Re: Removing IPv6 address causes all IPv6 traffic to stop working

2018-07-12 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
e? The usual > way is to assign them as /128 aliases, in which case the command to remove > them would include a "/128", not "/48". I think when you're deleting a > "/48" you're also removing some routes that the jail host is using. > -Alan &g

Removing IPv6 address causes all IPv6 traffic to stop working

2018-07-12 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
to bing-bang migrate everything, ignoring ipv6 is not possible because a lot of the jails interact with each other with ipv6 (some even exclusivly) What can cause this? Regards, Frank de Bot ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.

Only 1 initiator per target

2017-12-06 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
to connect several times if they use multi-path. Regards, Frank de Bot ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Reloading iscsi target, iscsi initiator panics

2015-10-18 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
Frank de Bot wrote: > Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: >> On 1015T2005, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: >>> Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: >>>> On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I have a Fr

Re: Reloading iscsi target, iscsi initiator panics

2015-10-16 Thread Frank de Bot
Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > On 1015T2005, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: >> Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: >>> On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have a FreeBSD 10.2 server running as iSCSI target. Another Fre

Re: Reloading iscsi target, iscsi initiator panics

2015-10-15 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a FreeBSD 10.2 server running as iSCSI target. Another FreeBSD >> 10.2 is an initiator and has several targets used. >> >> When I add a target and reload its co

Reloading iscsi target, iscsi initiator panics

2015-10-14 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
hink it's clear what the problem is) How can I have the target reloads it config, without all initiators crashing? Right before the crash the iscsi session drops and reinits Regards, Frank de Bot Related dmesg from the initiator: Oct 14 20:59:49 host004 kernel: (da0:iscsi1:0:0:0): WRITE(1

Re: em0 and em1 watchdog timed out

2015-10-05 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
ymore. Unfortunately I don't have an other switch lying around to test with. Frank Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: > FreeBSD 10.2 r28 . The drivers is Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network > Connection 7.4.2 I will start some tests without lagg configured. > > > Regards, > > Frank de Bot &

Re: em0 and em1 watchdog timed out

2015-10-04 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
FreeBSD 10.2 r28 . The drivers is Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.4.2 I will start some tests without lagg configured. Regards, Frank de Bot Jack Vogel wrote: > You missed the all-important details: OS version, driver version. > And another question I can think of, do

em0 and em1 watchdog timed out

2015-10-02 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
at else can be wrong? Regards, Frank de Bot ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: kernel process [nfscl] high cpu

2015-09-24 Thread Frank de Bot
Rick Macklem wrote: > Frank de Bot wrote: >> Rick Macklem wrote: >>> Frank de Bot wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a >>>> jail. >>>> Because it's a server on

Re: kernel process [nfscl] high cpu

2015-09-24 Thread Frank de Bot
Rick Macklem wrote: > Frank de Bot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On a 10.1-RELEASE-p9 server I have several NFS mounts used for a >> jail. >> Because it's a server only to test, there is a low load. But the >> [nfscl] >> process is hogging a CPU after a wh

NFS Client changing it's source address? (FreeBSD 10.2)

2015-08-29 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
to be happening after a nfs connection is re-established. At first everything works, I leave the server idling (it's a test server) and after that the mounts are hanging 10.2-RELEASE #0 r28 is the current running version. Regards, Frank de Bot _

Re: Multiple IP/subnet in jail, source address for connections

2015-08-25 Thread Frank de Bot
Michael Loftis wrote: > Normally when jails are added their IPs are created as "normal" > aliases, so they'll get a /32 netmask when you don't specify. So > Depending on how you're creating the jail you'll need to specify the > netmask with the IP wherever you configure your jail. (You didn't > m

Multiple IP/subnet in jail, source address for connections

2015-08-24 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
ovide a way to define a source address, like telnet -s, but it's not workable. Frank de Bot ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-

kernel process [nfscl] high cpu

2015-05-02 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
the CPU (it makes the system slow to respond too) or how can I found out what's the cause? Regards, Frank de Bot ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ZFS L2arc 16.0E size

2015-03-05 Thread Frank de Bot (lists)
Frank de Bot (lists) wrote: > Hello, > > I have a FreeBSD 10.1 system with a raidz2 zfs configuration with 2ssd's > for l2arc . It is running '10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r278805' > Currently I'm running tests before it can go to production, but I have &