Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
On 02.08.11 12:46, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I am pretty sure UFS does not have this problem. i.e. once you
delete/move the files out of the directory its performance would be
good again.
UFS would be the classic example of poor performance if you
Hi, all,
Am 05.08.2011 um 17:12 schrieb Christian Weisgerber:
Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
On 02.08.11 12:46, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I am pretty sure UFS does not have this problem. i.e. once you
delete/move the files out of the directory its performance would be
good again.
On 06/08/2011, at 5:17, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Am 05.08.2011 um 17:12 schrieb Christian Weisgerber:
Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote:
On 02.08.11 12:46, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I am pretty sure UFS does not have this problem. i.e. once you
delete/move the files out of the directory
On 08/05/2011 20:38, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Ahh, but OP had moved these files away and performance was still poor..
_that_ is the bug.
I'm no file system expert, but it seems to me the key questions are; how
long does it take the system to recover from this condition, and if it's
more than N
On 08/05/11 21:47, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi, all,
Am 05.08.2011 um 17:12 schrieb Christian Weisgerber:
Daniel Kalchevdan...@digsys.bg wrote:
On 02.08.11 12:46, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I am pretty sure UFS does not have this problem. i.e. once you
delete/move the files out of the