Re: another? NFS deadlock on 9.2-PRERELEASE

2013-08-28 Thread Daniel Braniss
Daniel Braniss wrote: Daniel Braniss wrote: Daniel Braniss wrote: I upgraded our web server, and only after 3 hours it hung :-( (as a side note, I have 2 other web servers, also running 9.2 doing great :-) go figure. anyways, in

Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.

2013-08-28 Thread Ivan Voras
On 28/08/2013 05:58, Robert Burmeister wrote: On 8/27/2013 9:40 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 27 August 2013 16:41, Robert Burmeister robert.burmeis...@utoledo.edu wrote: I have been experimenting with dirhash settings, and have scoured the internet for other peoples' experience with it.

Re: make buildworld fails 9.2 PRERELEASE to RC3

2013-08-28 Thread Johan Hendriks
Johan Hendriks wrote: Alex V. Petrov wrote: before 'make buildworld' need: cd /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc make obj make depend make make install 2013/8/27 Johan Hendriks joh.hendr...@gmail.com mailto:joh.hendr...@gmail.com Hello all I am running the following version of FreeBSD

State of Unicode collation support in FreeBSD?

2013-08-28 Thread Wolfgang Zenker
[crossposted to -stable and -i18n, replies directed to -stable] Hi everyone, could someone point me to infos regarding Unicode collation support in FreeBSD? All I could find was https://wiki.freebsd.org/KonradJankowski/Collation but that page has not been changed in more than two years. Looking

Re: virtualbox crashes r254557

2013-08-28 Thread Shawn Webb
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote: On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:59:19 +0200 David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote: Yes you can paste the dump here kaa.mimar.rs dumped core - see /var/crash/vmcore.1 Tue Aug 27 12:34:13 CEST 2013 FreeBSD

9-STABLE panic on intensive fork

2013-08-28 Thread Dmitry Sivachenko
Hello! I am using very recent FreeBSD-9-STABLE snapshot: 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r254986: Wed Aug 28 17:18:57 MSK 2013 I run uwsgi program (ports/www/uwsgi) on that machine. When uwsgi starts, it forks pre-configured number of worker processes. If I raise workers parameter high

Re: [HEADS UP] change in devfs path matching logic

2013-08-28 Thread Jase Thew
On 24/08/2013 21:03, Toomas Aas wrote: Hello! On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: This change is about to be MFC-ed. on 26/07/2013 17:39 Andriy Gapon said the following: I have just committed a significant change to devfs path matching logic

Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.

2013-08-28 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:58:10 -0400 Robert Burmeister robert.burmeis...@utoledo.edu wrote: As 64 bit platforms tend to have more RAM and use ZFS, Do you have any numbers for the 64 bit platforms tend to use ZFS? If not, I will suggest that this is just a theory. FWIW, I haven't abandoned UFS

Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.

2013-08-28 Thread Robert_Burmeister
Torfinn Ingolfsen-5 wrote On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:58:10 -0400 Robert Burmeister lt; Robert.Burmeister@ gt; wrote: As 64 bit platforms tend to have more RAM and use ZFS, Do you have any numbers for the 64 bit platforms tend to use ZFS? PCBSD and OSX both default to ZFS for their 64 bit

Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.

2013-08-28 Thread Robert_Burmeister
I believe that increasing the following values by 10 would benefit most FreeBSD users without disadvantage. vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152 to 20971520 vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage: 5 to 50 or 60 vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem is further autotuned based on available physical memory. See r214359

Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.

2013-08-28 Thread Mark Saad
On Aug 28, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Robert_Burmeister robert.burmeis...@utoledo.edu wrote: Torfinn Ingolfsen-5 wrote On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:58:10 -0400 Robert Burmeister lt; Robert.Burmeister@ gt; wrote: As 64 bit platforms tend to have more RAM and use ZFS, Do you have any numbers for

Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.

2013-08-28 Thread Robert_Burmeister
Ivan Voras-7 wrote On 28/08/2013 05:58, Robert Burmeister wrote: On 8/27/2013 9:40 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 27 August 2013 16:41, Robert Burmeister lt; Robert.Burmeister@ gt; wrote: I believe that increasing the following values by 10 would benefit most FreeBSD users without

Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.

2013-08-28 Thread Robert_Burmeister
For previous benchmarks on the effect of the dirhash cache see: https://wiki.freebsd.org/DirhashDynamicMemory -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Suggest-changing-dirhash-defaults-for-FreeBSD-9-2-tp5839351p5839775.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing

RE: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.

2013-08-28 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
-Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Voras Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2013 7:49 PM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2. On 28/08/2013 05:58,

RE: Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.

2013-08-28 Thread Robert_Burmeister
Dewayne Geraghty-4 wrote I'll bump vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage to 60, it's worth it. From the analysis perforned in 2009, and referenced earlier by Robert, this https://wiki.freebsd.org/DirhashDynamicMemory and other material at this site, indicates that the reclaimage interval is workload