It seems counter.h is included before systm.h where critical_* are declared.
On 04.12.2016 16:12, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On recent i386 -stable I got:
>
> ...
> /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbev/../../../dev/cxgbe/t4_vf.c -o t4_vf.o
> In file included from
> /usr/src
On recent i386 -stable I got:
...
/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbev/../../../dev/cxgbe/t4_vf.c -o t4_vf.o
In file included from
/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgbe/if_cxgbev/../../../dev/cxgbe/t4_vf.c:37:
In file included from @/sys/counter.h:35:
./machine/counter.h:170:3: error: implicit declaration of
say so only. They are different entities
differently encoded and cross assigning between wchar_t and char is not
recommended.
>
> On 2016-Jul-11, at 8:57 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>
>> On 12.07.2016 5:44, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> My understanding of the criteria for __WCHAR_
On 12.07.2016 5:44, Mark Millard wrote:
> My understanding of the criteria for __WCHAR_MIN and __WCHAR_MAX:
>
> A) __WCHAR_MIN and __WCHAR_MAX: same type as the integer promotion of
> ___wchar_t (if that is distinct).
> B) __WCHAR_MIN is the low value for ___wchar_t as an integer type; not
> neces
Most recent -stable. Please fix:
...
cc -O2 -pipe -march=prescott -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL
-DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath
-I/usr/src/sys/modules/ath/../../dev/ath/ath_hal
-DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include
/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/POBRECITA/o
are processed): now empty commands are ignored in compat make and are not
printed in job make case
- Bump MAKE_VERSION to 5-2011-11-30-0
On 22.10.2012 20:45, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> And simple test case proving that make v9201206140 dislike empty commands.
> Makefile:
> --
140
9201206140
${CTFCONVERT_CMD} expands to empty string
echo b
b
On 22.10.2012 20:08, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 22.10.2012 19:42, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Sunday, October 21, 2012 8:25:32 pm Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>> Those lines cause this error:
>>> .if ${MK_C
On 22.10.2012 19:42, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, October 21, 2012 8:25:32 pm Andrey Chernov wrote:
>> Those lines cause this error:
>> .if ${MK_CTF} != "no"
>> CTFCONVERT_CMD= ${CTFCONVERT} ${CTFFLAGS} ${.TARGET}
>> .elif ${MAKE_VERSION} >
e for empty
make variables expansion is not merged into stable-9
On 21.10.2012 1:29, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 20.10.2012 16:38, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Friday, October 19, 2012 09:06:55 PM Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>> On recent -stable I got a lots of (see subj) now due to CTF cha
On 20.10.2012 16:38, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, October 19, 2012 09:06:55 PM Andrey Chernov wrote:
>> On recent -stable I got a lots of (see subj) now due to CTF changes in
>> *.mk files.
>> I have
>> WITHOUT_CDDL=yes
>> in my /etc/src.conf and WITHOUT_CDDL
On 20.10.2012 5:06, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On recent -stable I got a lots of (see subj) now due to CTF changes in
> *.mk files.
> I have
> WITHOUT_CDDL=yes
> in my /etc/src.conf and WITHOUT_CDDL have wider scope than WITHOUT_CTF
> suggested, but WITHOUT_CDDL is not checked in
On recent -stable I got a lots of (see subj) now due to CTF changes in
*.mk files.
I have
WITHOUT_CDDL=yes
in my /etc/src.conf and WITHOUT_CDDL have wider scope than WITHOUT_CTF
suggested, but WITHOUT_CDDL is not checked in recent CTF changes.
Please fix this thing.
Increasing it even up to 64m does not help at all.
Solved by reducing swap partition size to the recommended amount (swapoff,
gpart resize, reboot)
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:34:08PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> I have kern.maxswzone default (32m), and now start to see this mess
I have kern.maxswzone default (32m), and now start to see this message:
warning: total configured swap (1048576 pages) exceeds maximum recommended
amount (995904 pages).
warning: increase kern.maxswzone or reduce amount of swap.
As I read somewhere 32m of maxswzone is enough up to 7Gb of swap,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:51:47PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 02:37:52 +, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > On 13/12/2011 09:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > > I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine (Pentium
> > > 4) in very visible
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:22:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>
> >> If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the problem
> >> has Core2Duo, or in a piece of code that uses the ULE scheduler.
> >
&
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40:48AM +0200, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > On 12/12/2011 05:47, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > > Do we have any proof at hand for such cases where SCHED_ULE performs
> > > much better than SCHED_4BSD?
> >
> > I complained about poor interactive performance of ULE in a desktop
> > e
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:23:32AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> It seems 2.1.25 requires to cast to sasl_callback_ft. How about the
> attached patch?
Thanx, it works now. IMHO it should be MFCed to stable-9 ASAP (and to
sendmail trunk too).
--
http://ache.vniz.net/
__
This is for 9 BETA2 or 10-CURRENT.
Please fix it on either side. Apparently minor types mismatch within
sasl_callback_t type.
cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4
-I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src
-I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -DNEWDB
-DTCPWRAPP
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:55:20PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> For PuTTY, most users have it incorrectly set to "xterm"(*).
> There are no clues - so I added the environment variable to help.
BTW, we have "putty" terminal entry for that purpose.
--
http://ache.pp.ru/
pgpKG6sfVF1Fr.pgp
Descri
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 12:58:33PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> нед?ля 24 вересень 2006 04:43, Hiroki Sato написав:
> > mi> Could a committer with interest in -stable, please, see to it, that
> > mi> Andrey's recent change to getopt_long makes it into 6.2-RELEASE?
> > mi>
> > mi> The change make
21 matches
Mail list logo
