On 3/20/2015 8:15 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
For the purpose of devfs, does it make sense to bump timestamps like
normal filesystems for each read/write operation? Looks like Mac OS X
will bump timestamps for each operation but Debian don't.
First question is, what timecounter hardware is
I tried RCTL for the first time, so maybe it is error on my side.
I have system with 2 jail with the following rctl.conf
jail:fox:swapuse:log=32M
jail:fox:swapuse:deny=512M
jail:fox:memoryuse:log=3G
jail:fox:memoryuse:deny=4096M
jail:olymp:swapuse:log=32M
jail:olymp:swapuse:deny=512M
jail:olymp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/20/15 17:15, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> For the purpose of devfs, does it make sense to bump timestamps
>> like normal filesystems for each read/write operation? Looks
>> like Mac OS X will bump timestamps for each operation but Debian
>> d
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:53:42PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 03/20/15 14:02, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > OK, I think I found where the RELENG_10 performance loss happened.
> > It seems
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-10/2015-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/20/15 14:02, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> OK, I think I found where the RELENG_10 performance loss happened.
> It seems
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-10/2015-March/004778.html
>
> is the issue.
>
> Testing with a kernel from r
Mike Tancsa wrote on 03/20/2015 22:02:
OK, I think I found where the RELENG_10 performance loss happened. It seems
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-10/2015-March/004778.html
is the issue.
Testing with a kernel from r279796 I get 76-77Mb of throughput. With
r279848 it drops to
OK, I think I found where the RELENG_10 performance loss happened. It seems
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-10/2015-March/004778.html
is the issue.
Testing with a kernel from r279796 I get 76-77Mb of throughput. With
r279848 it drops to about 60Mb
---Mike
On 3/20/2
I do this:
ifconfig_em0="SYNCDHCP fib 0"
ifconfig_ix0="SYNCDHCP fib 1"
-Alan
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Brendan Inglese
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried that actually and it seemed to run dhclient on fib 1 for all
> interfaces.
>
> I gave up on the fib option I've recently just found a solutio
Hi,
I've tried that actually and it seemed to run dhclient on fib 1 for all
interfaces.
I gave up on the fib option I've recently just found a solution using pf.
Cheers,
Brendan.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:31:32 +1100
> >
Hi,
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:31:32 +1100
> Brendan Inglese said:
brendan> I want to select a particular fib for dhclient to use in rc.conf. I
want it
brendan> to create a whole new routing table
brendan> If I do:
brendan> ifconfig_if1="DHCP fib 1"
brendan> It will run dhclient but no
OK, just to refocus,
I had been tracking down what I thought was a regression between RELENG9
and RELENG10, but looks more like an issue that cropped up somewhere
between the beginning of March and now. For RELENG9, I was actually
using a kernel from sources back on Jan 29th by accident. If
On 3/20/2015 12:49 AM, Mark Johnston wrote:
This is releng9 from today after a fresh buildworld/kernel
I'm not quite sure what you mean by releng9. Is it 9.0? 9.3? Does your
kernel configuration file contain "options KDTRACE_HOOKS"?
Hi,
By RELENG9, I mean checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/
12 matches
Mail list logo
