Hi all.
I have an old FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0 and was wondering if anyone has any
opinion whether I should do a binary upgrade to 6.3 from CD or do a csup
and makeworld? May I run into any difficulties in the future depending
on which way I go?
Or is it perhaps possible to go direct to 7.0?
Claus Guttesen wrote:
could either replace my 10K rpm drives (in raid 1+0) with 15K ditto
which would require a downtime which we could not afford at this tim
I have several times successfully upgraded mirrored volumes with new
disks without any downtime at all. Just change one disk, let the m
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
1. What is more important to your personal use of FreeBSD (the ports
system, the underlaying OS, some other aspect)?
2. How frequently do you interact with the ports systems and what is
the most common interaction you have with it?
Portupgrade a few times a mont
Hi all.
I have a problem with natd, I think. I'm using FreeBSD 6.2 as a
router/proxy at home.
Sometimes (weeks apart) I've noticed that it's quite impossible to surf.
Connections timeout. A continuous ping from the router to an outside
address reveals a packet loss of more than 50%. After some
Mark Andrews wrote:
When looking in the querylog for BIND 9.3.1 running on FreeBSD 5.4,
almost every other log entry specifies an query. The only client is
localhost. I see no reason right now to have BIND wasting resources on
IPv6 requests, so I added
named_flags="-4"
to rc.conf and re
When looking in the querylog for BIND 9.3.1 running on FreeBSD 5.4,
almost every other log entry specifies an query. The only client is
localhost. I see no reason right now to have BIND wasting resources on
IPv6 requests, so I added
named_flags="-4"
to rc.conf and restarted named. Sockst
