On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:45:53AM +, Ben Morrow wrote:
> At 9AM + on 24/01/13 you (Ben Morrow) wrote:
> > Quoth 'Jeremy Chadwick' :
> > >
> > > Regarding your "svn-lite" theory of having that added to src/contrib/,
> > > let me introduce you to Subversion's actual dependencies, and I'll
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:48:51PM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:58:15PM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
> >>On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >>
> >#1. Map the physical drive slots to how they show up in FBSD s
In article ,
wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
>As far as "best practices", situations vary so much that I don't know if
>any drive ID method can be recommended. For a FreeBSD ZFS document, a
>useful sample configuration is going to be small enough that anything
>would work. A survey of the techniqu
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Gyrd Thane Lange wrote:
> On 23.01.2013 15:40, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> > However, I either overlook something important or we are now at the
> > point we had with cvsup in the early days: The software I need to
> > (source-)update the system doens't co
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:58:15PM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
#1. Map the physical drive slots to how they show up in FBSD so if a
disk is removed and the machine is rebooted all the disks after that
remo
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:58:15PM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> >>>#1. Map the physical drive slots to how they show up in FBSD so if a
> >>>disk is removed and the machine is rebooted all the disks after that
> >>>removed one do not have an 'off
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:42:19 +0100
Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:57:17AM -0800, 'Jeremy
1- svnsup-distill: takes a revision from svn and creates
a text file
(called a delta) that represents it. It seems to be
almost
complete.
To answer one of John Mehr's prob
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:27:23 +0100
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Also I'd like to mention John Mehr, who's work on a
"lightweight,
dependency-free, BSD licensed program to pull source
using the svn
protocol" (couldn't say it better, so I use his words
:-)). Hope this
will make it into ports
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:47:39PM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > On Friday, January 25, 2013 3:46:10 am Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > this server, a Dell R720 has 4 bge on board,
> > > Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572
> > > bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.
On 2013-Jan-25 13:42:19 +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>The current svnsup design is composed of:
>
> 1- svnsup-distill: takes a revision from svn and creates a text file
>(called a delta) that represents it. It seems to be almost
>complete.
>
> 2- svnsup-apply: takes a delta generated by
Disable the offload options (rx checksum, tx checksum, tcp segment
offload) and retry with each option disabled, one at a time.
Hopefully you'll find that one or a combination of options is causing
your issue.
Thanks,
adrian
On 25 January 2013 02:45, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> Hi,
> It seems th
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 25.01.13 21:44, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
>
>> Btw, after removing all ZFS snapshots today (more than a 1k) the system
>> is still running (not something I can say for the past few days where I've
>> seen multiple reboots a day).
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
#1. Map the physical drive slots to how they show up in FBSD so if a
disk is removed and the machine is rebooted all the disks after that
removed one do not have an 'off by one error'. i.e. if you have
ada0-ada14 and remove ada8 then reboot - normall
On 25.01.13 21:44, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
Btw, after removing all ZFS snapshots today (more than a 1k) the
system is still running (not something I can say for the past few days
where I've seen multiple reboots a day).. But it's still early to say
that the snapshots might be causing th
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> I used to get daily(ish) lockups with my server.
>
Hey Chris,
> I guess the drives are mirrored? Try yanking one for a bit (leave the
> computer on) and try it in another computer.
>
Yep, 2 disks each of 1Tb in a mirror.
> I tried that,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:12:03PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
[...]
> It is absurd to require the installation of any port, if your only
> intention is to update the base system sources.
I think others have already pointed this out, but
"if your only intention is to update the base system
sourc
On 25 Jan 2013 18:28, "Dimitry Andric" wrote:
>
> On 2013-01-25 16:41, Chris Rees wrote:
> ...
>
>> I've just created devel/subversion-static that will be available by
pkg_add
>> once the package builds are back.
>
>
> Thanks, but the port does not link on head, due to a problem in apr:
>
> /usr/l
On 2013-01-25 16:41, Chris Rees wrote:
...
I've just created devel/subversion-static that will be available by pkg_add
once the package builds are back.
Thanks, but the port does not link on head, due to a problem in apr:
/usr/local/lib/libapr-1.a(apr_snprintf.o): In function `apr_vformatter':
On 25 Jan 2013 10:27, "Marin Atanasov Nikolov" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Bob Bishop wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 25 Jan 2013, at 09:29, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
> >
> > > Hello again :)
> > >
> > > Here's my update on these spontaneous reboots after less than a week
> > sin
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>>> On 25 Jan 2013, at 11:45, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> It seems that I have more issues with the bge,
>>>Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572
>>>
>>> ifconfig says:
>>> bge2: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 15=00
>
> > On 25 Jan 2013, at 11:45, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > It seems that I have more issues with the bge,
> > Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572
> >
> > ifconfig says:
> > bge2: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 15=00
> > options=c019b > O,LINKSTATE>
> > ether xx...
> > in
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 25/01/2013 12:26 Marin Atanasov Nikolov said the following:
Yes, it's a brand new one.
Then no: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathtub_curve
But if a new (as in "replacement") power supply does not change the
symptoms, it's likely not the problem.
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:38:33 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 25/01/2013 13:38, Ian Smith wrote:
> > I'm trying to work out exactly when support for checking out 9-STABLE
> > CVS sources - and I'm only talking about system sources here - will end?
>
> The date that CVS for src will cease to
> On Friday, January 25, 2013 3:46:10 am Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this server, a Dell R720 has 4 bge on board,
> > Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572
> > bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.1.7.0
> > bge0: CHIP ID 0x0572; ASIC REV 0x5720; CHIP REV 0x57200
On 25 Jan 2013 13:39, "Ian Smith" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:57:17 -0800, 'Jeremy Chadwick' wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:34:33PM +1100, Dewayne wrote:
> > > The objective is to return to a base build of FreeBSD that performs
> > > the expected task of being able to pull source
On 25/01/2013 13:38, Ian Smith wrote:
> I'm trying to work out exactly when support for checking out 9-STABLE
> CVS sources - and I'm only talking about system sources here - will end?
The date that CVS for src will cease to be kept in sync with SVN and
when cvsup etc. are officially withdrawn fo
On Friday, January 25, 2013 3:46:10 am Daniel Braniss wrote:
> Hi,
> this server, a Dell R720 has 4 bge on board,
> Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572
> bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.1.7.0
> bge0: CHIP ID 0x0572; ASIC REV 0x5720; CHIP REV 0x57200; PCI-E
>
On Jan 25, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
>
> As others have suggested, an SVN package that could be installed with a
> static build and run dependency-free binary would help ease the pain for
> those looking specifically at updating 9.x or 8.x sources to -STABLE as
> a directly usable cs
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:27:23AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
...
an Ian Smith and des for working on a svnsup solution, which also might
in the future be something that solves the problem!
- Oliver
--
| Oliver Brandmueller http://sysadm.in/ o...@sysadm.in |
|
On 25 Jan 2013, at 11:45, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> Hi,
> It seems that I have more issues with the bge,
> Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572
>
> ifconfig says:
> bge2: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
> options=c019b O,LINKSTATE>
> ether xx...
> inet6 xxx prefixlen 64 scope
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:57:17 -0800, 'Jeremy Chadwick' wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:34:33PM +1100, Dewayne wrote:
> > The objective is to return to a base build of FreeBSD that performs
> > the expected task of being able to pull source, without having to
> > acquire a port. Regardless
On 23.01.13 21:09, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Isaac (.ike) Levy
wrote:
1) License. Many of SVN's dependencies will never be available in the FreeBSD
source.
While this is totally OK for development, SVN is 3rd party software, this is
unacceptable to force as 'the'
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:57:17AM -0800, 'Jeremy Chadwick' wrote:
[...]
> Also, just as a footnote point to readers: please do not bring up
> svnsup. Until it's stated by some official FreeBSD person that
> "{committers} are actively working on this and bringing it into the base
> system so peop
Hi,
It seems that I have more issues with the bge,
Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572
ifconfig says:
bge2: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=c019b
ether xx...
inet6 xxx prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet xxx... netmask 0xf000 broadcast yyy
nd6 options=21
media:
on 25/01/2013 12:26 Marin Atanasov Nikolov said the following:
> Yes, it's a brand new one.
Then no: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathtub_curve
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Bob Bishop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25 Jan 2013, at 09:29, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
>
> > Hello again :)
> >
> > Here's my update on these spontaneous reboots after less than a week
> since
> > I've updated to stable/9.
> >
> > First two days the system was runni
Hi,
On 25 Jan 2013, at 09:29, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
> Hello again :)
>
> Here's my update on these spontaneous reboots after less than a week since
> I've updated to stable/9.
>
> First two days the system was running fine with no reboots happening, so I
> though that this update actual
On 01/25/2013 10:29 AM, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
Hello again :)
Here's my update on these spontaneous reboots after less than a week since
I've updated to stable/9.
First two days the system was running fine with no reboots happening, so I
though that this update actually fixed it, but I w
Hello again :)
Here's my update on these spontaneous reboots after less than a week since
I've updated to stable/9.
First two days the system was running fine with no reboots happening, so I
though that this update actually fixed it, but I was wrong.
The reboots are still happening and still no
Hi folks,
thank you for all the answers and fruitful discussion.
Special thanks goes to Chris Rees for coming up with the
subversion-static ports quite fast, so now we're hoping for package
building to kick in here - but that is a quick and very useful way after
setting up a fresh machine (spe
Hi,
this server, a Dell R720 has 4 bge on board,
Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572
bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.1.7.0
bge0: CHIP ID 0x0572; ASIC REV 0x5720; CHIP REV 0x57200; PCI-E
miibus0: on bge0
...
I have connected the ethernet to port labe
If you have ACPI suspend/resume working, if it used to work but stopped working
at some time, if it never worked, but you are still hoping, could you please
test the following patch and report back?
http://svn.freebsd.by/files/acpi-apic-wakeup-final.patch
--
Andriy Gapon
___
Hello Sergey,
Thursday, January 24, 2013, 10:09:58 PM, you wrote:
>> I think you don't understand the reason why people are asking for
>> this. I personally experienced the need not long ago. I had stable/9
>> branch and wanted to downgrade to 9.0. The entire process went well
>> until I rebooted
43 matches
Mail list logo
