[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-29

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-29

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-29

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-29

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-29

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-29 06:36:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-29

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-29 07:29:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-29 07:29:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-29

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-10-29 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-10-29 07:29:06 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-10-29 07:29:06 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-10-29

Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270)

2012-10-29 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
schrieb Attilio Rao am 27.10.2012 23:07 (localtime): On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote: schrieb

Is Your Computer Safe? Get StrongHold Computer Backup Today!

2012-10-29 Thread ThirdAge
[bGl2ZWNvbmNsaWVudElEPTQ2Mjk5NzU5MDcxNzImQ3JlYXRpdmVJRD1GMDA2ODc1MS1DR DlDLTQ1NDUtQjc4Ri1ENUFDREQyNjcyRkUtNzE4NDImUGxhY2VtZW50SUQ9MiZFdmVudFR5 cGU9SW1wcmVzc2lvbiZyYW5kPTMzVmw.jpeg] [1][img_top.png] [NFB-AwardColor.jpg] [info.jpg] Get Stronghold today and let our comprehensive,

CPU Competition Issue

2012-10-29 Thread Steven Nikkel
I'm running a long duration CPU-centric process that will gobble up all available CPU time. I have it set to run at nice +20. While it's running I've noticed other processes have a hard time getting CPU time and run their activites very slowly. The processes I've noticed issues with are IO

Re: CPU Competition Issue

2012-10-29 Thread Chuck Burns
On 10/29/2012 08:33 PM, Steven Nikkel wrote: I'm running a long duration CPU-centric process that will gobble up all available CPU time. I have it set to run at nice +20. While it's running I've noticed other processes have a hard time getting CPU time and run their activites very slowly. The