On Fri, February 11, 2011 11:12 am, Ted Faber wrote:
> For the last couple weeks (maybe more) I've been having an intermittent
> problem on my Thinkpad T42 where exiting X causes my screen to lock up and the
> system seems to stop doing anything. Lately it's happening about every 3rd
> time.
>
>
On Thu, February 10, 2011 2:47 pm, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Russell Jackson:
>
>> Looks like I should just suck it up and start using the bind97 port.
>>
>
> Or switch to unbound.
Unless you need/allow recursion for your internal || stealth || seconds/slaves
In fact, that's the _only
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:24:27PM -0800, Greg Bonett wrote:
> Thanks for all the help. I've learned some new things, but haven't fixed
> the problem yet.
>
> > 1) Re-enable both CPU cores; I can't see this being responsible for the
> > problem. I do understand the concern over added power draw,
Thanks for all the help. I've learned some new things, but haven't fixed
the problem yet.
> 1) Re-enable both CPU cores; I can't see this being responsible for the
> problem. I do understand the concern over added power draw, but see
> recommendation (4a) below.
I re-enabled all cores but exper
On (10/02/2011 16:56), Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:09:31 +0100
> Attila Nagy wrote:
> > I hope somebody can find the time to look into this, it's pretty
> > annoying...
>
> It's also listed as a bug on OpenSolaris:
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;?bug_id=6804
Hello,
Testing FreeBSD 8.2-RC3 i've seen that documentation with regards to
daily_status_zfs_enable
in periodic.conf(5) is missing. Something like this could be added:
(bool) Set to "YES" if you want to run zpool status -x to check for broken ZFS
pools.
Regards.
Victor.
--
La prueba más fehac
On 11/02/2011, at 21:03, Mark Powell wrote:
>> Can you take a picture of where it hangs? (you will have to host it
>> somewhere though, as the list will reject non text attachments).
>
> Here you go:
>
> http://galatea.salford.ac.uk/aix502/11022011448.jpg
> http://galatea.salford.ac.uk/aix502/1
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Christian Walther wrote:
AFAIK if you have gptzfsboot on your drives it will probe the
partitions on your drives, which can take a while. So if you suspect
ZFS it might really be an option to replace gptzfsboot with gptboot.
I have ufs / so isn't /boot/boot (loaded from
Hi,
On 11 February 2011 11:33, Mark Powell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
[...]
> I suspected BIOS, that's why I was going to get a new motherboard. I've
> always had problems getting gptzfsboot working on this hardware and there
> are no more BIOS updates now. That's why I
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
This is before the kernel boots, correct?
Yep.
Can you take a picture of where it hangs? (you will have to host it
somewhere though, as the list will reject non text attachments).
Here you go:
http://galatea.salford.ac.uk/aix502/11022011448.jpg
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> Or switch to unbound.
^^^
Cute name, but perhaps a tiny bit misleading as to the product's
origin -- the first thing I thought of on seeing a name like
that was the FSF. Not this time: although its development was
commercially sponsored it is BSD-lic
11 matches
Mail list logo
