On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 02:09:00PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm on 10.3-RELEASE/amd64 and I'd like to use the new linux64 module.
> However, when I do 'kldload linux64', I get:
> kldload: an error occurred while loading the module. Please check
> dmesg(8) for more details.
>
> And I've
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:30:08AM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Last week in -head many fixes where made to the AMD64 support for Linux
> (r283424) that fix among other things www/linux-c6-flashplugin11 not
> working because the kernel is to old. Are there any plans to MFC this?
>
some people
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:00AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Does anyone know what is the status of flash9 or flash10 in RELENG_7 ?
> Following the thread of a couple of months ago, i tried to:
> - remove all linux-* ports
> - set the following in /etc/make.conf
> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:15:38AM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2009-05-28 11:26:51 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2009-05-28 11:26:51 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
> TB --- 2009-05-28 11:26:51 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2009-05
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:36:08PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:03:25AM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:42:29PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:53:34PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > > &
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:42:29PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:53:34PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:05:32PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:11:43PM +0300, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > > &
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:05:32PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:11:43PM +0300, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:52:43PM +, John wrote:
> > > Hi list
> > >
[skiped]
> >
> > Weongyo, please, look a
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:52:43PM +, John wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I configured the malo device as per the manpage. Now I'm getting panic
> after the device is probed as per
> http://www.growveg.org/desktop/DSC_6973-3008.jpg
>
> Is there a parameter I can pass to boot that will ignore this
> dri
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:39:08AM +, Pete French wrote:
> > yes, do ps - threads in state L or LL and RUN are especially interesting,
> > trace of pids 28, 27, and threads wich L on locked chan.
>
> heres the output of alllocks,
>
> http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/~pete/71_show_alllocks.p
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:34:14PM +, Pete French wrote:
> > hi, please type:
> > show lock 0xff0001254d20
> > and then show thread 0xXXX where X is 'owner' of previous
> > output.
>
> http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/~pete/71_pdns_lock.png
>
> That's in Power DNS - which is inte
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:35:49PM +, Pete French wrote:
> >ps
>
> output from 'ps' is here: http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/~pete/71_lock_ps/
> there are a lot of processes as this machine runes the same webservices
> as the actual webservers, just that nobody connects to them.
>
> >sho
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:48:52PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >Hmm, finaly I noted this thread. There is one more patch in the
> >pipeline for 7 that is needed, as I was told. Testing of that patch
> >seems to be stalled, so I am interested in th
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:25:37PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008, at 22:28:58 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > Patches have been committed to CURRENT and should have been MFC'ed
> > last weekend, but haven't for some reason.
> >
> > The port has a PR waiting for maintainer feedbac
13 matches
Mail list logo
