On 01/25/2013 10:29 AM, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
Hello again :)
Here's my update on these spontaneous reboots after less than a week since
I've updated to stable/9.
First two days the system was running fine with no reboots happening, so I
though that this update actually fixed it, but I
On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
Seems not working :)
Works here!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
On 01/08/2013 09:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
2013/1/8 Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl mailto:b.smee...@ose.nl
On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
Seems not working :)
Works here!
Hm, could you look
On 01/08/2013 09:37 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:08:33 +0200
Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
Error 503 Service Unavailable
Service Unavailable
Guru Meditation:
XID: 931036950
Varnish cache server
is all I get.
On 01/08/2013 10:00 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:39+0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 01/08/2013 09:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
2013/1/8 Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl mailto:b.smee...@ose.nl
On 01/08/2013 09:08 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
http
On 12/20/12 00:21, CeDeROM wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Prerelease was using -STABLE packages.
Are -stable packages in sync with port tree? Are -release frozen
version of -stable when a release is made?
Magic of enviroment variables...
On 12/20/12 13:40, CeDeROM wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
I use poudriere to build packages for 9.1-RELEASE i386 and make them
available on
http://dd.ose.nl/91i386-default
Thank you Bas :-) I am using AMD64 :-) Anyway I was wondering if
freebsd
On 12/20/12 14:34, CeDeROM wrote:
Thank you Matthew! Good luck with your works! :-)
I will see if I can built them with poudriere for 9.1 amd64 also
But it can take a while
Do you have a list, you can obtain it with portmaster --list-origins
___
On 12/20/12 00:21, CeDeROM wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Prerelease was using -STABLE packages.
Are -stable packages in sync with port tree? Are -release frozen
version of -stable when a release is made?
Magic of enviroment variables...
On 12/21/12 00:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 13/12/2012 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
(On 'pkg check -Ba' producing 'shared library not found' errors for some
packages)
Unfortunately it seems to be a fairly common effect in some large
projects. Other packages showing the same symptoms:
On 12/18/12 16:18, Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all:
Just an FYI that the new distributed audit daemon has been MFC'd to
9-STABLE.
Thanks.
As noted in UPDATING, you will need to run mergemaster -p before
using installkernel or installworld targets in order to add the new
auditdistd system
On 12/18/12 18:44, Chris H wrote:
On 12/18/12 16:18, Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all:
Just an FYI that the new distributed audit daemon has been MFC'd to
9
20121201:
With the addition of auditdistd(8), a new auditdistd user is now
depended on during installworld. mergemaster
On 12/11/2012 12:58 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
Hi,
On an 8.2 box, I run
freebsd-update -r 8.3-RELEASE upgrade
I am getting hundreds of files with conflicts like:
current version
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.4.1 2010/06/14 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $
===
# $FreeBSD:
On 12/10/2012 06:34 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
At 03:41 PM 12/9/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'll amend my stuff that will help list:
* Donate to the freebsd foundation, along with opening discussions to
them about how your organisation uses / relies upon freebsd;
I just had a little
On 12/07/12 21:36, Jakub Lach wrote:
While it's very, very minute detail, I think that in #officesuite
there should be Apache OpenOffice not Apache Open Office
as they were very careful even bureaucratic [*] if I reckon correctly,
when choosing new branding.
[*] They have branding initiative
On 11/26/2012 04:26 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
26.11.2012 16:49, Jakub Lach:
Absolutely not, it's a heavily stripped custom kernel on this machine on
/boot/.
Do you call this heavily stripped? :)
ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5757970 Nov 26 10:57
On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
Thanks!
Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders, especially now,
when SU+J is default.
Add to FAQ 9.4 Which partitions can safely use Soft Updates? I have
heard that Soft Updates on /
On 11/26/12 16:57, Jakub Lach wrote:
As a reminder, this isn't a contest in kernel size :)
Didn't mean to, I just put it there to state that 1.5 - 2.5 MB for a
GENERIC kernel is not appropriate anymore.
More useful would be if somebody would check GENERIC
on i386/amd64 for FAQ update.
On 11/26/12 21:27, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
Thanks!
Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders, especially now,
when SU+J is default.
Please also add:
SU+J does not work (yet) with dump
On 11/26/12 22:02, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 26 November 2012, at 12:53, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 21:27, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
Thanks!
Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders
On 11/26/12 22:15, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 16:57, Jakub Lach wrote:
[...]
Thanks Miroslav Lachman for the reply with the correct sizes for GENERIC
kernels.
Change FAQ 8.3 Why is my kernel so big?
Nowadays kernels are compiled in /debug mode by default
On 11/26/12 22:20, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 22:02, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 26 November 2012, at 12:53, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 21:27, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
Thanks!
Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
Chapter 9 Disks
On 11/26/12 22:27, Schaich Alonso wrote:
On 2012-11-26 (Monday) 22:15:27 Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[...]
So a kernel alone has 12MB, with debug symbols 62MB (12+50).
And all *.symbols files can be deleted (if more space on /boot is needed)
I don't know how it should be mentioned in FAQ.
On 11/20/12 20:25, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 19 November 2012 15:07, Aldis Berjoza graude...@yandex.ru wrote:
19.11.2012, 22:04, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it:
On 11/19/12 18:44, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
The FAQ for FreeBSD needs a significant amount of updating and
changing. The
On 11/26/12 22:42, mat...@hush.ai wrote:
Hi. With the recent delays from the security incident and the three SAs out of
the way, what now are we waiting for? I think we should just get rid of the
release schedule on FreeBSD.org if we aren't even going to be close to the set
dates.
RC3 has
On 11/26/12 23:36, Rick Miller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
Hi
Just modify newvers.sh to 9.1-RELEASE recompile and your on RELEASE :)
Who has a no non-release policy, management?
It's not just management,
checked, they don't have a clue, that's
On 11/26/12 23:48, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/26/12 23:36, Rick Miller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
Hi
Just modify newvers.sh to 9.1-RELEASE recompile and your on RELEASE :)
Who has a no non-release policy, management?
It's not just management
On 11/27/2012 08:44 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 11/26/12 23:09, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Probable addition
8.8 I get a lot of 'spurious interrupts detected' messages on a modified
i386 build kernel and my computer does not work right. What did I do wrong?
You have a single processor computer
On 11/23/2012 12:22 PM, Peter Olsson wrote:
We are currently using cvs for both source and ports.
I have begun changing to portsnap for ports, and I
would also like to try changing at least some of our
servers to freebsd-update.
But all servers have been patched, using either RELENG_8_3
or
On 11/16/2012 05:25 PM, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
I haven't received updates to sources, ports or release for a few days.
The process seems to work, no errors, but no updating.
I seem to remember talk of no longer using csup but I could be confused.
Thanks.
results of named:
On 11/06/2012 09:21 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
04.11.2012 17:55, Bas Smeelen wrote:
To get the sources you can always use csup and set
default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9_1
or use subversion
csup will gone in 3 or 4 month, not a long-term solution I need.
You're right.
For now you can still
On 11/03/2012 05:03 PM, jb wrote:
Eugene Grosbein eugen at grosbein.net writes:
...
My real question is how make freebsd-update download sources they are not
installed?
I am not 110% sure, but you can not.
When freebsd-update runs, it checks its config file /etc/freebsd-update.conf
and
On 11/04/2012 06:19 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
There's an existing checkbox to disable it. There was substantial
consensus for 9.0 that SUJ was something we wanted
Nice to hear. I assume you mean check box during install
process? Not mentioned in install guide in handbook.
So, after I accept
On 11/04/2012 11:25 AM, jb wrote:
Bas Smeelen b.smeelen at ose.nl writes:
...
Can't this be accomplished by setting
StrictComponents yes
in /etc/freebsd-update.conf ?
Then feebsd-update does not try to figure out the components to update
by itself, but updates the components mentioned
On 11/04/2012 12:08 PM, jb wrote:
Bas Smeelen b.smeelen at ose.nl writes:
...
To file a PR it will require some work to find out exactly what the PR
should be about.
Since freebsd-update is meant to update the system I don't really see a
point to make it install sources (or others things
On 11/04/2012 01:13 PM, HATANO Tomomi wrote:
Hi all.
The point is:
There is completely no way to take a snapshot of SU+J partition
unless modify one's kernel.
Whether some issue still exist or not,
how about enabling snapshoting SU+J partition
through sysctl variable?
Would
On 11/04/2012 03:43 PM, George Mitchell wrote:
On 11/03/12 15:09, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
(Please keep me CC'd, as I'm not subscribed to -stable)
I've CC'd Nathan Whitehorn, who according to bsdinstall(8) is the
author (not sure if maintainer) of the code.
This default has already begun to
On 11/04/2012 04:33 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
Just rebooting to single user mode after the install and then tunefs -j
disable /dev/ada0p2 works for me.
After a reboot then I just removed /.sujournal
That crystillized to me as a correct way in this situation.
Just one fsck at the very beginning?
Hi
Why are journaled soft updates the default when installing a new system
from a 9.1-RC2 ISO?
I admit I did not pay too much attention when installing a new system
from an 9.1-RC2 ISO and found out when taking a snapshot with dump (dump
-0Lauf) to clone the system. Other systems (9-STABLE,
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which most people do not.
I didn't until I discovered it by
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which most people do not.
I didn't until I discovered it by
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which most people do
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you
On 11/02/2012 07:31 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 12:27:18AM +0700, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU+J after installing, though it would be nice if the
installer gave you a choice.
This assumes that you know about this flaw, which
On 11/02/2012 07:41 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can disable SU
On 11/02/2012 07:59 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:41:31PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl
On 11/02/2012 10:42 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 11/2/2012 23:47, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Hi
Why are journaled soft updates the default when installing a new system
from a 9.1-RC2 ISO?
I admit I did not pay too much attention when installing a new system
On 07/20/2012 10:18 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
my console is filling up with:
Jul 20 11:08:18 pundit ntpd[1075]: bind() fd 27, family AF_INET6, port 123,
scope 2, addr fe80::f66d:4ff:fee1:f7ba, mcast=0 flags=0x11 fails: Can't assign
requested address
Jul 20 11:08:18 pundit ntpd[1075]: unable to
On 07/05/2012 01:43 PM, Pete French wrote:
So, my work surprise for a Thursday morning is an urgent requirement to
see if we can run a set of FreeBSD machines under virtualised servers.
I have not done this before personally, but I notice from post here
that it doesnt seem uncommon, and I see
On 03/03/2012 04:32 PM, H wrote:
Bas Smeelen wrote:
// away. Binary packages are a big time saver and are more efficient. It
// should be easy for FreeBSD to make it easy to install the most recent
// versions of all binary packages, its beyond belief they cannot pull
// off such a simple ans
On 03/03/2012 10:18 AM, H wrote:
you talk like the wind blows my friend ...
remembering your own most recent words in another occasion what
certainly do not match your last sentence ...
What you 'mis'quote further down was not my writing.
On 03/03/2012 10:18 AM, H wrote:
Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 03/02/2012 07:42 PM, H wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
... and here is the crux of the problem. The vast majority of our
developers don't use FreeBSD as their regular workstation. So it has
increasingly become an OS where changes are being
On 01/30/2012 07:46 AM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Hi,
I have update my 9-STABLE system with csup from 21 jan. to 28 jan. last
weekend.
After building and installing kernel and world and recompiling all ports the
Gnome desktop does not start through anymore. This is with gmd after
providing
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:02:46 +0100
Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
On 01/30/2012 07:46 AM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
To be sure I deleted all ports and re-installed, but it still has
the same issue. The screen stays blank and on the console there is
a message from gnome keyring
Hi,
I have update my 9-STABLE system with csup from 21 jan. to 28 jan. last weekend.
After building and installing kernel and world and recompiling all ports the
Gnome desktop does not start through anymore. This is with gmd after
providing the password or without when just running startx as a
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
What's the impact for your boxes?
I mean, couldn't this have waited and remained undisclosed until monday ?
Best time to exploit is Christmas/holidays
I for one do
These vulnerabilities are known many days before in other distributions .
Thank you very much .
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
you're right, these were discussed on the mailinglists also
_but_ FreeBSD is not a distribution
It is *a complete operating system*
Happy holidays
Disclaimer:
On topic, where do you guys subscribe to know of these vulns ahead of
their release on the ML ?
security, stable and questions
it has been discussed here and there
Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
58 matches
Mail list logo
