I'll try it out soon, thanks!
-adrian
On 15 July 2013 14:35, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
> This reminds me of my local patch which I wrote and forgot about deep in
> the git :)
>
> This hack was required to have working USB ports on X61 after resume,
> but I'm not sure whether it's still required bec
Nope, no such joy.
What else can I try?
-adrian
On 16 July 2013 02:16, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I'll try it out soon, thanks!
>
>
>
> -adrian
>
> On 15 July 2013 14:35, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
>> This reminds me of my local patch which I wrote and forgot about deep in
>> the git :)
>>
>> This hack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 2013-07-12 09:03, Hiroki Sato pisze:
> Please let me know if the existing configurations and/or the new
> formats do not work. The following is a summary of the supported
> rc.conf variables, FYI:
>
> Hiroki Sato wrote in
> <201306200229.r
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 6:12, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
>
> What is the current, non deprecated way, to configure IP addresses in
> rc.conf? Let's say for a dual stack, multi IP box I need to set:
>
> 10.0.0.66/28 and 10.0.0.67-78 as aliases and
> fdda:5cc1:23:4::1/48 and fdda:5cc1:23:4::2-f as al
W dniu 2013-07-16 13:29, Mark Felder pisze:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 6:12, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
>>
>> What is the current, non deprecated way, to configure IP addresses in
>> rc.conf? Let's say for a dual stack, multi IP box I need to set:
>>
>> 10.0.0.66/28 and 10.0.0.67-78 as aliases and
>
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 7:21, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
>
> I'm using ipv4_addrs_em0 now (and ipv6_addrs_em0 with Kimmo Paasiala's
> patch), but Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
> hr># IPv4 address range spec. Now deprecated.
> hr>ipv4_addr_em0="10.2.1.1-10"
>
> So I'm a little confused now :)
As
Hi!
Approx. two years ago there was a thread on -stable about MCA output.
See
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-October/064083.html
for a post from Jeremy Chadwick with a link to a AMD paper on
that topic ?
http://www.amd.com/us/Documents/47644A_ecc_embedded.pdf
which is
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 7:21, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
> >
> > I'm using ipv4_addrs_em0 now (and ipv6_addrs_em0 with Kimmo Paasiala's
> > patch), but Hiroki Sato wrote:
> >
> > hr># IPv4 address range spec. Now deprecated.
> > hr>ipv
Op maandag 15 juli 2013 schreef Alfred Perlstein (alf...@ixsystems.com) het
volgende:
> On 7/15/13 7:13 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>>>
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrot
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:19:31 -0500, Kevin Oberman
<[1]rkober...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It didn't. 10.2.1.1-10 syntax did.
I'm not totally clear on this yet -- the entire concept of being able
to do *ranges* is deprecated? Or is it deprecated because it's missing
the CIDR?
Thanks
References
> Op maandag 15 juli 2013 schreef Alfred Perlstein
(alf...@ixsystems.com) het
> volgende:
>
>> On 7/15/13 7:13 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>>
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
Le Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:05:55 +0300,
Konstantin Belousov a écrit :
Hello,
Thanks Konstantin. I'm trying your patch and that looks better.
poudriere runs since 3 hours now (before the box paniced few minutes
after I start a poudriere bulk)
(I've removed the previous change to panic on the warning
Sato-san,
You have provided a very useful summary of ifconfig parameters for rc.conf.
However, you are missing one example that would provide
clearer understanding. Would you please advise if
ipv4_addr_em0="10.2.1.1-10/32"
is deprecated, backward compatible or remains valid into the future?
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:14:38 -0700
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Nope, no such joy.
>
> What else can I try?
Maybe sysctl dev.[uoex]hci.*.wake=1 works.
Other than that I have out of my ideas :(...
> -adrian
>
> On 16 July 2013 02:16, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > I'll try it out soon, thanks!
> >
> >
> >
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:05:55 +0300,
> Konstantin Belousov a ?crit :
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks Konstantin. I'm trying your patch and that looks better.
> poudriere runs since 3 hours now (before the box paniced few minutes
> after
15 matches
Mail list logo