shipped with a more performant default
setting, it would also be nice if mindless benchmark drones would quit
assuming that every system ships pre-configured to perform optimally in
their benchmarks.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran
In response to Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com:
Bill Moran writes:
It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is
non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance
improvements can be made in most cases by raising it.
Documentation/discussion
understand your purpose
in spamming three mailing lists with this demand. What problem are you
trying to solve?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
get a card that's just flaky.
Hope this helps.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
.
Do you think playing with randoms' sysctl interface might influence
performance? Does /dev/random automatically re-seed from time to
time or is it seeded at boot time only?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In response to Trond Endrestøl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
plz! go away with all your junk.
I reported it to spamcop.net ... as usual.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In response to Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:12:38AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 02/19/07 20:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:40:37PM +0100, Volker wrote:
The tape sits there since 48 hours
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/108121
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++. If you can live without groff, there may be a
NO_GROFF knob you could tweak. However, it looks like openssl is also
written in C++ as well. If you can live without those two, it should be
doable.
I'm not sure how practical a system without C++ is in the modern world.
--
Bill Moran
In response to Pieter Migo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
please unsubscribe
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Bill Moran
, but you should be able
to set the required variables and export them into the environment prior
to calling the mysql-server script. If not, just create a wrapper script
that sets the required variables then calls the rc script.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc
can confirm that your problem goes away
with the removal of pf rules as well.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
for 4.x
is every 5 minutes. The result is that it's just hitting home for a lot
of people now that it's the 11th hour.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
In response to Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 22/12/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be wrong, but I get the impression that this whole EOL issue with
4.x is partly a result of not reminding people when the EOL date for 4.x
is every 5 minutes. The result is that it's
this will be large
enough that they'll have to go through CURRENT first, then get MFCed
back in to 6.
Keep in mind also that the holidays tend to slow things down, it might
be early January before you get a lot of people looking at this issue
seriously.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc
,
as this will not work if a previous rule allows the connection.
Also how do I block out IPs after a certain number of invalid login
attempts to prevent brute forcing?
There are a number of ports that provide this functionality. I believe
the most popular is called denyhosts.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative
that 6.1 and 5.5 have been
at release status for quite some time, and thus have been providing
ample opportunity to upgrade for some time now? Or has this topic
simply degraded to Troll bait?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable
In response to Michael R. Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Private reply. Not interested in trolling or becoming a troll...
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:58:11AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Are the people making this argument unaware that 6.1 and 5.5 have been
at release status for quite some time
appreciated.
Any development here? We have just started purchasing 1955 Blades and would
very much like to install FreeBSD on them :)
Support for them is in CURRENT and 6.2, although the comment saying
that they're _not_ supported is still there as well ;)
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc
but then bails out
with SerDes controller not supported. Have tried (many times :-/ ).
Ah ... that part wasn't clear.
Unfortunately, I don't have any further information on this.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
time pissing around with kernels. The above error sounds like a
routing and/or port-blocked issue.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
In response to Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/13/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just experienced an interrupt storm on an em device that disabled a
server until I could reboot it.
My initial research turned up this thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd
in the diagnosis on this,
but I'm looking for pointers to keep me from doing random upgrades or
other time-wasting activities.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
IMPORTANT: This message contains
had to tweak anything at all
in the BIOS.
I missed the start of this thread. Did you give any more hardware
details?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
not had any problems. Although
our amd64 deployment is still young, we have several machines humming
away happily. Where did you have problems, specifically?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
you'll need to start:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-online-ddb.html
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
came in this morning (About 2.5 hours so far), with no failures.
This is the first version of the driver that has allowed me to actually
complete a buildworld over NFS.
I will continue testing and report again at the end of the day.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc
nice level, but that doesn't seem to change
much. and looking through ports there only seems to be
cpu monitoring tools, not suppression?
It's unlikely that there's anything you can do in software to fix this
problem. You need to fix your cooling so the CPU doesn't overheat.
--
Bill Moran
://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/
--
Bill Moran
The presence of stale files in this directory can cause the
dreaded unpredictable results, and therefore it is highly
recommended that you delete them.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
filesystem (UDP mount, GigE speeds).
Same here, although it seemed to require a lot more effort to produce the
problem.
I see there have been additional updates to the driver in the past 10
hours. I'll grab those and try again to see if they help any.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc
In response to Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In response to Jason Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Scott Long wrote:
Conrad Burger wrote:
Hi
It looks like there is a new version of the bce driver in HEAD.
When will it be incorporated into Releng_6
. So far, no one has.
I'm working on that now. I wasn't aware that improvements had been
committed or I'd have started on it 2 days ago ...
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
In response to Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In response to Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Conrad Burger wrote:
Hi
It looks like there is a new version of the bce driver in HEAD.
When will it be incorporated into Releng_6?
It will be merged when someone, preferably 2-3
is causing packets to take multiple
routes back at times, thus arriving twice.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:53:15PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
John Baldwin writes:
| On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED
guessing bce is not part of the title?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fine (cf. thread on freebsd-hardware).
Are you saying that the version from that site makes your bce card
reliable? Doesn't seem to address the issues being worked on:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029407.html
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc
In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bruno Ducrot writes:
| On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Hi,
|
| On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
|
|A reboot causes
. I might even be able to get remote
console access to this machine approved for a developer.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only for the individual
In response to Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In my case, it's a bce driver that's doing it. I also have some em
cards in this machine that I can test if the information will be
helpful.
Note that I can _not_ reproduce the problem with an em interface (a
PCI NIC). As mentioned earlier, I can
:umass-sim1:1:0:0): Unretryable error
Opened disk da0 - 6
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/mfid0s1a
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only
In response to Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the power
button cleanly shuts down
In response to Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 12:27 PM 10/4/2006, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In my case, it's a bce driver that's doing it. I also have some em
cards in this machine that I can test if the information will be
helpful.
Note
In response to Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff
In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
What exactly are the last few lines?
(manually
suspect there may be more
than one problem here.
In progress ... I'll contact you privately when it's ready.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only
an amd64 kernel on the system?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Unless it's specifically an Itanium (in which case
an i386 kernel wouldn't even boot) it's amd64.
--
Bill Moran
Many miles away, something crawls through the slime at the bottom of a
dark, Scottish lake.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
shared_buffers = 100
Please help! What am I doing wrong?
--
Alexander Rusinov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Bill
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Bill Moran wrote:
Alexander Rusinov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need to run a number of PostgreSQL servers in different FreeBSD jails.
I managed to run a first instance of PostgreSQL server in a jail, but
after I
access the system when it's in single user mode.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
.
With a networkable KVM like you've got, there is no real advantage that I
can see (unless you're doing kernel debugging, but that's a pretty advanced
topic) But compare your KVM to a typical, non-networkable KVM and you get
the same idea of what I was thinking when I compared a serial console to
a KVM.
--
Bill
with similar complaints about OpenOffice, so I haven't
said much. The problem also happens pretty rarely, and I don't have any
idea how to reproduce it on demand.
I don't think this is _quite_ the same problem, however.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
remotely admin GUI-based servers easily.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Matthias Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fact is, trying to update a running system could result in silent failures.
The system can not replace programs that are in use, so there's always the
chance that something or other won't get updated (cron would
as part of the learning
process. There are ways to restore your system if you've made this
mistake and the above doesn't work, but it's rather advanced stuff.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
available from a number of vendors, and
if you have a spare machine available, you can always hook it up as a
serial terminal.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
The system can not replace programs that are in use,
This is generally not the case. Unix lets you continue to access a file
after
it has been deleted, so long as the process hangs on to a file descriptor.
This lets you replace
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:34:37 -0600 (MDT)
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie Question About System Update
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:32:37 -0400
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
The system can not replace
improperly.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.x, if
you don't upgrade it, you may not even be able to build 4.x, and if it does
build and install, you may find many utilities don't work.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body
.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Jaime wrote:
New info for this problem:
S array.p0.s0
crashed
S array.p0.s1
up
S array.p0.s2
up
S array.p0.s3
stale
Should I just vinum start at the shell?
Well, at this point you've got vinum started now.
I would fix the raid problem before bothering with an fsck, if
it were me.
--
Bill Moran
that cards
usually brag about if they support.
If you have non-sharing cards trying to use a shared interrupt, it won't
work. Crashes don't surprise me under these circumstances.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
; the
manufacturer's web page says its interface is
ATAPI (ATA/ATAPI-5 MCC3, SFFCINF 8090 Ver.5).
The last time I looked at this, the answer was no, you can't
burn DVDs in FreeBSD yet
I just send an email to Soren to see if he needs hardware to
develop with, we're ready to donate a DVD-burner to help.
--
Bill
as crash dumps
to be saved which can be analized with gdb.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technology
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
.
Did you check all 4 CDs?
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technology technical services
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
running U160
at full speed.
I don't remember which version of FreeBSD started to support full spped
U160, but if you're not running 4.4, you may want to upgrade before trying.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technology
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
HDDs complaining about the same thing. Have
there been any patches to the ata code that could affect this? If
so, I'll update this machine and see if it continues to be a problem.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technology
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
large messages to the list will generally not
be received well.
Thanx a lot.
Thanks for being curteous enough to check before posting :)
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technology
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body
the new dirpref code to see if that number has changed.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technology
http://www.potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
become commonplace to do
it.
IPv6 needs to come into use soon. This internet thing is such a mess
that it amazes me that it works at all!
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technology technical services
(412) 793-4257
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted a message to -hackers several days ago, complete with a kernel
backtrace.The panic is 100% reproducible on my machine running the
latest -stable.
Does anyone care? My message to Greg Lehey was rejected by his mail server,
but I am pretty sure he
klein brock wrote:
i don't wanna see this message... does somebody know
how ?
Is that coming from /etc/motd?
-Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Before I get flamed or anything, let me first say that I don't know for sure
that this is broken, but it WAS broken in 4.3-RELEASE. I have been meaning to
cut a CD and see if it's still broken in 4.4-PRERELEASE but I've been simply
overwhelmed lately.
If nobody else gets around to it first, I'll
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Moran writes:
: Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong on this (anyone?)
I've upgraded from 4.0-current to 4.3-stable about a month ago. I
don't know why he's seeing this problem.
Hmmm ... I've had a number of people correct me
Why not 4.4.1-RELEASE, 4.4.2-RELEASE, etc
It's simple, to the point. Implies upgrades. Allows you to quickly determine
exactly how current a particular system is with regards to patches, and
follows long-standing conventions.
Just my $.02
-Bill
Andrew Boothman wrote:
[Boy do I wish I hadn't
Sung Nae Cho wrote:
One thing that makes me uncomfortable with both Linux and FreeBSD is that
unlike Windows NT, both UNIX clones seem to be less secure for a desktop
use. ( ** Note clones doesn't mean it's any less better than UNIX, it just
means, it's not officially considered UNIX by
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Dave Uhring [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just took a look at www.sistina.com and a web site which has its font
set to Arial is suspect, IMHO. If they have to use Microsoft products
to produce a web site..
Is that the best you could come up with? I mean,
Juha Saarinen wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Bill Moran wrote:
I know my opinion of Wind River has been negatively impacted by
the numerous spelling errors I found on their web site the first
time I visited.
That's different though -- one person rubbishes the product because
Dave Uhring wrote:
You seem to have missed the critical point of that paper. When the
system goes completely haywire and either crashes or locks up so hard
that a manual reset is required, UFS/softupdates requires a substantial
amount of time to run fsck. If you have a very large
Is there a reason why you took this off the list?
On Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:52 AM, Mike Porter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 07:11, you wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2001 5:07 PM, Chad R. Larson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
If anyone is taking votes, I
On Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:14 PM, Mike Porter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 09:44, Bill Moran wrote:
Is there a reason why you took this off the list?
my mistake (or my mailer's depending on how you look at it). If the
majordomo config file for the list
On Wednesday, June 27, 2001 5:30 PM, Juha Saarinen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Bill Moran wrote:
In a company, alpha testing is done by the developers or other
employees of the company,
Once Upon A Time this was true, but no longer. Viz. Microsoft's
Technology
As a side note: if this is the problem, sendmail will not block
_forever_. It will eventually time out. I don't know what the actual
value is, but it seems like 5 minutes or something, so it could easily
seem like it's frozen.
-Bill
Mike Tancsa wrote:
The place where I have come across this
I seem to be "memory leak guy" this month ...
Is it normal for rpc.statd to soak up 257M (as reported by top in the
size column)? The "res" column shows 542K.
The machine seems to be functioning just fine otherwise. It just seems a
little unusual.
It's a 4.2-STABLE (Jan 8) machine and it's
Jorge Filipe Andrade wrote:
I am to have problems with the memory of my server.
I have 384MB, and I have 200MB of Swap, it simply, passed one week
You should have more swap than RAM.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
John Baldwin wrote:
It is kind of semantic. However, on the alpha it is hardly dangerous. Nor
do we fake a MBR on the alpha (which is what makes it dangerous). The alpha
architecture doesn't use MBR's, but the PC arch does. Thus, having a disklabel
on the alpha is normal, having one at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this single line in the body:
subscribe freebsd-questions
erich alfred heine wrote:
I subscribed to this list, but after reading it for the last few days, i
dont think this is the place to ask newbie install questions. If you
could
Doug Barton wrote:
I think a better question is, why does rmuser need to check the
validity of the username at all?
Should it do wildcarding? If not, it needs to check for invalid chars
that could be used to wildcard.
On the flipside, wildcarding might be nice.
-Bill
To
John Reynolds~ wrote:
Well, I just cvsup'ed 1 hour ago and built world. No problems. That segfault
you got when building perl looks really odd. Other people have said that
segfaults during buildworld are generally hardware problems. Most likely
memory.
I'd be surprised ... considering I did
What I've seen in the UPDATING file seems to refer to 3.X upgraded to
4.X
As far as I can tell there is no special documented procedure for
updating within the 4.X line. Should be able to do everything in the
ordinary way. I've done it that way on the current system.
Along those same lines ...
92 matches
Mail list logo
