Re: "File too large" error when appending to a file of 130 MB

2012-02-20 Thread Phil Murray
On 20/02/2012, at 10:36 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi list, > > Can you please Cc: me when replying as I'm not subscribed, thanks. > > I have a problem with procmail which gets a "File too large" error when > it tries to write at the end of some mailbox file. > > Is procmail running from Po

Re: "File too large" error when appending to a file of 130 MB

2012-02-20 Thread Rick Macklem
Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi Rick, > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 07:46:42PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > This is a 8.2 32 bits jail on a 8.2 amd64 host. In the jail, /home > > > is > > > a > > > nullfs mounted ZFS filesystem. The mailbox is not that big: > > > > > > % felucia:jlh$ ls -l Mail/mbox1

Re: disk devices speed is ugly

2012-02-20 Thread Scott Long
On Feb 20, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Alex Samorukov wrote: > On 02/15/2012 05:50 AM, Scott Long wrote: >> >> What would be nice is a generic caching subsystem that any FS can use >> - similar to the old block devices but with hooks to allow the FS to >> request read-ahead, advise of unwanted blocks and

Re: ZFS + nullfs + Linuxulator = panic?

2012-02-20 Thread Paul Mather
On Feb 17, 2012, at 8:27 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:07:46PM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:09:27AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: On Feb 14, 2012, at 7:47 PM, Konstantin Belou

Re: "File too large" error when appending to a file of 130 MB

2012-02-20 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi Rick, On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 07:46:42PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > > This is a 8.2 32 bits jail on a 8.2 amd64 host. In the jail, /home is > > a > > nullfs mounted ZFS filesystem. The mailbox is not that big: > > > > % felucia:jlh$ ls -l Mail/mbox1 > > % -rw---+ 1 jlh jlh 138744672 Feb

FreeBSD 8.3-BETA1 Available...

2012-02-20 Thread Ken Smith
The first BETA build of the 8.3-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, and pc98 architectures. The MD5/SHA256 sums are tacked on to the bottom of this message. The ISO and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images are available here: f

Re: disk devices speed is ugly

2012-02-20 Thread Alex Samorukov
On 02/15/2012 05:50 AM, Scott Long wrote: What would be nice is a generic caching subsystem that any FS can use - similar to the old block devices but with hooks to allow the FS to request read-ahead, advise of unwanted blocks and ability to flush dirty blocks in a requested order with the equiv

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-20 Thread vermaden
Hi, I removed the state_lock and stat_unlock mechanisms as they appeared to be not needed, I have shufled with 3 drives all the time and the 'integrity' has not been lost, at it was a lot faster, because the lock always had to wait for the 'slowest' drive (in term of initializing the device, like

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-20 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:27 PM, vermaden wrote: > written by ${ME} ... > > > First BUG: (not fixed yet, but workaround already is working) > > > > TEST/BUG/CASE: > > Plug in FAT32 and NTFS drives at the same time, when FAT32 device > > will be detected first, it will get mounted and the NTFS dri

Re: The "New BSD Installer" thread has shown me that I am totally obsolete in disk partitioning.

2012-02-20 Thread Peter Maloney
Am 17.02.2012 21:08, schrieb Edwin L. Culp W.: > If such a thing exists, I need a howto in mixing and matching all the > different partitioning options and combinations, pro's and con's, for as > many modern situations as possible. Any suggestions appreciated. To create a full document from scratc

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-20 Thread vermaden
written by ${ME} ... > First BUG: (not fixed yet, but workaround already is working) > > TEST/BUG/CASE: > Plug in FAT32 and NTFS drives at the same time, when FAT32 device > will be detected first, it will get mounted and the NTFS drive will be > mounted TWICE, so I added > __check_already_mounte

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-20 Thread vermaden
written by Andriy Gapon ... > Hey, this seems like a quite nice tool. > Can you create a web-page and/or port for it? > It would be more convenient to follow its development that way. > Thank you! Sure, its now available here, I will try to create port later: https://github.com/vermaden/automoun

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-20 Thread Ivan Klymenko
В Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:43:59 +0100 vermaden пишет: > Hi, > > new version with new features (and BUGs ;p) > > Added check if ntfsfix from sysutils/ntfsprogs is available, if Yes > then try to fix the NTFS filesystem before mouting it. > > Added GPL3 License ... just joking ;) ... added FreeBSD L

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-20 Thread Andriy Gapon
[cc list trimmed] Hey, this seems like a quite nice tool. Can you create a web-page and/or port for it? It would be more convenient to follow its development that way. Thank you! on 20/02/2012 10:43 vermaden said the following: > Hi, > > new version with new features (and BUGs ;p) > > Added c

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-20 Thread vermaden
Hi, new version with new features (and BUGs ;p) Added check if ntfsfix from sysutils/ntfsprogs is available, if Yes then try to fix the NTFS filesystem before mouting it. Added GPL3 License ... just joking ;) ... added FreeBSD License to the file. Added 'noatime' as a default mount option when