On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:46:05 -0500
David Cross wrote:
> I would like to call attention to a number of outstanding bugs with
> tickets, 2 of them have patches!
> ...
4) kern/206231 (also with patch)
--
Dan
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:49:37 +0100
Daniel Bilik <d...@neosystem.org> wrote:
>> Should I create PR for this?
> Created:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206231
Seems that 10-stable has just entered beta1, so unless some effort is
put into fixing this, 10.3-r
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:17:30 +0100
Daniel Bilik <d...@neosystem.org> wrote:
> Should I create PR for this?
Created:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206231
--
Dan
___
freeb
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:04:18 +0100
Daniel Bilik <d...@neosystem.org> wrote:
> A week ago I upgraded two systems where stf(4) is used. They were running
> 10-stable from beginning of September, with stf working fine. After
> upgrade, the address on stf0 stays "tentative&
Hi.
Does anybody run recent 10-stable with working 6to4 connectivity?
A week ago I upgraded two systems where stf(4) is used. They were running
10-stable from beginning of September, with stf working fine. After
upgrade, the address on stf0 stays "tentative" indefinitely. So far, I've
not found