Re: High Interrupt rate since r279961 on STABLE/10 branch

2015-06-10 Thread Ian Smith
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:43:15 +0800, Yanhui Shen wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, it works! > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/pci/vga_pci.c?r1=284012&r2=284011&pathrev=284012 > > > > 2015-06-11 0:38 GMT+08:00 Adrian Chadd : > > > Hi, > > > > There was an update to freebsd-h

Re: High Interrupt rate since r279961 on STABLE/10 branch

2015-06-10 Thread Yanhui Shen
Hi, Thanks, it works! https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/pci/vga_pci.c?r1=284012&r2=284011&pathrev=284012 2015-06-11 0:38 GMT+08:00 Adrian Chadd : > Hi, > > There was an update to freebsd-head a few days ago from hans - it > disabled PCI interrupts for VGA until a driver claims it.

Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

2015-06-10 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/10/15 02:20, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > Also > > # uname -a FreeBSD pingpongdb 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD > 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 # uptime 2:18a

Re: ssh install with freebsd-update

2015-06-10 Thread Randy Bush
> uname -KU > > I am guessing your kernel is new, and your userland is old, as Xin Li said # uname -KU 1001000 1001000 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: High Interrupt rate since r279961 on STABLE/10 branch

2015-06-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, There was an update to freebsd-head a few days ago from hans - it disabled PCI interrupts for VGA until a driver claims it. See if that helps? -a b On 10 June 2015 at 05:33, Yanhui Shen wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed the interrupt rate of my FreeBSD system is very high (~35%) after > upgrade

Re: ssh install with freebsd-update

2015-06-10 Thread Allan Jude
On 06/09/2015 19:48, Xin Li wrote: > Hi, Randy, > > On 06/09/15 16:34, Randy Bush wrote: >> # uname -a FreeBSD foux.psg.com 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD >> 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Tue May 12 19:33:13 UTC 2015 >> r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> i386 > >> it's really p11

High Interrupt rate since r279961 on STABLE/10 branch

2015-06-10 Thread Yanhui Shen
Hi, I noticed the interrupt rate of my FreeBSD system is very high (~35%) after upgrade from r279138 to r284205. To find out which revision cause this problem, I used a binary search manner and compiled the kernel 11 times. Finally I located to r279961, the interruption rate is abnormal since th

Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

2015-06-10 Thread Guido Falsi
On 06/10/15 12:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> You kernel hasn't been rebuilt then. > > Yes, but normally, freebsd-update provides me with an updated kernel. > > The update provides (among other stuff): > > /boot/kernel/zfs.ko > /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols > /lib/libzpool.so.2 > > so it does

Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

2015-06-10 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > You kernel hasn't been rebuilt then. Yes, but normally, freebsd-update provides me with an updated kernel. The update provides (among other stuff): /boot/kernel/zfs.ko /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols /lib/libzpool.so.2 so it does not touch the value uname reports until a new kernel is built.

Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

2015-06-10 Thread Steven Hartland
You kernel hasn't been rebuilt then. On 10/06/2015 11:23, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I see the same: uname says: 10.1p10 What does the following say when run from your source directory: grep BRANCH sys/conf/newvers.sh BRANCH="RELEASE-p11" ___ freeb

Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

2015-06-10 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! I see the same: uname says: 10.1p10 > What does the following say when run from your source directory: > > grep BRANCH sys/conf/newvers.sh BRANCH="RELEASE-p11" -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! _

Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

2015-06-10 Thread Steven Hartland
What does the following say when run from your source directory: grep BRANCH sys/conf/newvers.sh Regards Steve On 10/06/2015 10:20, Palle Girgensohn wrote: Also # uname -a FreeBSD pingpongdb 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 r...@amd64-bui

Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?

2015-06-10 Thread Palle Girgensohn
Also # uname -a FreeBSD pingpongdb 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # uptime 2:18am up 36 mins, 4 users, load averages: 0,08 0,14 0,10 # ls -lrt /boot/kernel/kernel /boot/kernel

Re: FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-15:06.file

2015-06-10 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Xin Li wrote on 06/10/2015 03:55: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/09/15 17:55, Nick Frampton wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but why was this posted as an EN instead of a SA if it corrects security vulnerabilities? We do not generally issue SA's for local DoS issues (histori

[OpenIT #136287] [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-15:07.zfs

2015-06-10 Thread OpenIT Customer Support (ISP) via RT
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, diese Nachricht wurde als Antwort auf Ihre Support-Anfrage bezüglich "[FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-15:07.zfs" automatisch erstellt. Eine Antwort auf diese Nachricht ist nicht notwendig. Ihrer Support-Anfrage wurde die Bezeichnung [Op