On 7 February 2013 18:40, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> Ports are largely independent of the base system, and their compilation
>> flags are different from port to port. You could set -fstack-protector
>> for your ports in either make.conf or ports.conf, if you wanted.
>
> Is there any work being done
On 08/02/2013 01:05, Janusz Bulik wrote:
> Hello,
> I've got a little problem with NFSv4 + Kerberos. I can do a mount with
> Kerberos with a valid ticket, but read-only.
> After the mount -vvv -t nfs -o nfsv4,sec=krb5 nfsserver:/ /mount_test/
> I got "Permission denied" message when I try to mkdir
Janusz Bulik wrote:
> Hello,
> I've got a little problem with NFSv4 + Kerberos. I can do a mount with
> Kerberos with a valid ticket, but read-only.
> After the mount -vvv -t nfs -o nfsv4,sec=krb5 nfsserver:/ /mount_test/
> I can see:
>
> #klist:
> Feb 6 07:22:47 Feb 6 17:22:43 nfs/nfsserver@my.do
> There is a posting public about Intel ethernet adapters and their
> packets of death:
>
> http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html
>
> Now, how can we test the EEPROM from FreeBSD, similar to the
> ethtool of Linux ?
There is no such tool.
If you want to dump EEPROM contents, you c
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2013-02-07 20:42, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>>
>> Does the -fstack-protector option work on CLANG 3.1 and 3.2?
>
>
> Yes, it works with both clang and gcc.
>
Good to know thank you!
>
>> There is thread on FreeBSD forums about the stack pro
Hi Kimmo,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:06:49PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2013-02-07 20:42, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> > Does the -fstack-protector option work on CLANG 3.1 and 3.2?
>
> Yes, it works with both clang and gcc.
>
>
> > There is thread on FreeBSD forums about the stack protector
On 2013-02-07 20:42, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
Does the -fstack-protector option work on CLANG 3.1 and 3.2?
Yes, it works with both clang and gcc.
There is thread on FreeBSD forums about the stack protector and ports
and I'm wondering if it's possible to use the -fstack-protector option
with CLA
Hello,
Does the -fstack-protector option work on CLANG 3.1 and 3.2?
There is thread on FreeBSD forums about the stack protector and ports
and I'm wondering if it's possible to use the -fstack-protector option
with CLANG.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36927
-Kimmo
__
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:28:30 pm Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 07.02.2013 13:16, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Can you get pciconf -lc output?
> Here:
>
> hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x
> chip=0x11308086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
> cap 09[88] = vendor (length 4) Intel
On 07.02.2013 13:16, John Baldwin wrote:
Can you get pciconf -lc output?
Here:
hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x
chip=0x11308086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
cap 09[88] = vendor (length 4) Intel cap 15 version 1
cap 02[a0] = AGP 4x 2x 1x SBA disabled
pcib1@pci
On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 1:24:57 am Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 05.02.2013 23:38, Mikhail T. wrote:
> > What happened between 6.x and 7.x?
> Ok, what happened is that "device cpufreq" is now in GENERIC and the
> ichss0 along with it.
>
> Setting
>
> set hint.ichss.0.disabled=1
>
> on the
If the pool is created as v28 in FreeBSD, then you will be able to import
the pool into Solaris 10 or 11 without any issues.
Just be sure to ignore all the "your pool is outdated messages", and do
*NOT* upgrade your pool to ZFSv32 in Solaris. If you do that, you will not
be able to import the poo
Hi!
There is a posting public about Intel ethernet adapters and their
packets of death:
http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html
Now, how can we test the EEPROM from FreeBSD, similar to the
ethtool of Linux ?
Thanks for any pointer!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hello,
I've got a little problem with NFSv4 + Kerberos. I can do a mount with
Kerberos with a valid ticket, but read-only.
After the mount -vvv -t nfs -o nfsv4,sec=krb5 nfsserver:/ /mount_test/
I can see:
#klist:
Feb 6 07:22:47 Feb 6 17:22:43 nfs/nfsserver@my.domain
#/var/heimdal/kdc.log:
07.02.2013 14:16, Eugene M. Zheganin:
Hi.
Is the FreeBSD v28 zfs fully compatible with solaris zfs ? I need to
switch disks between servers, these disks are SAN disks, and it's about
20T of data. I don't want to lose them. I am aware that our zfs is
compatible with Solaris, but I just want to be
Hi.
Is the FreeBSD v28 zfs fully compatible with solaris zfs ? I need to
switch disks between servers, these disks are SAN disks, and it's about
20T of data. I don't want to lose them. I am aware that our zfs is
compatible with Solaris, but I just want to be sure, like really really
sure. Of cours
Hello :-)
I have a problem with HP USB Pendrive 8GB memory - it works on Windows
and Linux but it does not detect on FreeBSD 9.1(-RC3):
ugen1.7: at usbus1
umass0: on usbus1
umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0100
umass0:5:0:-1: Attached to scbus5
(probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 1
On 07/02/2013 09:55, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Without so much as a stack trace there is nothing to chew on.
> A useable vmcore would be better.
>
> Did you perhaps use kgdb with a mismatching kernel?
>
I don't remember, I just rebuild a new kernel and will provide more info
if panic occurs again
Without so much as a stack trace there is nothing to chew on.
A useable vmcore would be better.
Did you perhaps use kgdb with a mismatching kernel?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Sorry, I meant to include that with my previous mail.
echo $version
tcsh 6.18.01 (Astron) 2012-02-14 (x86_64-unknown-linux) options
wide,nls,dl,al,kan,rh,nd,color,filec
Let me know if you need any more info.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Thank you very
20 matches
Mail list logo
