Re: A few outstanding 10.3-BETA2 bugs

2016-02-19 Thread Daniel Bilik
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:46:05 -0500 David Cross wrote: > I would like to call attention to a number of outstanding bugs with > tickets, 2 of them have patches! > ... 4) kern/206231 (also with patch) -- Dan

Re: stf(4) on 10-stable

2016-02-05 Thread Daniel Bilik
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:49:37 +0100 Daniel Bilik <d...@neosystem.org> wrote: >> Should I create PR for this? > Created: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206231 Seems that 10-stable has just entered beta1, so unless some effort is put into fixing this, 10.3-r

Re: stf(4) on 10-stable

2016-01-14 Thread Daniel Bilik
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:17:30 +0100 Daniel Bilik <d...@neosystem.org> wrote: > Should I create PR for this? Created: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206231 -- Dan ___ freeb

Re: stf(4) on 10-stable

2016-01-13 Thread Daniel Bilik
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:04:18 +0100 Daniel Bilik <d...@neosystem.org> wrote: > A week ago I upgraded two systems where stf(4) is used. They were running > 10-stable from beginning of September, with stf working fine. After > upgrade, the address on stf0 stays "tentative&

stf(4) on 10-stable

2015-12-16 Thread Daniel Bilik
Hi. Does anybody run recent 10-stable with working 6to4 connectivity? A week ago I upgraded two systems where stf(4) is used. They were running 10-stable from beginning of September, with stf working fine. After upgrade, the address on stf0 stays "tentative" indefinitely. So far, I've not found