Jenkins build became unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #376

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

FreeBSD_STABLE_11-arm64 - Build #111 - Fixed

FreeBSD_STABLE_11-arm64 - Build #111 - Fixed: Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-arm64/111/ Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-arm64/111/changes Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_11-arm64/111/console

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to > unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB IPMI > emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is this ex

Re: omitting make installkernel in an upgarde between 2 x 10-stable

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:47:26PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > ... > Can't recall the last time I did single user. It might have been more > than a decade now. Here is what I do: > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/buildworld.html > > (And no, "kernel" is not a mistake.) > I (also)

Re: omitting make installkernel in an upgarde between 2 x 10-stable

On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, Matt Smith wrote: On Sep 04 16:35, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi, Reference: From: "Julian H. Stacey" Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 13:37:26 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: Hi stable@ people In a jail, uname -r 10.3-RELEASE-p4, I started cd /usr/src ;

11.0 stuck on high network load

I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB IPMI emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is this exist some way to debug this? _

Jenkins build is back to normal : FreeBSD_stable_10 #375

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Build failed in Jenkins: FreeBSD_stable_10 #374

See -- [...truncated 326676 lines...] [192.168.10.2] out: bin/sh/expansion/functional_test:ifs6 -> passed [0.033s] [192.168.10.2] out: bin/sh/expansion/functional_test:ifs7 -> passed [0.034s] [19

Re: Regression with revision 303970 (was kern.proc.pathname failure while booting from zfs)

On 04/09/2016 17:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > It is only masked when name cache has an entry for the vnode. So sometimes > vn_fullpath() should be broken even if no normalization is applied. Yes, this is true. > OTOH, classic filesystems like UFS do not have any other means to translate > no

Re: X2APIC support

On 04/09/2016 19:29, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > This is possible, of course. But it would not affect "SMP: Added CPU ..." > lines. Well, looking at the code it seems that only if mptable is used, then those lines are expected to correctly identify a BSP. With MADT there is no information to id

Re: omitting make installkernel in an upgarde between 2 x 10-stable

Matt Smith wrote on 09/04/2016 18:21: On Sep 04 16:35, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi, Reference: From:"Julian H. Stacey" Date:Sun, 04 Sep 2016 13:37:26 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: Hi stable@ people In a jail, uname -r 10.3-RELEASE-p4, I started cd /usr/src ; make build

Re: X2APIC support

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:49:43PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 04/09/2016 18:14, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:19:16AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> Kostik, I see one strange thing which is common to both successful and > >> unsuccessful configurations. All "SMP:

Re: omitting make installkernel in an upgarde between 2 x 10-stable

On Sep 04 16:35, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi, Reference: From: "Julian H. Stacey" Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 13:37:26 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: Hi stable@ people In a jail, uname -r 10.3-RELEASE-p4, I started cd /usr/src ; make buildworld, then realised per ht

Re: X2APIC support

On 04/09/2016 18:14, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:19:16AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Kostik, I see one strange thing which is common to both successful and >> unsuccessful configurations. All "SMP: Added CPU..." lines have "AP" in >> them. >> It seems like the platfo

Re: X2APIC support

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:19:16AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 01/09/2016 15:13, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > DMAR: Found table at 0x79b32798 > > x2APIC available but disabled by DMAR table > > > Event timer "LAPIC" quality 600 > > LAPIC: ipi_wait() us multiplier 1 (r 116268019 tsc 2200043851

Re: Regression with revision 303970 (was kern.proc.pathname failure while booting from zfs)

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 04:11:39PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 04/09/2016 11:24, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > On 27/08/2016 22:09, Frederic Chardon wrote: > >>> Anybody is able to reproduce this behavior or is it a local problem? > >> Reverting 303970 solves this issue. gcore and adb works again, an

Re: omitting make installkernel in an upgarde between 2 x 10-stable

Hi, Reference: > From: "Julian H. Stacey" > Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 13:37:26 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > Hi stable@ people > In a jail, uname -r 10.3-RELEASE-p4, I started > cd /usr/src ; make buildworld, > then realised per > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO88

Re: Regression with revision 303970 (was kern.proc.pathname failure while booting from zfs)

On 04/09/2016 11:24, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 27/08/2016 22:09, Frederic Chardon wrote: >>> Anybody is able to reproduce this behavior or is it a local problem? >> Reverting 303970 solves this issue. gcore and adb works again, and I >> can start the vboxnet service. >> I recreated my boot pool with

Re: ue1 and ue2 swinging

On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 00:00:38 -0500 "Eric A. Borisch" wrote: > On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Eric A. Borisch wrote: > > On Saturday, September 3, 2016, Nenhum_de_Nos > > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:05:45 -0300 > >> "Nenhum_de_Nos" wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > On Thu, September 1, 2016

omitting make installkernel in an upgarde between 2 x 10-stable

Hi stable@ people In a jail, uname -r 10.3-RELEASE-p4, I started cd /usr/src ; make buildworld, then realised per https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html I will not be able to make installkernel ; reboot preceeding make installworld Am

11.0 messages regression

After upgrading to 11.0 messages in message buffer to highly interlaced: da18: Fixed Direct Access SPC-4 SCSI device da18: Serial Number 162813454D9E da18: 600.000MB/s transfers da18: Command Queueing enabled da18: 500786MB (1025610768 512 byte sectors) mps3:0:1:0): UNMAPPED SMP: AP CPU #16 Launc

Re: X2APIC support

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:19:16AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 01/09/2016 15:13, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > DMAR: Found table at 0x79b32798 > > x2APIC available but disabled by DMAR table > > > Event timer "LAPIC" quality 600 > > LAPIC: ipi_wait() us multiplier 1 (r 116268019 tsc 220004385

Re: Regression with revision 303970 (was kern.proc.pathname failure while booting from zfs)

On 27/08/2016 22:09, Frederic Chardon wrote: >> Anybody is able to reproduce this behavior or is it a local problem? > Reverting 303970 solves this issue. gcore and adb works again, and I > can start the vboxnet service. > I recreated my boot pool with no properties defined, just to be sure. I can

Re: X2APIC support

On 01/09/2016 15:13, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > DMAR: Found table at 0x79b32798 > x2APIC available but disabled by DMAR table > Event timer "LAPIC" quality 600 > LAPIC: ipi_wait() us multiplier 1 (r 116268019 tsc 2200043851) > ACPI APIC Table: > Package ID shift: 5 > L3 cache ID shift: 5 > L2 ca