38:58AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 07:31:02PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 06:19:48PM +0200, Goran Lowkrantz wrote:
> > > --On October 7, 2010 17:50:42 +0200 John Hay wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:35:31
on 07/10/2010 21:47 Andriy Bakay said the following:
> I expressed myself incorrectly. Sorry. :-(
>
> Do you Andriy :-) or anybody else from list(s) have more info how to
> fix or work around this issue?
First, I recommend to try to upgrade to the recent stable/8.
--
Andriy Gapon
__
On 10/07/10 20:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/10/2010 15:35 Ivan Voras said the following:
>> /boot/loader.conf) and 2) disable superpages, they don't get along on a few
>> models
>> of Opterons (vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled=0 in /boot/loader.conf).
>
> Those who follow know that the issue is supposed
on 07/10/2010 13:45 Matthew Seaman said the following:
> However, according to my understanding, if you want to boot from a
> zpool, you can only have one vdev in that pool.
>
> But what exactly does this mean?
Yes, exactly, what does that mean? :)
Where did your understanding come from?
--
And
Hello!
There is a typo in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE Announcement:
# dd if=8.1-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=10240 conv=sync
should be
# dd if=8.1-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=1024k conv=sync
Best regards,
--
0110001101100100
___
f
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 07:59:21PM +, 1 0 wrote:
> There is a typo in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE Announcement:
>
> # dd if=8.1-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=10240 conv=sync
>
> should be
>
> # dd if=8.1-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=1024k conv=sync
AFAIK, this isn't a typo.
Understood, but is it possible to apply "local" ZFS+UFS related
changes? Because STABLE will bring all deltas which was accumulated
since RELEASE and I really concern about stability of this box (which is
router/firewall/mail server). Other people depend on it.
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:20:18 +0300,
On 07/10/2010 21:28:30, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/10/2010 13:45 Matthew Seaman said the following:
>> However, according to my understanding, if you want to boot from a
>> zpool, you can only have one vdev in that pool.
>>
>> But what exactly does this mean?
>
> Yes, exactly, what does that mean
on 08/10/2010 00:04 Andriy Bakay said the following:
> Understood, but is it possible to apply "local" ZFS+UFS related
> changes? Because STABLE will bring all deltas which was accumulated
> since RELEASE and I really concern about stability of this box (which is
> router/firewall/mail server). Oth
Ok. But how stable (production ready) the FreeBSD-8-STABLE is? What is your
opinion?
On 2010-10-07, at 18:12, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/10/2010 00:04 Andriy Bakay said the following:
>> Understood, but is it possible to apply "local" ZFS+UFS related
>> changes? Because STABLE will bring all d
on 08/10/2010 00:35 Matthew Seaman said the following:
> On 07/10/2010 21:28:30, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 07/10/2010 13:45 Matthew Seaman said the following:
>>> However, according to my understanding, if you want to boot from a
>>> zpool, you can only have one vdev in that pool.
>>>
>>> But what
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 07:59:21PM +, 1 0 wrote:
> > There is a typo in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE Announcement:
> >
> > # dd if=8.1-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=10240 conv=sync
> >
> > should be
> >
> > # dd if=8.1-RELEASE-amd64-mem
on 08/10/2010 01:24 Andriy Bakay said the following:
> Ok. But how stable (production ready) the FreeBSD-8-STABLE is? What is your
> opinion?
I use it all the time :-) (And head too).
In general, and this opinion is not only my own, the best FreeBSD "release" is
the latest stable branch.
--
And
37 matches
Mail list logo
