On 03/08/2012 07:09 AM, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
I could have sworn that 9.0 ISO images were on ftp.freebsd.org and
mirrors, but:
Remote directory: /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES
ftp> dir
229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||29551|).
150 Here comes the directory listing.
drwxrwxr-x2
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 06:09:07AM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> I could have sworn that 9.0 ISO images were on ftp.freebsd.org and
> mirrors, but:
>
> Remote directory: /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES
> ftp> dir
> 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||29551|).
> 150 Here comes the direct
I could have sworn that 9.0 ISO images were on ftp.freebsd.org and
mirrors, but:
Remote directory: /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES
ftp> dir
229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||29551|).
150 Here comes the directory listing.
drwxrwxr-x2 980 100 512 Mar 22 2010 7.3
drwxrw
This is unfortunately a very difficult issue to report (particularly
because I don't have console access to the machine until I get into
the office to reboot it). My server was happily serving NFS on top of
a huge ZFS pool when it ground to a halt -- but only partially. All
of the nfsd threads go
TB --- 2012-03-08 02:35:15 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-08 02:35:15 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-03-08 02:35:15 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-08 02:36:14 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-08 02:36:14 - /usr/b
Hi!
usb/165815
On 3/7/12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Would you please submit this as a PR?
>
> That way it Doesn't get (as) lost.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> adrian
>
> On 6 March 2012 16:53, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem.
>>
>> --
Hi!
Would you please submit this as a PR?
That way it Doesn't get (as) lost.
Thanks!
adrian
On 6 March 2012 16:53, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem.
>
> --
> Oliver Pinter
> (Tresorium)
>
> __
TB --- 2012-03-07 20:24:10 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-07 20:24:10 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-03-07 20:24:10 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-07 20:25:05 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-07 20:25:05 - /usr/b
> -Original Message-
> From: Fabian Keil [mailto:freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:49 AM
Thanks for your comments!
> It's not clear to me why you enable geli integrity verification.
>
> Given that it is single-sector-based it seems inferior to ZFS's
> int
On 7 March 2012 23:13, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please, look someone at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165523
>
Hi,
Thanks for reporting! I just committed the patch to head.
I will MFC it to stable/9 in one week.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
Hi,
Please, look someone at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165523
--
Andrey Zonov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Peter Maloney wrote:
On 03/06/2012 05:08 PM, Warren Block wrote:
A new install of 9-release, updated to 9-stable today with the GENERIC
kernel.
gpart show -l shows GPT labels, yet there isn't even a /dev/gpt
directory.
Has something changed with labels?
...
# Setting this
FYI, there is a bug in 8.2 for 256b keys and was fixed in 8.2-stable.
You may want to apply the fix if it causes you issues.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155118
Andrew
On 8 March 2012 04:59, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Thanks; the machines in question are on 8.2, so this sounds prett
"xenophon\\+freebsd" wrote:
> I have posted revised instructions for installing FreeBSD to an
> encrypted ZFS pool on my blog:
>
> https://web.irtnog.org/~xenophon/blog/revised-freebsd-root-zfs-geli
>
> The entire procedure is documented in a way suitable for scripting. I
> would be very inter
Peter Ankerstål wrote:
Hi,
I just got a Lenovo X220, a one with a i7-2640M CPU. I can boot from cd
and install the OS without any problem, but when im going to boot the
system
for the first time it just stops and give me a menu to choose boot-order
(bios). I figured out that this has something t
On 03/07/12 16:11, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
Hi,
I just got a Lenovo X220, a one with a i7-2640M CPU. I can boot from
cd and install the OS without any problem, but when im going to boot
the system
for the first time it just stops and give me a menu to choose
boot-order (bios). I figured out th
TB --- 2012-03-07 14:20:27 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-07 14:20:27 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-03-07 14:20:27 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-07 14:21:24 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-07 14:21:24 - /usr/b
On 16:11 Wed 07 Mar , Peter Ankerstål wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just got a Lenovo X220, a one with a i7-2640M CPU. I can boot from cd
> and install the OS without any problem, but when im going to boot the
> system
> for the first time it just stops and give me a menu to choose boot-order
> (bios)
Thanks; the machines in question are on 8.2, so this sounds pretty good.
On 3/7/2012 9:55 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 09:09 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
>> Does the crypto(9) framework recognize and use these instructions?
>> Looks like the Windmere-series Xeons will drop into m
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 09:09 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Does the crypto(9) framework recognize and use these instructions?
> Looks like the Windmere-series Xeons will drop into my system boards; I
> gain two cores per CPU at the same time, so I'll go from an 8-way SMP
> system to a 12-way one.
Does the crypto(9) framework recognize and use these instructions?
Looks like the Windmere-series Xeons will drop into my system boards; I
gain two cores per CPU at the same time, so I'll go from an 8-way SMP
system to a 12-way one.
I am considering spending the money to upgrade a couple of serve
Hi,
I just got a Lenovo X220, a one with a i7-2640M CPU. I can boot from cd
and install the OS without any problem, but when im going to boot the
system
for the first time it just stops and give me a menu to choose boot-order
(bios). I figured out that this has something to to with the EFI on
Hi all,
I have posted revised instructions for installing FreeBSD to an
encrypted ZFS pool on my blog:
https://web.irtnog.org/~xenophon/blog/revised-freebsd-root-zfs-geli
The entire procedure is documented in a way suitable for scripting. I
would be very interested in the community's feedback.
> Suggest that you try
> geli_ada0p2_keyfile0_name="/boot/keys/ada0p2.key"
That did it. I can't believe that I missed that. Thanks, Dewayne!
--
I FIGHT FOR THE USERS
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:23:38 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> ...
>> I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
>> the following is a true statement:
>>
>> a page is accounted for in active + in
On 03/06/2012 05:08 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> A new install of 9-release, updated to 9-stable today with the GENERIC
> kernel.
> gpart show -l shows GPT labels, yet there isn't even a /dev/gpt
> directory.
>
> Has something changed with labels?
I haven't tried 9 yet, but this happens with 8.2 also.
TB --- 2012-03-07 07:55:47 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-03-07 07:55:47 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-03-07 07:55:47 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-03-07 07:56:46 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-03-07 07:56:46 - /usr/b
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:23 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> > I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
> > the following is a true statement:
> >
> > a page is accounted for in active + inact
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:23 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> > I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
> > the following is a true statement:
> >
> > a page is accounted for in active + inact
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> Thanks for your email, Chuck.
>
> > > Conversely, if a page *does not* occur in the resident
> > > memory of any process, it must not occupy any space in the active +
> > > inactive lists.
> >
> > Hmm...if a process gets swapped out
30 matches
Mail list logo
