Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

2016-08-30 Thread K. Macy
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Eric A. Borisch wrote: > FWIW, in MacPorts, we patch clang such that it can find the (MacPorts > provided) libomp headers and library. This lets -fopenmp "just work," > and configure scripts can do their job. The libomp headers and lib in > dedicated sub-directori

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

2016-08-30 Thread Eric A. Borisch
FWIW, in MacPorts, we patch clang such that it can find the (MacPorts provided) libomp headers and library. This lets -fopenmp "just work," and configure scripts can do their job. The libomp headers and lib in dedicated sub-directories to minimize the impact of -fopenmp adding them to the include a

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

2016-08-30 Thread Łukasz Wąsikowski
W dniu 2016-08-30 o 11:35, Fernando Herrero Carrón pisze: > 2016-08-30 9:04 GMT+02:00 Andrea Brancatelli : > >> >> >> Il 2016-08-30 05:51 K. Macy ha scritto: >> >> I can't speak for the whole universe of users, but I think it's safe >> to say that most users are not power users who individually c

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

2016-08-30 Thread Fernando Herrero Carrón
2016-08-30 9:04 GMT+02:00 Andrea Brancatelli : > > > Il 2016-08-30 05:51 K. Macy ha scritto: > > I can't speak for the whole universe of users, but I think it's safe > to say that most users are not power users who individually configure > ports tailored to their needs. I think my experiences on U

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

2016-08-30 Thread Andrea Brancatelli
Il 2016-08-30 05:51 K. Macy ha scritto: > I can't speak for the whole universe of users, but I think it's safe > to say that most users are not power users who individually configure > ports tailored to their needs. I think my experiences on Ubuntu, where > I'm definitely not a power user, are ill