Re: stable/7/lib/msun/src/e_log2.c missing

2011-08-24 Thread David Schultz
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: > Oliver Pinter schrieb: > >On 7/12/11, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: > > > >>log2() log2f have been MFCd to 8-STABLE (r216210 and r216210) but are > >>still missing in 7-STABLE. > >> > >>See > >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=24955+47747+/usr/local/

Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...

2009-07-22 Thread David Schultz
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > В вт, 21/07/2009 в 14:52 -0700, Steve Kargl пишет: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:45:36PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > > I have another box (of many) running FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2/amd64 with 2 GB > > > RAM and a Athlon64 2,2GHz CPU having 80

Re: perl malloc slow?

2004-01-07 Thread David Schultz
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > One of the assumptions I made ten years ago, was that we would expose > more of the possible VM gymnastics to userland and in particular it > was my expectation that it would be cheap for a process to do some > sort of page-flipping or page-exchange.

Re: Squid memory leaks in -stable using libc malloc

2003-09-07 Thread David Schultz
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003, Anders Nordby wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 08:17:19AM -0700, Mike Harding wrote: > > Squid uses more memory than you assign to cache_mem, this is > > documented in the Squid FAQ, section 8. cache_mem is sort of a > > 'suggested' value, it's normal for squid to us

Re: Weird vmstat -s stats

2003-07-06 Thread David Schultz
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2003-Jul-05 18:55:43 -0400, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Farid Hajji wrote: > >[ ... ] > >>Shouldn't such counters be at least 64 bit wide? > > > >You betcha. :-) The problem is that a 32-bit CPU, like the Intel x86 > >family, can't in

Re: msdosfs bug?

2003-07-06 Thread David Schultz
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003, Andrey Sverdlichenko wrote: > Hello. > > After running this program with msdosfs mounted in /mnt, I got a > file with some garbage in skipped space. Is it a bug in my local > installation/hardware or real kernel bug? [...] > pos = lseek(handle, 1024 * 16 - 100, SEEK_SE

Re: Okay, looks like I might have a *good* one here ... inode hang

2003-07-02 Thread David Schultz
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: [...] > and I have a vmcore to work on here !! :) Yes, this does look promising. Can you look at *(struct lock *)0x8a4ef300 (the lock the second process is trying to acquire) also? It probably points back to the first process, but we might as well be

Re: Processes hung in 'inode' state ...

2003-06-23 Thread David Schultz
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Not sure what all to do, but doing a 'gdb -k kernel.debug /dev/mem', a > backtrack on one of the processes shows ... server has been up 12 days > now, and running a June 8th kernel ... > > #0 0x20f4f0 in ?? () > (kgdb) proc 67258 > (kgdb) bt > #0

Re: system slowdown - vnode related

2003-06-09 Thread David Schultz
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003, Masachika ISHIZUKA wrote: > >> I have still vnodes problem in 4.8-stable with /sys/kern/vfs_subr.c > >> 1.249.2.30. > >> > >> (1) #1 machine (Celeron 466 with 256 mega byte rams) > >> > >> % sysctl kern.maxvnodes > >> kern.maxvnodes: 17979 > >> % sysctl vm.zone | gre

Re: latest kernel issue ... or increased KVA_FILES ... ?

2003-02-14 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, David Schultz wrote: > > > > 'K, but as long as I install/upgrade both kernel and world at the same > > > time, there won't be a problem, right ... ? > > > > Right. &

Re: latest kernel issue ... or increased KVA_FILES ... ?

2003-02-14 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > When Tor suggested changing this to me, he mentioned "This reduces the > address space available for userland processes, but very few applications > need more than 1 GB for data in a single process." ... now, if I'm > understanding this correctly,

Re: whither demsg?

2003-01-26 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Mike Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Oh, I'm embarrased - the spelling got flushed from my cerebral cache, > and of course google (as always) has plently of examples of the > misspelled version. That's why it says Did you mean: /dmesg/ FreeBSD ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: SMP broken on PPro

2002-11-06 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Glenn Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I have had no trouble with UP -STABLE running on a dual PPro system, > > but I'm getting an early panic in UP and SMP -CURRENT on the same > > system. I will post details to current@ soon if I can't figure out > > the problem. > > The problem on -

Re: [v]asprintf leaks memory

2002-09-25 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2002-Sep-25 06:32:19 -0700, David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >2) reallocf(NULL, x) is equivalent to malloc(x), which is the > > source of this bug. Maybe it shouldn't do that. [...] > IMHO, the abi

Re: Updating world with least downtime

2002-08-30 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For a modern system and a reasonable disk, this is trivial. I have a > system which MUST not be down for over 15 minutes and I can do it > quite easily unless I really fumble something in mergemaster. I do > always merge a few files later and tend to

Re: incorrect memory amount detected at boot

2002-08-28 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Antonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > After upgrading FreeBSD 4.6 stable on an old compaq proliant it's > reading the wrong memory amount from the BIOS at boot time like so: > > BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 > Console: internal video/keyboard > BIOS drive A: is disk0 > BIOS drive B: is

Re: SMP kernel: FreeBSD vs. Linux 2.4.x

2002-08-11 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That's what I heard, although I still don't know how the > approaches are different. I read the Anderson paper, but I can't > seem to find any documentation about the FreeBSD approach. (Given > the signal deliver

Re: 5.1 channel sound support

2002-07-16 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Ivajlo Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have Creative Sound Blaster Live 5.1 with digital > output. Is there someone who knows how I can use this feature > ??? Cause I have a receiver with digital input. The short answer is: Yes, but not for free right now. See http://w

Re: strange ATA behavior with -STABLE

2002-07-11 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Bill Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There have been problems with 4.6-RELEASE with new installs -- CD- > ROM problems come to mind immediately. These are related to the > ata commits. I would like to see 4.6.1 remedy this situation before > our reputation as simple-to-install, always-

Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup

2002-07-08 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Some machines will let me in, but only if I enter the password (where I did > not have to before). Others just refuse to let me in at all! I have had the former problem for quite some time. All of the machines in question were running some version of SSH Se

Re: releng_4

2002-06-27 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake dnu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I was reading about cvsup in the handbook and I'm a bit confused. > It said that releng_4 is the main stable branch while releng_4_6 > is for critical fixes. > > So, if I cvs releng_4, do I also need to cvs releng_4_6? Or do > the updates to releng_4_6 a

Re: Release

2002-06-12 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Mike Grissom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry just anxious. Been waiting for 4.6 for a while now. hehe If you're waiting for some particular new feature, you may want to install what's in the tree right now. You are apparently subscribed to -stable, so you will probably hear about any i

Re: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE not easily scalable to large servers ... ?

2002-04-23 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Writing a useful (non-"fluff") technical book, optimistically, > takes 2080 hours ... or 40 hours per week for 52 weeks... a man > year. > > By the time you are done, the book is a year out of date, and > even if you worked really hard and kept it u

Re: very old bug

2002-04-11 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Vladislav V. Zhuk" writes: > >After attempt to write data to write-protected floppy > >(or diskette with bad blocks) FreeBSD die. > > > >It's VERY VERY annoying... :( > > > >Who can fix this bug?? > > Unfortunately, thi

4.5 hangs on shutdown with X running on 2 virtual terminals

2002-04-06 Thread David Schultz
My 4.5-RELEASE box hangs on about every 3 out of 4 shutdowns, immediately following the message syslogd: exiting on signal 15 The box is still pingable, but unresponsive to the keyboard except to break to the debugger. The apparent cause of the problem is the addition of a line to /etc/

Re: Junior Annoying Hacker Task

2002-02-04 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Miguel Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 03:29:50 -0800 > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Terry et al, > > > Let me know the form you want the hierarchy to take, so > > you can stick it into the GTK hierarchy thingy; I'll be > > happy to crank out some