On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 17:35:32 Gardner Bell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:25:26PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 15:15:45 Gardner Bell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Bernhard Schmidt bschm...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 26, 2011
FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report January-March, 2011
Introduction
This report covers FreeBSD-related projects between January and March
2011. It is the first of the four reports planned for 2011. During this
quarter, the work was focused on releasing the new minor versions of
FreeBSD,
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2011, 23:36 +0300 schrieb Mikolaj Golub:
2) There are complaints from watchdog.
what happens, if the watchdog isn't available and one or both nodes are
rebooting or something else?
the other thing what could happen: the connection between the host and
the SAS
hi,
if I remove the SAS cable from the JBOD (connected through a SAS
switch), all disks disappears, that's fine and expected, but if I
reconnect the cable, the disks are not added anymore.
I've red to use camcontrol rescan all, but nothing happens. I don't
get my /dev/da0-47 devices anymore and
hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 14:20 +0200 schrieb Denny Schierz:
I've red to use camcontrol rescan all, but nothing happens. I don't
get my /dev/da0-47 devices anymore and have to reboot the whole machine.
small update: I've tested it again and only some disks appear again, but
not all.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:20:34PM +0200, Denny Schierz wrote:
hi,
if I remove the SAS cable from the JBOD (connected through a SAS
switch), all disks disappears, that's fine and expected, but if I
reconnect the cable, the disks are not added anymore.
I've red to use camcontrol rescan all,
hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 05:57 -0700 schrieb Jeremy Chadwick:
camcontrol reset 0
0:22:0 is available, 0:46:0 not:
root@iscsihead-m:~# camcontrol reset 0:22:0
Reset of 0:22:0 was successful
root@iscsihead-m:~# camcontrol reset 0:46:0
camcontrol: cam_open_btl: no passthrough device
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:05:11 +0200 Denny Schierz wrote:
DS hi,
DS Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2011, 23:36 +0300 schrieb Mikolaj Golub:
2) There are complaints from watchdog.
DS what happens, if the watchdog isn't available and one or both nodes are
DS rebooting or something else?
Without
On 27.04.2011 16:39, Denny Schierz wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 05:57 -0700 schrieb Jeremy Chadwick:
camcontrol reset 0
0:22:0 is available, 0:46:0 not:
root@iscsihead-m:~# camcontrol reset 0:22:0
Reset of 0:22:0 was successful
root@iscsihead-m:~# camcontrol reset 0:46:0
camcontrol:
Hi,
running 8.2-RELEASE-p1 within VMWare ESXi 4.1-u1 I want to use raw
devices as hard disks. I create the devices using this link:
http://www.mattiasholm.com/node/33
I tried 3 different hard drives (Seagate 2x80GB and 1x400GB SATA2)
which are fine on a physical machine. I also ran Seatool many
I'm migrating away from my old pseudo-RAID partitions to GEOM gmirror
and I have some questions on the right way to accomplish this. I've
got two new 1TB disks that I'm setting up for the new mirror, and
unfortunately they're Western Digital drives with 4k sectors that
report themselves as 512b.
Michael Proto wrote:
I'm migrating away from my old pseudo-RAID partitions to GEOM gmirror
and I have some questions on the right way to accomplish this. I've
got two new 1TB disks that I'm setting up for the new mirror, and
unfortunately they're Western Digital drives with 4k sectors that
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Michael Proto wrote:
Am I using the correct process to create this array?
No. While this works with MBR it fails with GPT as GPT and GEOM both
want to use the last sector of the disk.
First create the mirror and after
Michael Proto wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de
wrote:
Michael Proto wrote:
Am I using the correct process to create this array?
No. While this works with MBR it fails with GPT as GPT and GEOM both
want to use the last sector of the disk.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
Michael Proto wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de
wrote:
Michael Proto wrote:
Am I using the correct process to create this array?
No. While this works with MBR it fails with
Helmut 'Ingrid' Schneider wrote:
running 8.2-RELEASE-p1 within VMWare ESXi 4.1-u1 I want to use raw
devices as hard disks. I create the devices using this link:
http://www.mattiasholm.com/node/33
I tried 3 different hard drives (Seagate 2x80GB and 1x400GB SATA2)
which are fine on a
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:35:22PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Michael Proto wrote:
...
gmirror label -v -n -b round-robin gm0p1 /dev/ad4p1
newfs -U -b 32768 -f 4096 -S 4096 /dev/mirror/gm0p1
gmirror label -v -n -b round-robin gm0p2 /dev/ad4p2
newfs -U -b 32768 -f 4096 -S 4096
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Clifton Royston clift...@lava.net wrote:
I don't know; it looks correct to me, but I may be missing something
as I don't currently use gpart.
gmirror (well, really, any GEOM) doesn't play well with GPT due to the
way they store their metadata.
gmirror doesn't
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Clifton Royston clift...@lava.net wrote:
I don't know; it looks correct to me, but I may be missing something
as I don't currently use gpart.
gmirror (well, really, any GEOM) doesn't play
Michael Proto wrote:
What I ultimately decided to do was use fdisk in interactive mode to
manually align 2 4k-boundary MBR partitions
Correct me if I'm wrong but from my point of view there is no need to
fall back to MBR partitions. GPT partitions should be at least as
robust as MBR partitions
Hello Denny, everyone,
I confirm I experience the same behavior with just a SAS expander not via
SAS switch.
I've got no way to get my block device back but reboot. Also identify
function doesn't work
from the OS (no problem via the card BIOS). Don't remember having any luck
with sg3_util
package
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:07:34PM -0700, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
I confirm I experience the same behavior with just a SAS expander not
via SAS switch. I've got no way to get my block device back but
reboot.
I don't mean to sound critical, but why do you guys do this? The reason
I ask: on
22 matches
Mail list logo
