buildworld problem 9.1 stable

2013-01-23 Thread joerg surmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 hey, i have a alix board here. it's a new installation. *#make buildworld* snip {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:17822: Warning: end of file not at end of a line; newline inserted {standard input}:19715: Error: unknown

9.1 coredump

2013-01-23 Thread Alexander Nikiforenko
hi, i was run ssh-keygen with output to 32g usb 3.0 flash, and got this core sorry, i was forgot. i mount that flash via fusefs-exfat-0.9.8 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Oliver Brandmueller
Hi, in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or needed) to install it via ports, the only reasonable way was to use pkg_add for that if you didn't want to pollute your system with otherwise unneeded software. Then there came csup. Small, in the base. You could install

Re: time issues and ZFS

2013-01-23 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 22/01/2013 20:42 Adrian Chadd said the following: Hi! As I said before, the problem with non-HLT loops with event-timer in -9 and -head is that it calls the idle function inside a critical section (critical_enter and critical_exit) which blocks interrupts from occuring. The EI;HLT

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Ronald Klop
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:40:50 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote: Hi, in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or needed) to install it via ports, the only reasonable way was to use pkg_add for that if you didn't want to pollute your system with

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Frank Staals
Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net writes: snip So, is there some alternative small svn client, that leaves a drastically smaller footprint probably somewhere around, probably even in the ports or is there anything I'm missing? snip This type of question has been asked quite a few

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Oliver Brandmueller
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Frank Staals wrote: This type of question has been asked quite a few times recently. At this point there is no svn version of csup, however there were people working on it (or at least: there is a svnsup project). For details please search recent ports

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Chris Rees
On 23 Jan 2013 15:37, Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Frank Staals wrote: This type of question has been asked quite a few times recently. At this point there is no svn version of csup, however there were people working on it (or at

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/23/2013 10:37 AM, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: But my main concern is the system sources anyway. freebsd-update is not feasible for me, as described in the original post. Actually, if you build the port minus the NEON option, its as bad in terms of dependencies. # pkg_info -r

Re: 9.1 coredump

2013-01-23 Thread Attilio Rao
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Alexander Nikiforenko a...@rambler-co.ru wrote: hi, i was run ssh-keygen with output to 32g usb 3.0 flash, and got this core sorry, i was forgot. i mount that flash via fusefs-exfat-0.9.8 This is on stable/9? If yes, I will send you patches to use new fuse

Re: time issues and ZFS

2013-01-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 23 January 2013 06:58, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: I don't think that this is true of x86 hardware in general. You might have hit some limitation or a quirk or a bug or an erratum for some particular hardware. E.g. a chipset on this machine has a bit described as such: Set to 1

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:55:32AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: On 1/23/2013 10:37 AM, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: But my main concern is the system sources anyway. freebsd-update is not feasible for me, as described in the original post. Actually, if you build the port minus the

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Isaac (.ike) Levy
One of my teammates and I were just doing a write up on this very issue, On Jan 23, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: On 1/23/2013 10:37 AM, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: But my main concern is the system sources anyway. freebsd-update is not feasible for me, as described in the original

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Peter Wemm
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Isaac (.ike) Levy i...@blackskyresearch.net wrote: 1) License. Many of SVN's dependencies will never be available in the FreeBSD source. While this is totally OK for development, SVN is 3rd party software, this is unacceptable to force as 'the' respected

Re: kvm vlan virtio problem

2013-01-23 Thread Franz Schwartau
Hi Bryan, On 23.01.2013 04:44, Bryan Venteicher wrote: Hi, - Original Message - Hi! The same warning shows up in our setup: Jan 21 23:40:46 host kernel: WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1712 skb_gso_segment+0x1df/0x2b0() (Tainted: GW --- ) Jan 21 23:40:46 host

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Emanuel Haupt
Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote: Hi, in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or needed) to install it via ports, the only reasonable way was to use pkg_add for that if you didn't want to pollute your system with otherwise unneeded software. Then

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Isaac (.ike) Levy
On Jan 23, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Emanuel Haupt wrote: Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote: Hi, in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or needed) to install it via ports, the only reasonable way was to use pkg_add for that if you didn't want to pollute your

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Chris Rees
On 23 January 2013 20:41, Isaac (.ike) Levy i...@blackskyresearch.net wrote: On Jan 23, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Emanuel Haupt wrote: Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote: Hi, in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or needed) to install it via ports, the only

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Chris Rees
On 23 January 2013 19:17, Emanuel Haupt eha...@freebsd.org wrote: devel/subversion already has an option to build a static version. A solution could be to create a stub port (devel/subversion-static) similar to: shells/bash-devel shells/bash-static-devel dns/ldns dns/py-ldns Great idea;

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
(Please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed to the list) Don't confuse the excessive ports default settings as dependencies. You can make a quite mean and lean svn client. I did a 100% BSD-license-compatible src/contrib/svn style proof-of-concept back when we were planning what to do. Things

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Chris. You wrote 24 января 2013 г., 1:25:44: CR Great idea; CR http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/svn-static.diff I think, adding SERF or NEON (what is smaller) is good idea, or this build will lack http support, and it could be surprise to user, as http access method is well-know and

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Chris Rees
On 23 Jan 2013 21:45, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, Chris. You wrote 24 января 2013 г., 1:25:44: CR Great idea; CR http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/svn-static.diff I think, adding SERF or NEON (what is smaller) is good idea, or this build will lack http support, and

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
(Please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed to the list) Great idea; http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/svn-static.diff Lev, do you mind if I commit this? I haven't touched the subversion port, but it'll have you as maintainer :) If you prefer, I don't mind maintaining this. As I

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Peter Wemm
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 23 January 2013 19:17, Emanuel Haupt eha...@freebsd.org wrote: devel/subversion already has an option to build a static version. A solution could be to create a stub port (devel/subversion-static) similar to:

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Peter Wemm
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 23 January 2013 19:17, Emanuel Haupt eha...@freebsd.org wrote: devel/subversion already has an option to build a static version. A solution could be to

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Perry Hutchison
Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote: pkg_info -r /usr/ports/packages6/All/subversion-1.7.8.tbz Information for /usr/ports/packages6/All/subversion-1.7.8.tbz: Depends on: Static linked, NEON included, run on 6+. This posting looks like an announcement of a package available for

Re: time issues and ZFS

2013-01-23 Thread John Nielsen
On Jan 22, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:33 AM, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote: host: DELL PowerEdge R710, 16GB, I administer a Dell PowerEdge R710 and I've been seeing the exact same thing. It's currently running FreeBSD

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Peter Wemm
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 23 January 2013 19:17, Emanuel Haupt eha...@freebsd.org wrote: devel/subversion already

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:20:32PM -0800, Perry Hutchison wrote: Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote: pkg_info -r /usr/ports/packages6/All/subversion-1.7.8.tbz Information for /usr/ports/packages6/All/subversion-1.7.8.tbz: Depends on: Static linked, NEON included, run

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Emanuel Haupt
Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 23 January 2013 19:17, Emanuel Haupt

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:40:50 +0100 Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote: Hi, [skipped] So, is there some alternative small svn client, that leaves a drastically smaller footprint probably somewhere around, probably even in the ports or is there anything I'm missing? The current

Re: time issues and ZFS

2013-01-23 Thread Daniel Braniss
On Jan 22, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:33 AM, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote: host: DELL PowerEdge R710, 16GB, I administer a Dell PowerEdge R710 and I've been seeing the exact same =thing. It's currently running FreeBSD

RE: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-23 Thread Dewayne
The objective is to return to a base build of FreeBSD that performs the expected task of being able to pull source, without having to acquire a port. Regardless of our individual solutions/workarounds, the task is to pull and maintain source. Is the discussion going to result in something like