e? The usual
> way is to assign them as /128 aliases, in which case the command to remove
> them would include a "/128", not "/48". I think when you're deleting a
> "/48" you're also removing some routes that the jail host is using.
> -Alan
&g
to bing-bang migrate everything,
ignoring ipv6 is not possible because a lot of the jails interact with
each other with ipv6 (some even exclusivly)
What can cause this?
Regards,
Frank de Bot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.
to connect several times if they use multi-path.
Regards,
Frank de Bot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Frank de Bot wrote:
> Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>> On 1015T2005, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
>>> Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>>>> On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a Fr
Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> On 1015T2005, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
>> Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>>> On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I have a FreeBSD 10.2 server running as iSCSI target. Another Fre
Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a FreeBSD 10.2 server running as iSCSI target. Another FreeBSD
>> 10.2 is an initiator and has several targets used.
>>
>> When I add a target and reload its co
hink it's clear what the problem is)
How can I have the target reloads it config, without all initiators
crashing? Right before the crash the iscsi session drops and reinits
Regards,
Frank de Bot
Related dmesg from the initiator:
Oct 14 20:59:49 host004 kernel: (da0:iscsi1:0:0:0): WRITE(1
ymore.
Unfortunately I don't have an other switch lying around to test with.
Frank
Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
> FreeBSD 10.2 r28 . The drivers is Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network
> Connection 7.4.2 I will start some tests without lagg configured.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Frank de Bot
&
FreeBSD 10.2 r28 . The drivers is Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network
Connection 7.4.2 I will start some tests without lagg configured.
Regards,
Frank de Bot
Jack Vogel wrote:
> You missed the all-important details: OS version, driver version.
> And another question I can think of, do
at else can be wrong?
Regards,
Frank de Bot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Rick Macklem wrote:
> Frank de Bot wrote:
>> Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> Frank de Bot wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a
>>>> jail.
>>>> Because it's a server on
Rick Macklem wrote:
> Frank de Bot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a
>> jail.
>> Because it's a server only to test, there is a low load. But the
>> [nfscl]
>> process is hogging a CPU after a wh
to be happening after a nfs
connection is re-established. At first everything works, I leave the
server idling (it's a test server) and after that the mounts are hanging
10.2-RELEASE #0 r28 is the current running version.
Regards,
Frank de Bot
_
Michael Loftis wrote:
> Normally when jails are added their IPs are created as "normal"
> aliases, so they'll get a /32 netmask when you don't specify. So
> Depending on how you're creating the jail you'll need to specify the
> netmask with the IP wherever you configure your jail. (You didn't
> m
ovide a way to define a source address, like telnet -s, but it's not
workable.
Frank de Bot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-
the CPU (it
makes the system slow to respond too) or how can I found out what's the
cause?
Regards,
Frank de Bot
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a FreeBSD 10.1 system with a raidz2 zfs configuration with 2ssd's
> for l2arc . It is running '10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r278805'
> Currently I'm running tests before it can go to production, but I have
&
17 matches
Mail list logo