On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
> rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
> patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
> for 9/head:
> http://people.freebsd.org/
On 15 Oct 2011, at 14:24, kapral wrote:
> Now i don't see any strange connections established but i had them b4 i
> wrote email i know my browsers connect to strange ip unfortunatly i didn't
> checked a port to whih was connected to but it was from high ports abowe
> 1024 on my local machine
>
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> >
> > Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
> > rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
> > patch a try in orde
I uploaded a patch last night for this issue, it's sitting at
http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/in6.c.diff
--Qing
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
>
> So, this morning I updated to the latest stable/8 on my desktop box as
> is my habit to do about fortnightly. Lo and
Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
for 9/head:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff
for 8:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mari
So, this morning I updated to the latest stable/8 on my desktop box as
is my habit to do about fortnightly. Lo and behold, the jail I had
configured hanging off the loopback interface suddenly stopped being
able to communicate with the rest of the world. For reasons too trivial
to be worth expla
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:50:22 +0200 Stefan Bethke wrote:
SB> Am 15.10.2011 um 09:36 schrieb Mikolaj Golub:
>>
>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:50:32 +0200 Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>
>> SB> I finally figured out why my ports aren't updating anymore: when
>> running portupgrade -a --batch from cron,
Just tried to build a new kernel in 9.0-BETA3 with the IPFIREWALL
option, and found that the build halts with a compiler error. The
error occurs at netinet/ipfw/ip_fw_pfil.c, line 185, where the
compiler complains that the variable "len" is used before
intialization. Problem occurs on both i386
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 04:04:43PM +0200, kapral wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:46:57 -0400, Jason Hellenthal
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 02:39:43PM +0200, kapral wrote:
> > >> it might be caused by insecure
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 04:04:43PM +0200, kapral wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:46:57 -0400, Jason Hellenthal
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 02:39:43PM +0200, kapral wrote:
> >> it might be caused by insecure dns ipv4 because this domain le100
> resolvs
> >> for ip that belong to seedo no
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 02:39:43PM +0200, kapral wrote:
> it might be caused by insecure dns ipv4 because this domain le100 resolvs
> for ip that belong to seedo not to google i dont know i fought seedo is not
> owned by google but i am a newbie sorry for a problem
I would take a educated guess
it might be caused by insecure dns ipv4 because this domain le100 resolvs
for ip that belong to seedo not to google i dont know i fought seedo is not
owned by google but i am a newbie sorry for a problem
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
s-ascii"
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:25:35 +0100 Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>
> AW> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> >> I won't be in a position to create a simpler test case, raise a PR or
> >> try patches till Tues
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 02:24:14PM +0200, kapral wrote:
> Now i don't see any strange connections established but i had them b4 i
> wrote email i know my browsers connect to strange ip unfortunatly i didn't
> checked a port to whih was connected to but it was from high ports abowe
> 1024 on my loca
Now i don't see any strange connections established but i had them b4 i
wrote email i know my browsers connect to strange ip unfortunatly i didn't
checked a port to whih was connected to but it was from high ports abowe
1024 on my local machine
there was no stranege connections to google or other
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 01:49:59PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 15.10.2011 um 12:34 schrieb kapral:
>
> > When I connect with any freebsd 8.2 browsers like epithany konqueror
> > firefox7.0.1 and under open bsd 4.9 with firefox 3.6.13 en i have strange
> > connections too le100.net i checkt
Am 15.10.2011 um 12:34 schrieb kapral:
> When I connect with any freebsd 8.2 browsers like epithany konqueror
> firefox7.0.1 and under open bsd 4.9 with firefox 3.6.13 en i have strange
> connections too le100.net i checkt the ip and this is seedo in germany i
> also have other strange connectio
When I connect with any freebsd 8.2 browsers like epithany konqueror
firefox7.0.1 and under open bsd 4.9 with firefox 3.6.13 en i have strange
connections too le100.net i checkt the ip and this is seedo in germany i
also have other strange connections any idea what to do with this bug ?
_
Am 15.10.2011 um 09:36 schrieb Mikolaj Golub:
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:50:32 +0200 Stefan Bethke wrote:
>
> SB> I finally figured out why my ports aren't updating anymore: when running
> portupgrade -a --batch from cron, stdin is /dev/null, and that produces the
> gobs of ^D in the output, a
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:54 AM, George Kontostanos
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
>> On 12/10/2011 11:24, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:12:55 +0300
>>> George Kontostanos wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Sergey V. Dyatko
>>
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:50:32 +0200 Stefan Bethke wrote:
SB> I finally figured out why my ports aren't updating anymore: when running
portupgrade -a --batch from cron, stdin is /dev/null, and that produces the
gobs of ^D in the output, as well as the script file that portupgrade creates.
What
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:03:37 +0200 Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
JT> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:25:35PM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>> > I won't be in a position to create a simpler test case, raise a PR or
>> > try patches till T
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:25:35 +0100 Adrian Wontroba wrote:
AW> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>> I won't be in a position to create a simpler test case, raise a PR or
>> try patches till Tuesday evening (UK) at the earliest.
AW> So far I have been unable to r
23 matches
Mail list logo
