Re: Thinkpad X61s cannot boot 9.1-BETA1

2012-07-20 Thread John Marshall
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, 11:14 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are acpi_acad0: On Line acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times after this, dead. What is supposed

Re: Thinkpad X61s cannot boot 9.1-BETA1

2012-07-20 Thread John Marshall
On 20/07/2012 16:02, John Marshall wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, 11:14 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are acpi_acad0: On Line acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1

9.1-PRERELEASE and ntpd problem

2012-07-20 Thread Daniel Braniss
my console is filling up with: Jul 20 11:08:18 pundit ntpd[1075]: bind() fd 27, family AF_INET6, port 123, scope 2, addr fe80::f66d:4ff:fee1:f7ba, mcast=0 flags=0x11 fails: Can't assign requested address Jul 20 11:08:18 pundit ntpd[1075]: unable to create socket on re0 (8) for

Re: 9.1-PRERELEASE and ntpd problem

2012-07-20 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 07/20/2012 10:18 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: my console is filling up with: Jul 20 11:08:18 pundit ntpd[1075]: bind() fd 27, family AF_INET6, port 123, scope 2, addr fe80::f66d:4ff:fee1:f7ba, mcast=0 flags=0x11 fails: Can't assign requested address Jul 20 11:08:18 pundit ntpd[1075]: unable to

Re: 9.1-PRERELEASE and ntpd problem

2012-07-20 Thread Daniel Braniss
On 07/20/2012 10:18 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: my console is filling up with: Jul 20 11:08:18 pundit ntpd[1075]: bind() fd 27, family AF_INET6, port 123, scope 2, addr fe80::f66d:4ff:fee1:f7ba, mcast=0 flags=0x11 fails: Can't assign requested address Jul 20 11:08:18 pundit

Re: branch 9 and uefi

2012-07-20 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:08:31PM +0200 I heard the voice of Zoran Kolic, and lo! it spake thus: It took me by surprise. The mobo I have on my mind for new desktop has uefi instead of bios. It is asus m5a97, with 970 chipset, well priced among users on the net. How would it behave with 9.1?

Re: branch 9 and uefi

2012-07-20 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Friday 20 July 2012 17:43:34 Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:08:31PM +0200 I heard the voice of Zoran Kolic, and lo! it spake thus: It took me by surprise. The mobo I have on my mind for new desktop has uefi instead of bios. It is asus m5a97, with 970 chipset,

Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1

2012-07-20 Thread Steve McCoy
Hi Adrian, I've submitted the PR as kern/170021. Thanks! On 7/19/12 11:29 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: Oh, and would you please file a PR for this? I've been looking into ACPI related slowdowns for a while and I'm glad you found a culprit. Adrian

Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1

2012-07-20 Thread Steve McCoy
On 7/19/12 10:12 AM, Eric van Gyzen wrote: You might simply try a different idle function. See these sysctls: machdep.idle: acpi machdep.idle_available: spin, mwait, mwait_hlt, hlt, acpi, Eric I've tried your suggestion (with mwait) and the problem went away. Thanks a lot! This seems like

Re: Thinkpad X61s cannot boot 9.1-BETA1

2012-07-20 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2012-07-20 08:02, John Marshall wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, 11:14 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are acpi_acad0: On Line acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times

Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1

2012-07-20 Thread Alexander Motin
On 19.07.2012 18:28, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hm! A timer related bug? I'll CC mav@ on this, as it was his commit (and work in his general area.) I wonder what's going on - is it something to do with the two ACPI calls inserted there, or is it something to do with the change in event timer values?

Re: Thinkpad X61s cannot boot 9.1-BETA1

2012-07-20 Thread jb
Per olof Ljungmark peo at intersonic.se writes: ... Did anyone else experience this? With 9.1-BETA1 the boot process freezes, among the last lines with verbose boot are acpi_acad0: On Line acpi_acad0: acline initialization done, tried 1 times after this, dead. ... Tried ALL

[stable 9] panic on reboot: ipmi_wd_event()

2012-07-20 Thread Sean Bruno
Working on the Dell R420 today, got most of it working, even the broadcom ethernet cards! However, I get the following when I reboot the system: Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...4 Sleeping thread (tid 100107, pid 9) owns a non-sleepable lock KDB: stack backtrace of thread 100107: sched_switch()

Re: branch 9 and uefi

2012-07-20 Thread Zoran Kolic
Thanks all for respond! I'd try to mix answers and not bother you with no reason. You don't say how big your hard drive is, and if you want to run any OS besides FreeBSD. It shall be ssd drive of 64 gb. Freebsd only, as about 10 years long. You can go into the guided installer to see what

Re: branch 9 and uefi

2012-07-20 Thread Zoran Kolic
I'm running a M5A97 Evo just fine on -CURRENT, and I'd be shocked it it had any problem with 9 (or 8 or 7, for that matter). Hurrah! I shall get a bit cheaper version, plain m5a97 or pro. Let me ask you further. What option you chose during install? Guided or manual (and what if manual)?

Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1

2012-07-20 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi Alexander, I'm worried that this won't be the only source of freebsd is slower than linux issues. What can we add to the timer path to make identifying and root causing this issue easy? I'd just like to be absolutely sure that we're not only doing the best job possible, but we can provide

Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1

2012-07-20 Thread Alexander Motin
On 20.07.2012 16:38, Alexander Motin wrote: On 19.07.2012 18:28, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hm! A timer related bug? I'll CC mav@ on this, as it was his commit (and work in his general area.) I wonder what's going on - is it something to do with the two ACPI calls inserted there, or is it something

Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1

2012-07-20 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. On 20.07.2012 22:38, Adrian Chadd wrote: I'm worried that this won't be the only source of freebsd is slower than linux issues. What can we add to the timer path to make identifying and root causing this issue easy? I'd just like to be absolutely sure that we're not only doing the best job

Re: Checksum errors across ZFS array

2012-07-20 Thread Dr Josef Karthauser
On 19 Jul 2012, at 18:15, James Snow wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:05:32PM +0100, Dr Joe Karthauser wrote: Hi James, It's almost definitely a memory problem. I'd change it ASAP if I were you. I lost about 70mb from my zfs pool for this very reason just a few weeks ago. Luckily I

Re: Checksum errors across ZFS array

2012-07-20 Thread James Snow
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote: Take care though, my system which had been working fine for about a year when I noticed the ZFS rot (which all appears to be recent in time). I ran memcheck+ on it for 8 hours or so, and it showed no errors at all. However,

FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 fails to install in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux

2012-07-20 Thread Richard Yao
Dear FreeBSD Developers, Trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux fails before the kernel dmesg with 'kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled'. I am running the following command: qemu-system-x86_64 -drive file=/dev/zvol/rpool/KVM/freebsd,if=scsi-bootorder=c

Re: Checksum errors across ZFS array

2012-07-20 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/20/2012 15:22, James Snow wrote: I've run memtest for about 20 hours now (13 hours in one pass, 7 and counting on the second) and seen no errors. Hrm. You probably know this already, but just in case ... Software memory tests cannot tell you conclusively that memory is good, only that

Re: Checksum errors across ZFS array

2012-07-20 Thread James Snow
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:46:21PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: You probably know this already, but just in case ... Software memory tests cannot tell you conclusively that memory is good, only that it's bad. I may have known that in a past life but certainly wasn't thinking about it now. To

Re: Checksum errors across ZFS array

2012-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Dr Josef Karthauser j...@tao.org.uk So, take care if the memory doesn't report any failures, it might still be faulty. p.s. It was my fault that I wasn't running ECC memory on the system! :/. We've even seen this with ECC memory. Running the memory in a

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 fails to install in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux

2012-07-20 Thread Richard Yao
On 07/20/2012 06:23 PM, Richard Yao wrote: Dear FreeBSD Developers, Trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux fails before the kernel dmesg with 'kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled'. I am running the following command: qemu-system-x86_64 -drive

Re: stable/9 panic Bad tailq NEXT(0xffffffff80e52660-tqh_last) != NULL

2012-07-20 Thread Sean Bruno
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 02:39 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 13/07/2012 19:31 Sean Bruno said the following: Well this is new. I haven't a clue what Dell has done on this R620, but this popped up today after I did a boat load of BIOS updates and tried to install stable/9 from our yahoo

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 fails to install in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux

2012-07-20 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: On 07/20/2012 06:23 PM, Richard Yao wrote: Dear FreeBSD Developers, Trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux fails before the kernel dmesg with 'kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled'. I am running

Re: Recommendation for Hyervisor to host FreeBSD

2012-07-20 Thread Antony Mawer
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote: Am Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:43:06 +0100 schrieb Pete French petefre...@ingresso.co.uk: So, my work surprise for a Thursday morning is an urgent requirement to see if we can run a set of FreeBSD machines under virtualised

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 fails to install in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux

2012-07-20 Thread Richard Yao
On 07/20/2012 08:56 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: On 07/20/2012 06:23 PM, Richard Yao wrote: Dear FreeBSD Developers, Trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux fails before the kernel dmesg with 'kernel trap