Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
quote it:
I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook.
e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left
Doug White a écrit :
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Jack Raats wrote:
I want to add an usb harddisk.
Acoording to fdisk it's formatted as a NTFS/HPFS/QNX disk
Can I add this disk and still using this file system?
NTFS is a Windows filesystem. You can't install FreeBSD to it but you can
mount and use
Freddie Cash a écrit :
On February 8, 2005 03:31 pm, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Can this be true? Are they really looking to kill the FreeBSD demon?
This borders on sacrilege.
http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/09/1955251from=rss
Read the advocacy archives for posts from
I got problems when trying to compile my new kernel on 5.3-release. I
didn't go to stable yet cause I never did it (really new to unix...) and
I heard that it was better to customize the system first (?).
But when I put a # before lines I don't need like all RAID and SCSI
options, kernel don't
I just try it again cause I didn't want to annoy anybody and it worked! (?)
I left the SCSI lines cause I use an iPod (and it seems to be an SCSI
drive inside).
I commented all the RAID lines and compilation succeeded.
Now can you tell me how to be sure that my kernel conf is optimized? I
no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
quote it:
SCSI controllers. Comment out any you do not have in your system. If you
have an IDE only system, you can remove these altogether.
SCSI peripherals. Again, comment out any you do not have, or if you have only
IDE
Selon Peter Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I recently upgraded from 5.2.1-p{something} to 5.3-p5.
The system seems fine after the upgrade, but I have one problem.
The reason for the upgrade to 5.3 was to be able to compile
OpenOffice, but when I tried to do that I got an error in the
dmake part
