On 8/22/2016 23:01, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:53:06PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
>> On 8/22/2016 22:43, Glen Barber wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:30:24PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
Two issues have been brought to our attention, and as a result, 11.0-RC2
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:53:06PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On 8/22/2016 22:43, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:30:24PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> Two issues have been brought to our attention, and as a result, 11.0-RC2
> >> builds will be delayed a day or two while
On 8/22/2016 22:43, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:30:24PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
>> Two issues have been brought to our attention, and as a result, 11.0-RC2
>> builds will be delayed a day or two while these are investigated.
>>
>>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:30:24PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> Two issues have been brought to our attention, and as a result, 11.0-RC2
> builds will be delayed a day or two while these are investigated.
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211872
>
Unixbench is slower for me since switching to 11-STABLE from 10-STABLE,
due to triple drop of 'Pipe Throughput'. Rest looks the same or better.
That's all I know.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Benchmarks-results-for-FreeBSD-11-tp6123994p6124304.html
On 08/22/16 16:28, Warner Losh wrote:
> Yea, this isn't nanobsd specific. Adrian was complaining about it as well
> causing multiple entries in METALOG.
Outside of NanoBSD i did a "make packages" on a machine without problems
at head r304521.
Don't know if make packages would be affected as make
Yea, this isn't nanobsd specific. Adrian was complaining about it as well
causing multiple entries in METALOG.
Does this happen with any of the embedded images we have in the tree
now as examples? I imagine it would..
Warner
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Shawn Webb
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:08:11PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While building a NanoBSD image using releng/11 sources I got this error
> message:
>
> ===> lib/libc++ (install)
> install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc++.a
> /usr/local/nanobsd/rr-trunk/obj/_.w/usr/lib/
> install -s -o
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:14:23PM +0200, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
> > Il 2016-08-21 08:45 Erich Dollansky ha scritto:
> >
> > > I am sure that some know of this site:
> > >
> > >
Hi,
While building a NanoBSD image using releng/11 sources I got this error
message:
===> lib/libc++ (install)
install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc++.a
/usr/local/nanobsd/rr-trunk/obj/_.w/usr/lib/
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc++.so.1
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
> Il 2016-08-21 08:45 Erich Dollansky ha scritto:
>
> > I am sure that some know of this site:
> >
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=2bsd-7linux-bench=4
> >
> > I wonder about the results for FreeBSD. As I do
Il 2016-08-21 08:45 Erich Dollansky ha scritto:
> I am sure that some know of this site:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=2bsd-7linux-bench=4
>
> I wonder about the results for FreeBSD. As I do not have 11 on my
> machines, a stupid question. Are there still some debugging
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 03:22:35AM +, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, 11:31 AM Mark Linimon wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:57:24AM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> > > unless knowledgable people respond publicly and/or in the phoronix
> > > forums
On 21 Aug 2016, at 22:23, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> On armv6 (an rpi2) C++ by itself can have /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 not being
> sufficient, for example with g++6 being used:
>
>> # g++6 -std=c++14 -O2 cpp_clocks_investigation.cpp
>> # ldd a.out
>> a.out:
>>
14 matches
Mail list logo