On 10/29/2010 23:27, jhell wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 18:28, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> chmod g+w testdir/ (as superuser, exit again)
>>>
>>
>> ls -ld testdir
>>>
>>
>> drwxrwx--x 2 nobody intern 512 25 Okt 23:03 testdir
>>> ls -l testdir
>>> total 0
>>> -rw-r- 1 nobody intern 0 25 Okt 23:03 test
On 10/25/2010 18:28, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> chmod g+w testdir/ (as superuser, exit again)
>>
>
> ls -ld testdir
>>
>
> drwxrwx--x 2 nobody intern 512 25 Okt 23:03 testdir
>> ls -l testdir
>> total 0
>> -rw-r- 1 nobody intern 0 25 Okt 23:03 testfile
>
>> -> Now editing with vi (as
Thanks Artem,
I'll upgrade to latest stable and zfs 15 tomorrow or Sunday and I'll see if
that makes
it any better. If not I'll also try the chmod operation below.
Thanks for the suggestions. I'll report back here.
Regards,
Rumen Telbizov
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sun Sep 5 00:22:45 PDT 2010
> That's when I csuped and rebuilt world/kernel.
There were a lot of ZFS-related MFCs since then. I'd suggest updating
to the most recent -stable and try again.
I've got another idea that
Hi Artem,
What's really puzzling is why GPT labels disappear in the middle of
> zpool import. I'm fresh out of ideas why that would happen.
>
Thanks for your support anyway. Appreciated.
What FreeBSD version are you running. SVN revision of the sources
> would be good, but date may also work.
>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> You're right. zpool export tank seems to remove the cache file so import has
> nothing to consult so doesn't make any difference.
> I guess my only chance at this point would be to somehow manually edit
> the zpool configuration, via the zpo
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:22:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/10/2010 18:17 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:05:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 29/10/2010 17:53 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> >>> Could it be the priming of the vm object pages
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:38, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
> Running
>> sudo make TARGET_ARCH=amd64 TARGET=amd64 DESTDIR=/usr/x86_64 -j4 buildworld
> on
>> FreeBSD sparcslave.priv.oc.ietfng.org 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #2
>> r214092=9050e7b-dirty: Thu Oct 21 01:25:54 UTC 2010
>> r...@t@sparc
On Friday, October 29, 2010 11:17:50 am Stephen Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel atom mb. When it
> gets to
> where it should identify the drive it hangs.
>
> If I boot with no acpi it does the same thing.
>
> If I boot with safe mode it comes up a
On Friday, October 29, 2010 3:38:50 pm Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
> Running
> > sudo make TARGET_ARCH=amd64 TARGET=amd64 DESTDIR=/usr/x86_64 -j4
buildworld
Maybe just set TARGET and not TARGET_ARCH?
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mail
On Friday, October 29, 2010 4:20:24 pm Stephen Clark wrote:
> > rr232x: RocketRAID 232x controller driver v1.02 (Jan 16 2008 04:16:21)
> > hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Jan 16 2008 04:16:19)
> >
> big snip
> > lo0: bpf attached
> > rr232x: no controller detected.
> > hptrr: no contr
Artem,
> If you have old copy of /boot/zfs/zpool.cache you could try use "zpool
> import -c old-cache-file".
>
Unfortunately I don't :(
I'll make a habit of creating a copy from now on!
>
> I don't think zpool.cache is needed for import. Import should work
> without it just fine. Just remove /
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> The problem I think comes down to what I have written in the zpool.cache
> file.
> It stores the mfid path instead of the gpt/disk one.
> children[0]
> type='disk'
> id=0
> guid=16413940568249554
On 10/29/2010 03:51 PM, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 01:40 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:12:29PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am having a problem gettin
Running
> sudo make TARGET_ARCH=amd64 TARGET=amd64 DESTDIR=/usr/x86_64 -j4 buildworld
on
> FreeBSD sparcslave.priv.oc.ietfng.org 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #2
> r214092=9050e7b-dirty: Thu Oct 21 01:25:54 UTC 2010
> r...@t@sparcslave.priv.oc.ietfng.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SLAVKERN sparc64
wi
On 10/29/2010 01:40 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:12:29PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel at
Hi Artem, everyone,
Thanks once again for your feedback and help.
Here's more information.
# zpool export tank
# ls /dev/gpt
disk-e1:s10 disk-e1:s11 disk-e1:s12 disk-e1:s13
disk-e1:s14 disk-e1:s15 disk-e1:s16 disk-e1:s18
disk-e1:s19 disk-e1:s20 disk-e1:s21 disk-e1:s22
disk-e1:s23 disk-e1:s3 disk
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:06:03PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Probably yes, but have to be careful there.
> First, do vm_page_grab only for UIO_NOCOPY case.
> Second, the first page is already "shared busy" after vm_page_io_start() call
> in
> kern_sendfile; so you might need VM_ALLOC_IGN_SBUSY
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:12:29PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> >>I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel atom mb. When
> >>it gets to where it should identify the drive
On 10/29/2010 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel atom mb. When
it gets to where it should identify the drive it hangs.
Can you try 8.1-RELEASE or an 8.1-STABLE snapshot i
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel atom mb. When
> it gets to where it should identify the drive it hangs.
Can you try 8.1-RELEASE or an 8.1-STABLE snapshot instead? I mean, you
*are* using an Intel Atom system, w
Hello,
I am having a problem getting 6.3 to boot on an intel atom mb. When it
gets to
where it should identify the drive it hangs.
If I boot with no acpi it does the same thing.
If I boot with safe mode it comes up and identifies the drive but then
starts spewing the following errors:
ipfw2 i
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 01:09:39PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:32:04AM -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote:
> > ,--- You/Harald (Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:02:27 +0200) *
> > | What else could I possibly do?
> >
> > | - portmaster www/opera-linuxplugins # installing linux_base-f1
> > Can you reproduce the problem on your system?
>
> I can't reproduce it on mine. Note the resilvering was induced from
> some unrelated disk swaps/tests I was performing, and ftpd is already
> enabled via inetd on this system.
>
> What ZFS tunings have you applied to your system? Can you pro
on 29/10/2010 18:26 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 05:41:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> What svn revision of FreeBSD source tree did you test?
>
> r213936. Revision seems a little old.
>
>> Ah, I think I see what's going on.
>> Either sendfile should (have an o
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 05:41:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> What svn revision of FreeBSD source tree did you test?
r213936. Revision seems a little old.
> Ah, I think I see what's going on.
> Either sendfile should (have an option to) use VOP_GETPAGES to request data
> or ZFS
> mappedread s
on 29/10/2010 18:17 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:05:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 29/10/2010 17:53 Kostik Belousov said the following:
>>> Could it be the priming of the vm object pages content ?
>>
>> Sorry, not familiar with this term.
>> Do you mean pr
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:05:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/10/2010 17:53 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > Could it be the priming of the vm object pages content ?
>
> Sorry, not familiar with this term.
> Do you mean prepopulation of vm object with valid pages?
>
> > Due to doub
on 29/10/2010 17:53 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> Could it be the priming of the vm object pages content ?
Sorry, not familiar with this term.
Do you mean prepopulation of vm object with valid pages?
> Due to double-buffering, and (possibly false) optimization to only
What optimization?
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:31:21PM +0400, Alexander Zagrebin wrote:
> > > I've tried the nginx with
> > > disabled sendfile (the nginx.conf contains "sendfile off;"):
> > >
> > > $ dd if=/dev/random of=test bs=1m count=100
> > > 100+0 records in
> > > 100+0 records out
> > > 104857600 bytes transf
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:31:21PM +0400, Alexander Zagrebin wrote:
> > > I've tried the nginx with
> > > disabled sendfile (the nginx.conf contains "sendfile off;"):
> > >
> > > $ dd if=/dev/random of=test bs=1m count=100
> > > 100+0 records in
> > > 100+0 records out
> > > 104857600 bytes transf
on 29/10/2010 15:36 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 29/10/2010 12:04 Artemiev Igor said the following:
>> Yep, this problem exists. You may workaround it via bumping up
>> net.inet.tcp.sendspace up to 128k. zfs sendfile is very ineffective. I have
>> made a small investigation via DTrace, it
> > I've tried the nginx with
> > disabled sendfile (the nginx.conf contains "sendfile off;"):
> >
> > $ dd if=/dev/random of=test bs=1m count=100
> > 100+0 records in
> > 100+0 records out
> > 104857600 bytes transferred in 5.892504 secs (17795083 bytes/sec)
> > $ fetch -o /dev/null http://localh
Joerg Schilling-3 wrote:
>
> You seem to have a general problem with correct error reporting in SCSI
> with
> your kernel SCSI transport. Please try to contact the maintainer of this
> driver.
>
Thanks for support, I have pinged him already.
ragards,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Hugo Silva wrote:
> Randy Bush wrote:
> > > This is often caused by a combination of two things being enabled
> > > simultaneously: BIOS-level serial console redirection after POST, and
> > > FreeBSD's serial console support.
> >
> > bingo!
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > r
>Ready to start test for failing command? Enter to continue:
>**> Testing for failed SCSI command.
>scgcheck: Input/output error. inquiry: scsi sendcmd: retryable error
>CDB: 12 00 00 FF 24 00
>status: 0x0 (GOOD STATUS)
>cmd finished after 0.013s timeout 40s
>--> SCSI Transpor
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:31:49AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Hugo Silva wrote:
> > Randy Bush wrote:
> > > > This is often caused by a combination of two things being enabled
> > > > simultaneously: BIOS-level serial console redirection after POST, and
> > > > FreeBSD's ser
on 29/10/2010 16:14 Alexander Zagrebin said the following:
>>> I've noticed that ZFS on 8.1-STABLE still has problems with
>> sendfile.
>>
>> Which svn revision, just in case?
>
> 8.1-STABLE
> The source tree was updated 2010-10-27
OK, good.
>>> When accessing a file at first time the transfer
> > I've noticed that ZFS on 8.1-STABLE still has problems with
> sendfile.
>
> Which svn revision, just in case?
8.1-STABLE
The source tree was updated 2010-10-27
> > When accessing a file at first time the transfer speed is
> too low, but
> > on following attempts the transfer speed is norma
on 29/10/2010 12:04 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> Yep, this problem exists. You may workaround it via bumping up
> net.inet.tcp.sendspace up to 128k. zfs sendfile is very ineffective. I have
> made a small investigation via DTrace, it reads MAXBSIZE chunks, but map in vm
> only one page (4K)
on 28/10/2010 08:57 Alexander Zagrebin said the following:
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed that ZFS on 8.1-STABLE still has problems with sendfile.
Which svn revision, just in case?
> When accessing a file at first time the transfer speed is too low, but
> on following attempts the transfer speed is norm
Randy Bush wrote:
This is often caused by a combination of two things being enabled
simultaneously: BIOS-level serial console redirection after POST, and
FreeBSD's serial console support.
bingo!
thanks
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing li
On Friday, October 29, 2010 10:32:52 m...@kmwhite.net wrote:
> I've installed FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE on a Dell Latitude E6410. Most hardware
> works just fine, but I'm having a hell of a time with the wifi. Everytime I
> try to associate with an access point, my terminal replies with:
>
> [..]
> iwn6
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:57:22AM +0400, Alexander Zagrebin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed that ZFS on 8.1-STABLE still has problems with sendfile.
> When accessing a file at first time the transfer speed is too low, but
> on following attempts the transfer speed is normal.
...
> I've tried ftpd a
29.10.10, 07:14, "jhell" :
> On 10/28/2010 03:30, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
> >
> >
> > 28.10.10, 01:54, "Stefan Bethke" :
> >
> >> Am 27.10.2010 um 22:51 schrieb S.N.Grigoriev:
> >>
> >> > Hi list,
> >> >
> >> > I've got very low write speed using ZFS on a SATA disk.
> >> > My HD
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:04:14 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:32:52 -0600
> wrote:
>
>> I've installed FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE on a Dell Latitude E6410. Most
>> hardware works just fine, but I'm having a hell of a time with the
>> wifi. Everytime I try to associate with an access po
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:32:52 -0600
wrote:
> I've installed FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE on a Dell Latitude E6410. Most
> hardware works just fine, but I'm having a hell of a time with the
> wifi. Everytime I try to associate with an access point, my terminal
> replies with:
>
> jarvis# wpa_supplicant -i
I've installed FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE on a Dell Latitude E6410. Most hardware
works just fine, but I'm having a hell of a time with the wifi. Everytime I
try to associate with an access point, my terminal replies with:
jarvis# wpa_supplicant -i iwn0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf
ioctl[SIOCG80211, op 98
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> Hi Artem, everyone,
>
> Thanks for your quick response. Unfortunately I already did try this
> approach.
> Applying -d /dev/gpt only limits the pool to the bare three remaining disks
> which turns
> pool completely unusable (no mfid devices
49 matches
Mail list logo