Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #324

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Building "extra" kernels in stable/11...?

On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:56:47 +0200, David Wolfskill wrote: On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 05:45:11PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Well, I cannot reproduce this issue on my stable/11 machine. For good reason. It turns out that I was so *sure* I had my kernel config files (for ALBERT

Re: Building "extra" kernels in stable/11...?

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:11:24 +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:56:47 +0200, David Wolfskill wrote: On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 05:45:11PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Well, I cannot reproduce this issue on my stable/11 machine. For good reason. It turns out th

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #325

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Fwd: [Bug 211141] pkg+pw: doesn't run pwd_mkdb, maybe other problems

I'm forwarding this here so that re@ can see it. Forwarded Message Subject: [Bug 211141] pkg+pw: doesn't run pwd_mkdb, maybe other problems Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:01:11 + From: bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org To: lifa...@mail.lifanov.com https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/sh

Re: Problem with FreeBSD-11.0-Beta1

Filippo, If you missed it, this is a known issue in BETA1. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211141 It was nothing you did wrong, but it does not look like there is a fix at this time. Please go to the FreeBSD Bugzilla and add your report to co

FYI: svn commit: r301453 - in head/sys: arm/arm arm64/arm64 dev/fdt dev/gpio dev/iicbus dev/ofw dev/pci dev/vnic kern mips/mips sys

This is just an FYI copied from svn-src-head: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2016-July/089328.html says the below. I'm just giving it somewhat wider exposure. Likely any replies should be to https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2016-July/089328.html instead of to t