Hi Jeremy,
>> So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something?
> I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL.
> I would classify this as a bug/oversight that should be properly dealt
> with via an #error statement or similar -- the current result (what
> you've reported) is not acce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Apr 2011, at 17:43, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> Just FYI, I'm in the process of updating svn.FreeBSD.org to latest FreeBSD
> stable/8.
Hey,
Everything should be working again now.
For commit
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
>
> PPS. this now means that one of the last system having it's FreeBSD base
> source controlled by CVS is switched to using SVN...
I think that's ironic or something.
Gordon
___
freebsd-stab
Hey,
Just FYI, I'm in the process of updating svn.FreeBSD.org to latest FreeBSD
stable/8.
The base system is now upgraded, but now I need to recompile ports so to avoid
any interesting mixups while that happens I will disable svn access until all
ports have been recompiled.
I had forgotten it
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 05:52:47AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Jeremy Chadwick, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> > So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something?
>
> I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL.
There's some condi
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> > NO_OPENSSL, no -DHAVE_CRYPTO. No -DHAVE_CRYPTO, no #include
> > hast_checksum.h.
> So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something?
I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL.
I would classify this as
Hi Matthew,
> NO_OPENSSL, no -DHAVE_CRYPTO. No -DHAVE_CRYPTO, no #include
> hast_checksum.h.
So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
