Re: 4.5 PRERELEASE - Call for testing

2001-12-26 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 02:22 PM 12/26/2001 -0800, Peter/Los Angeles, CA wrote: >Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it kind of strange that >auto-sensing/auto-negotiating must be enabled on both sides for the feature >to work a bit strange? You can't just put that slash there and treat the two things the same

Re: ICQ and NAT again.. :(

2001-11-03 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 04:08 AM 11/4/2001 +0100, you wrote: >Does this work for file transfers too? /me doesn't think so. File transfers >require direct connection, that's what the range of listening ports are for >if I am not completely mistaken... I haven't tried one in ages to be honest, but I don't really feel

Re: ICQ with NAT problems

2001-10-20 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 03:39 PM 10/21/2001 +1000, Kal Torak wrote: >Hmmm yes so it seems... > >Perhaps this is only with newer versions of icq client and thats why >other people have not noticed this problem! Could be, but I've used the port-forwarding method before with older versions (99a) and don't recall seei

Re: ICQ with NAT problems

2001-10-20 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 02:48 PM 10/21/2001 +1000, Kal Torak wrote: >Thanks for the replies, but let me make it clear what I >am saying.. I read your problem.. now let me state that you are mistaken. ICQ does not operate this way. Let me elaborate: The first thing ICQ does is create a connection to the server. Th

latest pcic changes

2001-09-06 Thread Allen Landsidel
Seeing the messages about 4.4 about to go -REL and some more changes to the pccard code, I thought I'd update it and give it another try. Warner.. was the hang-fixing patch you posted here put into cvs, or should I find it and apply it myself before building the kernel? Summary of problems tha

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 01:22 8/31/2001 -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote: > Do a google groups search on "via chipset ide corruption". You >might be surprised at what you find. Just because you don't have >problems, doesn't mean that the problem doesn't exist. Ok I'll give you that much. But the flip side of tha

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 18:17 8/30/2001 -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote: > Yeah. As long as you avoid motherboards with the VIA KT133A/KT133 >chipset and the VIA 686B Southbridge, you're probably fine (not all such >motherboards supposedly have problems, but how do you tell the >difference?). For more info, check

Re: ATA100 problem?

2001-03-13 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 17:44 3/13/2001 -0600, Gerd Knops wrote: >Christopher Farley wrote: > > I'm using IBM-DTLA drives on a Promise ATA100 Controller (onboard an > > Asus A7V). My dmesg is attached below. People from all walks of life, with multiple different OSes are having the same problem. I suspect a defect

Re: cvsup confusion

2001-02-21 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 09:07 2/21/2001 -0800, you wrote: >There is a problem with this approach. Suppose everybody did it that >way. Then at exactly the same time each week, everybody in a given >time zone would be trying to CVSup from their nearby mirrors. The >mirrors would quickly fill up, and you'd be retryi

Re: NFS client ignores "read-only" attribute on file

2000-08-25 Thread Allen Landsidel
At 13:15 08/25/2000 -0400, you wrote: > >>>>> "AL" == Allen Landsidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >AL> server, but my gut instinct tells me it's the server. I would really >AL> uneducatedly guess that the server is not switching it'

cyrus imapd problems resolved..

2000-08-24 Thread Allen Landsidel
I'm crossposting this to freebsd-stable since the people responsible for this kind of thing usually are listening there... Thanks to a little elbow grease and a thanks to retch, I have managed to get cyrus running on my 3.5-Stable box. For those that didn't see my post -questions, in short, I