Re: time keeps on slipping... slipping...

2012-10-10 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Alexander Motin wrote this message on Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 01:43 +0300: > On 08.10.2012 07:02, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > >I recently put together a new machine w/ a SuperMicro H8SCM and an > >AMD Opteron 4228 HE... I've having an issue where the clock on the > >machine skips around... The wierd p

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-11 05:48:04 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-11 05:48:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-11 05

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Ben Morrow
Quoth Brandon Allbery : > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Claude Buisson wrote: > > > I can easily understand that developpers are happy to switch to new tools, > > but > > the question is: do FreeBSD developpers care a bit about non developpers, > > and > > FreeBSD developers are required to k

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-11 01:49:01 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-11 01:49:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-11 01

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:34:56AM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: > > FWIW, you can compile the svn binary elsewhere, statically linked, and > > save the dependency problem by copying the resulting binary around. > > > > Lucky people who have an "elsewhere". > > And the static binary is as much blo

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:28:05AM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: > >> - the recently created snapshots.glenbarber.us is much more limited > > > > May I ask what it is that is limiting? If there is some limitation, I > > certainly will do what I can to address it. > > > > Right now, the limitations

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Claude Buisson wrote: > I can easily understand that developpers are happy to switch to new tools, > but > the question is: do FreeBSD developpers care a bit about non developpers, > and > FreeBSD developers are required to keep their development systems and tool

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Claude Buisson
On 10/11/2012 02:09, Glen Barber wrote: On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:02:40AM +0200, Michael Ross wrote: - I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of, Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space). I think it is rather significant: FWIW, you can compile t

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Claude Buisson
On 10/11/2012 01:40, Glen Barber wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots. I know, but: - there are no more "official snapshots" on freebsd.org This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentione

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Claude Buisson
On 10/11/2012 01:33, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buisson wrote: On 10/10/2012 14:46, Jakub Lach wrote: "Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org." But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct. Honestly, my message was also

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:02:40AM +0200, Michael Ross wrote: > >> - I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of, > > > > Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space). > > I think it is rather significant: > FWIW, you can compile the svn binary elsewhere, sta

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Michael Ross
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:33:57 +0200, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buisson wrote: - I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of, Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space). I think it is rather significant: pkg_i

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:47:32AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > On 11/10/2012 00:40, Glen Barber wrote: > > This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a > > previous reply), the end goal is "official" snapshots. > > I think a lot of people will be wondering what's special

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Bruce Cran
On 11/10/2012 00:40, Glen Barber wrote: This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a previous reply), the end goal is "official" snapshots. I think a lot of people will be wondering what's special about _your_ snapshots that they'll become official - why not just mak

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Glen Barber
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: > > And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots. > > I know, but: > > - there are no more "official snapshots" on freebsd.org This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a previous reply), the end g

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buisson wrote: > On 10/10/2012 14:46, Jakub Lach wrote: >> >> "Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org." >> >> But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct. >> > Honestly, my message was also a test about the current state

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Jakub Lach
Sorry if I've misunderstood you, but how making second unofficial repository forwards the case of having official one? On the side, having void link on main page, like now is worst option. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-CURRENT-and-9-STABLE-s

Re: time keeps on slipping... slipping...

2012-10-10 Thread Alexander Motin
On 08.10.2012 07:02, John-Mark Gurney wrote: I recently put together a new machine w/ a SuperMicro H8SCM and an AMD Opteron 4228 HE... I've having an issue where the clock on the machine skips around... The wierd part is that it's very sudden when it happens... ntp sometimes brings it back, bu

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-10 20:02:08 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-10 20:02:08 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-10 20

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-10 Thread Gót András
Hi, Sorry for crossposting, but this would be really nice to be fixed in the final release. I just installed one RC2 onto a XenServer 6.1 cluster but cannot boot with XENHVM kernel. I started a thread on the freebsd-xen list, which is here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/2012-

FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 Available...

2012-10-10 Thread Ken Smith
The second release candidate of the 9.1-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, and powerpc64. The MD5/SHA256 checksums are at the bottom of this message. The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images are available

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: > As an addon, according to lists.freebsd.org, svn-ports have not been > updated since more than a day... This is an unrelated problem, caused by machine upgrades/moves at our main data center. > - the recently created snapshots.glen

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Claude Buisson
On 10/10/2012 14:46, Jakub Lach wrote: "Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org." But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct. Honestly, my message was also a test about the current state of the svn to cvs gateway. Is it down without nobody taking care ? or

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Jakub Lach
Thanks for information, and especially thanks for providing snapshots- they are my primary source (and for many) for fresh FreeBSD isos. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-CURRENT-and-9-STABLE-snapshots-tp5749922p5750927.html Sent from the freebsd-

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Claude Buisson
On 10/10/2012 16:07, Hiroki Sato wrote: Jakub Lach wrote in<1349873186577-5750838.p...@n5.nabble.com>: ja> "Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org." ja> ja> But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct. ja> ja> And for the record, they are NOT official

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-10 16:12:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-10 16:12:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-10 16

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Hiroki Sato
Jakub Lach wrote in <1349873186577-5750838.p...@n5.nabble.com>: ja> "Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org." ja> ja> But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct. ja> ja> And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots. Migrating from CVS to SVN in the

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Jakub Lach
"Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org." But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct. And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-CURRENT-and-9-STABLE-snapshots-tp5

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-10 12:17:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-10 12:17:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-10 12

Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots

2012-10-10 Thread Claude Buisson
On 10/08/2012 22:16, Jakub Lach wrote: "FreeBSD/arm and FreeBSD/mips will be added soon!." https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/ As the last snapshot is from October 6, I infer that they use cvs/cvsup, with the svn to cvs gateway down since this date .. Claude Buisson __

Re: wpi0: fatal firmware error

2012-10-10 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
CCing Benjamin Close as he ported wpi(4) driver to FreeBSD. On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to setup my wireless on FreeBSD 9.0-p3 amd64 and i get the > following > error: > > wpi0: fatal firmware error > [...] > rc.conf config: > w

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-10 08:27:06 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-10 08:27:06 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-10 08