file (ftp and http).
>
> The effects can be seen here:
> http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/20110101-zfsv28-fbsd/
> the exact moment of the switch can be seen on zfs_mem-week.png, where
> the L2 ARC has been discarded.
>
> What I see:
> - increased CPU load
> - decreased
In setting up tmpfs (so not tmpmfs) on a machine that is using
zfs(v15, zfs v4) on 8.2prerelease I run out of space on the tmpfs when
copying a file of ~4.6 GB file from the zfs-filesystem to the memory
disk. This machine has 8GB of memory backed by swap on the harddisk,
so I expected the file to c
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Please provide output from the following command, as root:
pciconf -lbvc
And only include the bge1 and bge0 devices in your output. Thanks.
This is the output, as root, using the kernel with the 10/7/2010 bge code
(which works for me). I can p
On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
What I see:
- increased CPU load
- decreased L2 ARC hit rate, decreased SSD (ad[46]), therefore increased
hard disk load (IOPS graph)
...
Any ideas on what could cause these? I haven't upgraded
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
> What I see:
> - increased CPU load
> - decreased L2 ARC hit rate, decreased SSD (ad[46]), therefore increased
> hard disk load (IOPS graph)
>
...
> Any ideas on what could cause these? I haven't upgraded the pool version and
> nothing was chang
cting as a file server on
ftp/http/rsync, the content being read only mounted with nullfs in
jails, and the daemons use sendfile (ftp and http).
The effects can be seen here:
http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/20110101-zfsv28-fbsd/
the exact moment of the switch can be seen on zfs_mem-week.png,
On 2 January 2011 02:11, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> I remember getting rather average performance on v14 but Jean-Yves
> reported good performance boosts from upgrading to v15.
that was v28 :)
saw no major difference between v14 and v15.
JY
___
freebsd
This is a home machine so I am afraid I won't have backups in place, if
only because I just won't have another machine with as much disk space.
The data is nothing critically important anyway, movies, music mostly.
My objective here is getting more used to ZFS and seeing how performance
gets.
John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, December 25, 2010 6:43:25 am Miroslav Lachman wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, December 11, 2010 11:51:41 am Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
2010/4/20 Miroslav Lachman<000.f...@quip.cz>:
I have large storage parti
[I'm not sure if -stable is the best list for this but anyway...]
I'm trying to convert an old laptop running FreeBSD 8.0 into a diskless
client (since its internal HDD is growing bad spots faster than I can
repair them). I have it pxebooting nicely and running with an NFS root
but it then report
10 matches
Mail list logo
