On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:12:39PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Does anyone have a clue why new ld(1) plays so badly with our system
toolchain on 8.x (at least)?
Maybe because there is almost 10 years difference between those
implementations? :-)
In any case, to figure out what is
In the previous version (0.61), the process of checking
file names against the list of known files in the
repository was inefficient and most likely accounts for
the slow down you're seeing. I've reimplemented it using
a binary search tree and the lookup phase is no longer a
here is what I used to use (not 100% match, but quite close):
indent -bad -bap -bbb -d4 -di1 -fc1 -i4 -nip -npsl -nut $*
--
Markiyan.
On 13.04.2013 02:38, John Mehr wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:14:57 PM UTC+6,
The only thing I would like to add -- tree lookup did make a good effect
on CPU consumption.
--
Markiyan.
On 13.04.2013 10:38, mrb...@gmail.com wrote:
In the previous version (0.61), the process of checking
file names against the list of known files in the
repository was inefficient and most
On 13.04.2013 11:29, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
The only thing I would like to add -- tree lookup did make a good effect
on CPU consumption.
John,
I'm just curious, did you consider sys/tree.h for tree implementation? I
realize that it wouldn't be well portable to Linux. Any way, did you
have
On Apr 13, 2013, at 03:15, dparussa...@baysidegrp.com.au wrote:
I am having issues compiling gnutls-2.12.23 on Freebsd 6.4 stable
platform. Please find the following errors.
Any help much appropriated.
checking whether wchar.h uses 'inline' correctly... no
configure: error: wchar.h cannot
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Phil Kulin sch...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/12/26 Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com:
I've revised the patch again and updated it at gihub,
https://gist.github.com/4362018. It can now be
Hi --
On 13.04.2013, at 14:29, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
[great deal of simplification by ipv6_addrs_IF]
Sorry to resurrect this thread but since nothing has happened in about
three months I have to ask: What can I do to have this commited to
HEAD?
+1
Nowadays -where IPv6
Thanks Dimitry,
I've tried with the ENV variable in the Makefile. But still getting the
same error.
Any other ideas? I need to get the gnutls working on this system.
Cheers,
On Sat, April 13, 2013 21:52, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On Apr 13, 2013, at 03:15, dparussa...@baysidegrp.com.au wrote:
I
To follow-up:
I installed 9.1-RELEASE last night, then went and cvsup'ed to the latest that
RELENG_9 would give me.
Everything is completely stock, I have not modified any config files other than
filling out the setup questions (hostname, em0 set to DHCP, added a base user
so I can ssh to it)
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:02:17PM +, Chris Forgeron wrote:
To follow-up:
I installed 9.1-RELEASE last night, then went and cvsup'ed to the latest that
RELENG_9 would give me.
Everything is completely stock, I have not modified any config files other
than filling out the setup
Interesting about the drivers - I will look into that tomorrow, I could be on
an older version. I started down that path a little while ago, but when pkng
wasn't quite ready, I just reverted to the old ways/ommands that seemed to
work.
Here is the dump of the requested commands. I will point
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:02:56AM +, Chris Forgeron wrote:
Interesting about the drivers - I will look into that tomorrow, I could be on
an older version. I started down that path a little while ago, but when pkng
wasn't quite ready, I just reverted to the old ways/ommands that seemed to
Hi all
I was updating a newly installed FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE box to 9-STABLE,
and was preparing to install the kernel in order to reboot to test it.
However I was immediately hit with this:
# make installkernel DESTDIR=/ROOT/9-STABLE-2013-04-13
ERROR: Required auditdistd user is missing, see
14 matches
Mail list logo
