[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2010-11-20 09:41:08 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-20 09:41:08 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-11-20 09:41:08 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-20 09:41:18 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-20 09:41:18 - /usr/bi

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:30:54AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 11/16/2010 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> On 11/15/2010 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >>> > >>> Patch is at > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/releng_8

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2010-11-20 09:51:50 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-20 09:51:50 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-11-20 09:51:50 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-20 09:52:17 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-20 09:52:17 - /usr/bi

Re: [Call for Tests] PAT issue on Apple hardware

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:54:21 +0100, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 16 November 2010 03:30 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Monday 15 November 2010 08:36 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > Often times I hear complaints like "my Mac hangs after upgrading > to 8.1" or "snapshot CD hangs on my brand new Mac". I kn

problems with network on em

I'm experiencing network interface stalls on em in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (-p1). It looks like the problem could be solved in 8-STABLE, but should I upgrade to it ? Is it OK to try to get only em driver code and recompile as module and try to run it ? sysctl dev.em.2.stats=1: ... em2: Missed Packet

Re: problems with network on em

On 11/20/2010 10:09 AM, rol...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm experiencing network interface stalls on em in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (-p1). > It looks like the problem could be solved in 8-STABLE, but should I upgrade > to it ? > Is it OK to try to get only em driver code and recompile as module and try to >

Re: problems with network on em

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 05:09:28PM +0200, rol...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm experiencing network interface stalls on em in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (-p1). > It looks like the problem could be solved in 8-STABLE, but should I upgrade > to it ? > Is it OK to try to get only em driver code and recompile as mo

Re: problems with network on em

On 2010.11.20, at 17:54, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 05:09:28PM +0200, rol...@gmail.com wrote: >> I'm experiencing network interface stalls on em in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (-p1). >> It looks like the problem could be solved in 8-STABLE, but should I upgrade >> to it ? >> Is it O

Re: problems with network on em

I just got another lockup. It looks like in the time of lockup the number of Ierrs is increasing: NameMtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs IdropOpkts Oerrs Coll em21500 00:14:4f:XX:XX:XX 13060395 18438 0 6579984 1 0 After "ifconfig em2 down;ifconfig

Re: problems with network on em

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 06:38:19PM +0200, Naujikas Rolandas wrote: > I just got another lockup. > It looks like in the time of lockup the number of Ierrs is increasing: > NameMtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs IdropOpkts > Oerrs Coll > em21500 00:14:4f:XX:XX:XX 1

Re: problems with network on em

I'm trying to test with newest version of /sys/dev/e1000 from FreeBSD 8-STABLE. For that I'm using loadable module option, because it is easier to build with minimal changes in kernel source. Only /sys/dev/e1000 and /sys/modules/em need to be updated. Without changes in /sys/modules/em/Makefile it

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2010-11-20 19:28:16 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-20 19:28:16 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-11-20 19:28:16 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-20 19:28:27 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-20 19:28:27 - /usr/bi

Re: problems with network on em

Did you mean the 7.1.7 version from HEAD ? Jack On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Naujikas Rolandas < rolandas.nauji...@mif.vu.lt> wrote: > I'm trying to test with newest version of /sys/dev/e1000 from FreeBSD > 8-STABLE. > For that I'm using loadable module option, because it is easier to buil

Re: problems with network on em

I don't know about version, but I'm using RELENG_8 branch only. It is FreeBSD 8-STABLE also. Regards, Rolandas Naujikas P.S. I just got ~1Gbit/s (125MB/s,115Kpps) forwarding traffic in testing (24 nodes was downloading a file with wget from server from another side of router), but finally ther

Re: problems with network on em

I'd appreciate it if you could try and get the driver from HEAD, I will be putting it into STABLE next week, and it would be nice to see if it fixed your problem. It will build in your STABLE environment just fine, do you know how to do this, if not just say so and I can give you further details.

Re: problems with network on em

When comparing there (in HEAD) I found many changes, most of them are not related with my hardware. Would it compile on FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 ? I could try on secondary router and test it again with 1Gbs traffic. Regards, Rolandas Naujikas On 2010.11.21, at 00:13, Jack Vogel wrote: > I'd appre

ahci+zfs+gvinum will panci on boot

On FreeBSD 8.1-release, I was unable to load ahci without causing a system panic. Since recently going to FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Fri Nov 19 12:17:12 MST, I have been able to boot with ahci loaded as a module but it leaves my two mirrored root-on-zfs main drives as ad devices while attaching to