Hi.
On 27.02.2012 13:40, Peter Maloney wrote:
8.2-RELEASE is highly unstable with ZFS in my opinion. For example, my
system with 48 GB of RAM would hang or crash for no apparent reason in
random intervals. Upgrading in September fixed most of it, except 1
random hang possibly related to NFS,
On 2/26/12 10:30 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
No matter what effort you put into testing, you can never achieve the
robustness of an older release. I still have 7.4 running on one. This can
stay until next year.
So, why do you want to run the latest release on an important machine? You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 09:27:58AM -0300, H wrote:
it is release engineering who could establish a little bit more
time between code-freeze and RELEASE
As you will see from the (very) long discussion that you are about
to
on 27/02/2012 09:39 Stefan Bethke said the following:
Setting up new hardware (i5 CPU, 16 GB RAM) and doing a burn-in test running
make buildworld in a loop. After a couple of hours, I got this panic.
8-stable is from January, ZFS root.
Does this correlate with any recently fixed bugs,
On 2012-02-27 8:40, Peter Maloney wrote:
And one word of advice: If you want to upgrade your pools to v28, I
think you should consider recreating your pools as v28 rather than
upgrading. There are some side effects to upgrading, such as logs that
can't be removed.
Hi Peter,
Although your
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Garrett R. Groesbeck
garrett.groesb...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope you are well. I've been working on a Sun Blade 2000 with FreeBSD 9.0
(sparc64) installed.
(... snip ...)
panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3
cpuid = 0
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0
Hi,
On Monday 27 February 2012 16:34:02 H wrote:
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 09:27:58AM -0300, H wrote:
furthermore, plans or schedules may be perfect within it's own
restrictions, but only as good as the outcome
so the outcome must be controlled
How? ... setting the
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:57:14AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
Yesterday I've updated my laptop to the latest RELENG_8, it booted just
fine, however, after coming out of suspend, keyboard does not work (well,
almost: I can switch between consoles, Caps Lock works, but I cannot type
On 27/02/2012 05:07, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
I'm haunted by a weird bug.
Some of my servers (IBM x3250) hang periodically. And this is always
saturday morning. Different servers in different cities, all with zfs
and one gig of RAM. And yeah, it's periodic weekly. I can say more -
On FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (recent build today, r232207), issuing
netstat on console or in terminal doesn't give the usual netstat as
expected, instead I receive
netstat: no namelist
What's wrong?
Regards,
Oliver
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:28:15PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
I was mistaken, the latest kernel with working resume is from Jan 4 00:00
UTC, kernel from Jan 4 01:00 UTC does not allow my laptop to come back from
zzz(8) successfully. It seems that offending change is rev. 1.9.2.5 of
On 02/27/12 10:41, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 27 February 2012 16:34:02 H wrote:
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 09:27:58AM -0300, H wrote:
furthermore, plans or schedules may be perfect within it's own
restrictions, but only as good as the outcome
so the outcome
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
hang, the box was running a process with about 2800 threads with heavy
2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
hang, the box was
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 03:53:48PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
On FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (recent build today, r232207), issuing
netstat on console or in terminal doesn't give the usual netstat as
expected, instead I receive
netstat: no namelist
What's wrong?
This usually happens when
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:28:15PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
I was mistaken, the latest kernel with working resume is from Jan 4
00:00
UTC, kernel from Jan 4 01:00 UTC does not allow my laptop to come
back from
zzz(8) successfully. It seems that offending
In 8.3-PRERELEASE, sendmail is now happily ignoring a smarthost unless
DONT_PROBE_INTERFACES is set. That used to be unnecessary.
That machine rarely sends email, but a bug followup sent on Feb 25 went
through. Maybe not significant since it was outside the local domain.
W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze:
You cannot ship that on by default for non-tecnical reasons in a kernel.
Please do not commit a kernel config that can be booted (no LINT cannot be
booted) with these on without consulting appropriate hats upfront.
- ALTQ
- SW_WATCHDOG
-
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:47:49AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
Yes, I can't think of how r229450 would affect resume. All it does is
clear the high order bit in an error reply from an NFS server, since that
bit should never be set in an NFS error reply and, if set, it results in
an mbuf list
On Monday 27 February 2012 11:47 am, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:47:49AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
Yes, I can't think of how r229450 would affect resume. All it
does is clear the high order bit in an error reply from an NFS
server, since that bit should never be set
-Original Message-
From: John Baldwin [mailto:j...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 8:28 PM
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc: Desai, Kashyap; Konstantin Belousov; freebsd-s...@freebsd.org;
Kenneth D. Merry; Justin T. Gibbs; McConnell, Stephen
Subject: Re: mpslsi0 :
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
9.0-RELEASE,
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 5:13:01 pm YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:46:20AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:56:00 pm YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 09:24:53PM -0500, Michael L. Squires wrote:
Sorry for late reply. Had
On 2012-Feb-24 11:06:52 +, Luke Marsden luke-li...@hybrid-logic.co.uk
wrote:
We're running 8.2-RELEASE v15 in production on 24GB RAM amd64 machines
but have been having trouble with short spikes in application memory
usage resulting in huge amounts of swapping, bringing the whole machine
to
Hi--
On Feb 26, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
[ ... ]
all with zfs and one gig of RAM.
This isn't a sensible combination; I wouldn't try to run ZFS on anything less
than 4GB...
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Hi,
I have been pretty busy lately because of boring things
work/life stuff, but here is the new version, with more
options of course and some bugs fixed, it now displays
help when triggered as 'automount --help', at least a
substitute of a man page ;)
I have a quastion, which devd(8) events
Hi,
I have been pretty busy lately because of boring things
work/life stuff, but here is the new version, with more
options of course and some bugs fixed, it now displays
help when triggered as 'automount --help', at least a
substitute of a man page ;)
I have a quastion, which devd(8)
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:49 AM, vermaden verma...@interia.pl wrote:
Hi,
I have been pretty busy lately because of boring things
work/life stuff, but here is the new version, with more
options of course and some bugs fixed, it now displays
help when triggered as 'automount --help', at least
Have you read the Porter's Handbook
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook)?
It tells you how to make a good port,
how to test it (though I don't think
it has anything on redports, yet), and
how to submit it.
I have tried both developers and porters handbooks
Unfortunately, I spent a few days that would
have to understand how it is possible to
detect the inserted CD-ROM with devd; but
alas - the only thing that detects changes
in the drive CD-ROM - a :sysctl kern.geom.conftxt
before inserting the disc:
kern.geom.conftxt: 0 DISK cd0 0
On Mon, February 27, 2012 15:33, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Feb 26, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
[ ... ]
all with zfs and one gig of RAM.
This isn't a sensible combination; I wouldn't try to run ZFS on anything less
than 4GB...
regardless of the pool size ?
I was
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos
math...@eternamente.info wrote:
On Mon, February 27, 2012 15:33, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 26, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
[ ... ]
all with zfs and one gig of RAM.
This isn't a sensible combination; I wouldn't try to run ZFS on
On Feb 27, 2012, at 5:48 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos
math...@eternamente.info wrote:
On Mon, February 27, 2012 15:33, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 26, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
[ ... ]
all with zfs and one gig of RAM.
This
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:46:07PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Can you please try head and/or stable/9? FYI, Linux people found that
some BIOSes can corrupt low 64KB between suspend/resume, which may
cause strangeness like this. I worked around it in head (r231781)
and stable/9 (r232088).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/12 10:53, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze:
You cannot ship that on by default for non-tecnical reasons in a
kernel. Please do not commit a kernel config that can be booted
(no LINT cannot be
Hi.
On 28.02.2012 01:02, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
regardless of the pool size ?
I was planning on making an atom board a file server for my home, and I have
two options: soekris
net6501 2GB RAM and intel board powered by the 330 atom (says 2GB limited as
well). My plans are
to use from 4 up to 8
On Tue, February 28, 2012 01:10, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
On 28.02.2012 01:02, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
regardless of the pool size ?
I was planning on making an atom board a file server for my home, and I have
two options: soekris
net6501 2GB RAM and intel board powered by the 330
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:36 PM, vermaden verma...@interia.pl wrote:
Have you read the Porter's Handbook
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook)?
It tells you how to make a good port,
how to test it (though I don't think
it has anything on redports, yet), and
Hi.
On 27.02.2012 20:42, Johannes Totz wrote:
You could try to narrow it down to one specific script. My first guess
is that 310.locate brings the machine down as it traverses the whole tree.
You're absolutely right.
Eugene.
___
3.6 Submitting the New Port
You submit the port to he ports team and, after review by a ports
committer, the port will be added. The cited section describes exactly
how to go about it. Be sure that it passes portlint(1) before you
submit.
It seems that I was little to tired to figure that
40 matches
Mail list logo
