On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:19:12PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> So, please also do:
>
> svn merge -c241451 ^/head/release release
>
You'll want to merge one more revision:
svn merge -c241596 ^/head/release release
Same as before - I _think_ this should work. :-)
Glen
pgpQRYOYHWRns.p
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:07:24PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> I do not remember why, specifically, but the change in question was not
> merged to the releng/9.1 branch.
>
> Please try the following, in the top-level directory of your releng/9.1
> source checkout:
>
> svn merge -c240077 ^/hea
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:11:15PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> > Oops, my bad. Yes exact same behavior; make -C release cdrom fails with
> > ...
> > find //tank/cvs/9.1/src/release/dist/doc -empty -delete
> > find //tank/cvs/9.1/src/release/dist/games -empty -delete
> > find: -delete: //tank/cvs/9
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 01:08:13AM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:11:22AM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > > interesting idea, would be pretty bad if sudo caused that.
> > > >
> >
> > Indeed, but sudo only k
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:11:22AM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > interesting idea, would be pretty bad if sudo caused that.
> > >
>
> Indeed, but sudo only keeps certain environment variables, so it's not
> entirely unexpected if this i
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I'm running a long duration CPU-centric process that will gobble up all
available CPU time. I have it set to run at nice +20. While it's running I've
noticed other processes have a hard time getting CPU time and run their
activites very slowly. The process
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:11:22AM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > interesting idea, would be pretty bad if sudo caused that.
> >
Indeed, but sudo only keeps certain environment variables, so it's not
entirely unexpected if this is the case.
> > I gave it run without direct sudo call ( ie sudo
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 05:32:20PM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>> > > Are you defining WITH*_GAMES in src.conf or make.conf? If this looks
>> > > like what I think it looks l
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 05:32:20PM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > Are you defining WITH*_GAMES in src.conf or make.conf? If this looks
> > > like what I think it looks like, I fixed this a few months ago.
> > >
> >
> > Used same command
Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Oct 30), jb said:
> > Alfred Perlstein mu.org> writes:
> > > Hey folks, any reason why not to include the following patch in
> > > 9.1? It
> > > would be nice to have tmpfs be exportable.
> > >
> > > I'm good to commit it, I can also wait until post 9.1.
>
How much memory is in this machine?
maxsockets is in turn clipped by "nmbclusters" which is in turn clipped
by "maxusers" which is limited to 384 MAXIMUM unless you're running
-CURRENT.
On 10/30/12 10:05 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On 10/30/12 06:21, Adam Strohl wrote:
Hey -STABLE,
I've
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 05:32:20PM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > Are you defining WITH*_GAMES in src.conf or make.conf? If this looks
> > like what I think it looks like, I fixed this a few months ago.
> >
>
> Used same command for building both, see below. And yes, WITHOUT_GAMES is
> set in
On 10/30/12 8:31 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Oct 30), jb said:
Alfred Perlstein mu.org> writes:
Hey folks, any reason why not to include the following patch in 9.1? It
would be nice to have tmpfs be exportable.
I'm good to commit it, I can also wait until post 9.1.
...
How do
On 10/30/12 06:21, Adam Strohl wrote:
Hey -STABLE,
I've got a client who we've setup a FreeBSD cluster for with about a
dozens servers, all behind two front end proxies/LBs/firewalls which
also act as NAT gateways for the internal servers.
On the active front end proxy we've started seeing "fat
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:58:52PM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > I'm trying to build some images for 9-stable ( r242349 ) and 9.1-RC3, but
> > using the release tools doesn't really work.
> >
> > 9.1-RC3 fails with:
> > ...
> > cd /tank/cv
On 10/30/2012 23:05, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Check the output of 'netstat -mb', maybe you're also running out of mbufs?
There was nothing denied there that I can see:
35696/4039/39735 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
2069/3797/5866/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
2069/2077 m
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:58:52PM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> I'm trying to build some images for 9-stable ( r242349 ) and 9.1-RC3, but
> using the release tools doesn't really work.
>
> 9.1-RC3 fails with:
> ...
> cd /tank/cvs/9.1/src/libexec/rtld-elf; make install -DNO_SUBDIR
> DESTDIR=/tm
Check the output of 'netstat -mb', maybe you're also running out of mbufs?
Adrian
On 30 October 2012 06:21, Adam Strohl wrote:
> Hey -STABLE,
>
> I've got a client who we've setup a FreeBSD cluster for with about a dozens
> servers, all behind two front end proxies/LBs/firewalls which also ac
I'm trying to build some images for 9-stable ( r242349 ) and 9.1-RC3, but
using the release tools doesn't really work.
9.1-RC3 fails with:
...
cd /tank/cvs/9.1/src/libexec/rtld-elf; make install -DNO_SUBDIR
DESTDIR=/tmp/newdist/lib32 SHARED=copies
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 -C -b -fschg
> On 30/10/2012 19:27, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 30/10/2012 03:33 Steven Nikkel said the following:
>>> I'm running a long duration CPU-centric process that will gobble up all
>>> available CPU time. I have it set to run at nice +20. While it's
>>> running I've
>>> noticed other processes have a ha
In the last episode (Oct 30), jb said:
> Alfred Perlstein mu.org> writes:
> > Hey folks, any reason why not to include the following patch in 9.1? It
> > would be nice to have tmpfs be exportable.
> >
> > I'm good to commit it, I can also wait until post 9.1.
> > ...
>
> How do you identify tmpf
Alfred Perlstein mu.org> writes:
>
> Hey folks, any reason why not to include the following patch in 9.1? It
> would be nice to have tmpfs be exportable.
>
> I'm good to commit it, I can also wait until post 9.1.
> ...
How do you identify tmpfs ? With fsid ?
Since nfs server is stateless, ar
Thanks all. I will fix up the merge step and commit.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 30, 2012, at 5:00 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:38:16AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> Hey folks, any reason why not to include the following patch in 9.1? It
>> would be nice to h
Hey -STABLE,
I've got a client who we've setup a FreeBSD cluster for with about a
dozens servers, all behind two front end proxies/LBs/firewalls which
also act as NAT gateways for the internal servers.
On the active front end proxy we've started seeing "fatal: socket: No
buffer space availab
On 30/10/2012 19:27, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 30/10/2012 03:33 Steven Nikkel said the following:
I'm running a long duration CPU-centric process that will gobble up all
available CPU time. I have it set to run at nice +20. While it's running I've
noticed other processes have a hard time getting CP
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:38:16AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Hey folks, any reason why not to include the following patch in 9.1? It
> would be nice to have tmpfs be exportable.
>
> I'm good to commit it, I can also wait until post 9.1.
It is too late for 9.1. Patch is fine for stable/9, b
On 2012/10/30 17:38, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Hey folks, any reason why not to include the following patch in 9.1?
It would be nice to have tmpfs be exportable.
Ah, sorry. I forgot to MFC it.
I'm good to commit it, I can also wait until post 9.1.
Please commit it, thanks.
Kevin
__
Hey folks, any reason why not to include the following patch in 9.1? It
would be nice to have tmpfs be exportable.
I'm good to commit it, I can also wait until post 9.1.
$ svn diff
Index: .
===
--- .(revision 242331)
+++ .(
on 30/10/2012 03:33 Steven Nikkel said the following:
> I'm running a long duration CPU-centric process that will gobble up all
> available CPU time. I have it set to run at nice +20. While it's running I've
> noticed other processes have a hard time getting CPU time and run their
> activites very
29 matches
Mail list logo
