On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Pete French
wrote:
>
>
> On 17/02/2018 20:19, Matt Smith wrote:
>
> And thank you for pointing this out. I can now just wait a while to see
>> what comes along rather than accidentally upgrading it and killing the
>> already really slow performance.
>>
>> I was j
On 17/02/2018 20:19, Matt Smith wrote:
And thank you for pointing this out. I can now just wait a while to see
what comes along rather than accidentally upgrading it and killing the
already really slow performance.
I was just looking at this too, and wondering what (if any) the
performance
On Feb 17 11:47, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Reference: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=329462
Do the following new loader tunables and sysctls have documentation
anywhere? I ask because I wish to know how to turn all of this off (yes
you heard me correctly), as not all system
Reference: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=329462
Do the following new loader tunables and sysctls have documentation
anywhere? I ask because I wish to know how to turn all of this off (yes
you heard me correctly), as not all systems necessarily require
mitigation of these
> Am 17.02.2018 um 10:09 schrieb Don Lewis :
>
> It is unfortunate that there don't seem to be any server-grade Ryzen
> motherboards. They all seem to be gamer boards with a lot of
> unnecessary bling.
That’s because few people use servers to build packages.
Increasingly, all the other thin
On 14 Feb, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:15:53AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz.
>> Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores
>> with 3.x GHz ?
>
> In my experience, "it depe
