Re: Delay with 11.0-RC2 builds

2016-08-22 Thread Karl Denninger
On 8/22/2016 23:01, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:53:06PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: >> On 8/22/2016 22:43, Glen Barber wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:30:24PM +, Glen Barber wrote: Two issues have been brought to our attention, and as a result, 11.0-RC2

Re: Delay with 11.0-RC2 builds

2016-08-22 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:53:06PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 8/22/2016 22:43, Glen Barber wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:30:24PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > >> Two issues have been brought to our attention, and as a result, 11.0-RC2 > >> builds will be delayed a day or two while

Re: Delay with 11.0-RC2 builds

2016-08-22 Thread Karl Denninger
On 8/22/2016 22:43, Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:30:24PM +, Glen Barber wrote: >> Two issues have been brought to our attention, and as a result, 11.0-RC2 >> builds will be delayed a day or two while these are investigated. >> >>

Re: Delay with 11.0-RC2 builds

2016-08-22 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:30:24PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > Two issues have been brought to our attention, and as a result, 11.0-RC2 > builds will be delayed a day or two while these are investigated. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211872 >

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

2016-08-22 Thread Jakub Lach
Unixbench is slower for me since switching to 11-STABLE from 10-STABLE, due to triple drop of 'Pipe Throughput'. Rest looks the same or better. That's all I know. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Benchmarks-results-for-FreeBSD-11-tp6123994p6124304.html

Re: NanoBSD install phase failing for releng/11

2016-08-22 Thread Guido Falsi
On 08/22/16 16:28, Warner Losh wrote: > Yea, this isn't nanobsd specific. Adrian was complaining about it as well > causing multiple entries in METALOG. Outside of NanoBSD i did a "make packages" on a machine without problems at head r304521. Don't know if make packages would be affected as make

Re: NanoBSD install phase failing for releng/11

2016-08-22 Thread Warner Losh
Yea, this isn't nanobsd specific. Adrian was complaining about it as well causing multiple entries in METALOG. Does this happen with any of the embedded images we have in the tree now as examples? I imagine it would.. Warner On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Shawn Webb

Re: NanoBSD install phase failing for releng/11

2016-08-22 Thread Shawn Webb
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:08:11PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > Hi, > > While building a NanoBSD image using releng/11 sources I got this error > message: > > ===> lib/libc++ (install) > install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc++.a > /usr/local/nanobsd/rr-trunk/obj/_.w/usr/lib/ > install -s -o

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

2016-08-22 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:14:23PM +0200, Lars Engels wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Andrea Brancatelli wrote: > > Il 2016-08-21 08:45 Erich Dollansky ha scritto: > > > > > I am sure that some know of this site: > > > > > >

NanoBSD install phase failing for releng/11

2016-08-22 Thread Guido Falsi
Hi, While building a NanoBSD image using releng/11 sources I got this error message: ===> lib/libc++ (install) install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc++.a /usr/local/nanobsd/rr-trunk/obj/_.w/usr/lib/ install -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc++.so.1

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

2016-08-22 Thread Lars Engels
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Andrea Brancatelli wrote: > Il 2016-08-21 08:45 Erich Dollansky ha scritto: > > > I am sure that some know of this site: > > > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=2bsd-7linux-bench=4 > > > > I wonder about the results for FreeBSD. As I do

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

2016-08-22 Thread Andrea Brancatelli
Il 2016-08-21 08:45 Erich Dollansky ha scritto: > I am sure that some know of this site: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=2bsd-7linux-bench=4 > > I wonder about the results for FreeBSD. As I do not have 11 on my > machines, a stupid question. Are there still some debugging

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

2016-08-22 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 03:22:35AM +, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, 11:31 AM Mark Linimon wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:57:24AM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > > > unless knowledgable people respond publicly and/or in the phoronix > > > forums

Re: Problems with our libgcc_s.so in base [FYI: armv6 C++/g++6 example under stable/11 -r304029]

2016-08-22 Thread David Chisnall
On 21 Aug 2016, at 22:23, Mark Millard wrote: > > On armv6 (an rpi2) C++ by itself can have /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 not being > sufficient, for example with g++6 being used: > >> # g++6 -std=c++14 -O2 cpp_clocks_investigation.cpp >> # ldd a.out >> a.out: >>