, but it's first time I'm changing
better version and thinking I'm upgrading to worse system than previous
Despite of anything I sayd, we should thank for the whole team for it's
work. I'm sure anybody do all he can.
Dan
--
Dan Lukes
Doug Barton wrote:
The main problem is - 6.x is still not competitive replacement for
4.x. I'm NOT speaking about old unsupported hardware - I speaked about
performance in some situation and believe in it's stability.
I think saying that it's a worse replacement is a bit too broad.
Danial Thom wrote:
The right thing to do is to port the SATA support
and new NIC support back to 4.x and support both.
4.x is far superior on a Uniprocessor system and
FreeBSD-5+ may be an entire re-write away from
ever being any good at MP. Come to terms with it,
PLEASE, because it is the case
. MFC is not automatic even for RELENG_6 branch ...
You should know that best supported branch of FreeBSD is HEAD ... ;-)
Dan
--
Dan Lukes SISAL MFF UK
AKA: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Dan Lukes SISAL MFF UK
AKA: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
