Re: 12-STABLE source update zoneinfo missing build directories

cd /usr/src <...> && rm -r /usr/share/man && rm -r /usr/share/doc && rm -r /usr/share/examples &&\ make installworld && \ make cleandir && make cleandir && \ rm -rf /usr/obj && \ mergemaster && \ Well, that explains it. I'm not sure mergemaster should depend on a unclean tree. -- Sent from: h

Re: 12-STABLE source update zoneinfo missing build directories

Thank you for reply. Files install fine, it's from mergemaster. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-stable-f3932046.html ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To un

12-STABLE source update zoneinfo missing build directories

*** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot [Creating objdir /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64...] [Creating objdir /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/etc...] cd: /usr/src/share/zon

Re: 12-STABLE uname -a misses timestamp of the build

That was very helpful, thank you very much :) -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-stable-f3932046.html ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any

12-STABLE uname -a misses timestamp of the build

Is there a way to restore it? I liked the old behaviour better, it was useful info for me. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-stable-f3932046.html ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis

Re: console-only freebsd

Exactly, I would still use X, just with a frugal wm (dwm). -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-stable-f3932046.html ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscr

Re: firefox compilation problem

Since switch to obligatory rust, I've found Firefox to be very fragile build. My recent attempt with llvm from ports was succesful though. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-stable-f3932046.html ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench scores comparing to 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now) (about 40%). I have never seen something like that, and I'm running Unixbench on -STABLE since 2008. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabb

Since about week 11-STABLE is building debug files regardless of src.conf settings

Hello, I have WITHOUT_DEBUG_FILES=true WITHOUT_ASSERT_DEBUG=true WITHOUT_KERNEL_SYMBOLS=true in src.conf. Nonetheless, in the last two updates I had files removed from /usr/lib/debug/ upon make-delete-old. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-stable-f3932046.html

Re: SVN_UPDATE not respected by /usr/ports/Makefile?

Oh, and WITH_SVN= in src.conf installs svnlite as svn. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/SVN-UPDATE-not-respected-by-usr-ports-Makefile-tp6164511p6169002.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: SVN_UPDATE not respected by /usr/ports/Makefile?

Don't know about manfile of make.conf (since SVN client IS included in base now) system, but maybe https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html will help you. I don't use svn for ports, but you should probably start with an empty directory. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045

Cannot build 11-STABLE GENERIC with WITHOUT_CDDL=true ?

awk -f /usr/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /usr/src/sys/dev/hyperv/vmbus/vmbus_if.m -h cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0 --sysroot=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp -B/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin -c -x assembler-with-cpp -DLOCORE -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native -g -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

I just now successfully copied 38G (second data set) to the same HDD via USB (after it has passed extended SMART), both with UFS2 and FAT32 fs (6 CAM write errors in the second case, but as far as I can see, data is ok). I think I hit something unrelated above, and as I've said, cannot replicate

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

To sum up, looks like I cannot replicate original problem (corruption) with the USB dual card reader any more, and the HDD via USB thing is something different (maybe hardware related as it's exactly the same with UFS/FAT). -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

OK, I just have successfully wrote both problematic cards in the same USB card reader/port as the USB HDD above, using the same data set. The only CAM errors were at the same time as cards have run out of space. Now testing cping between them, but as they are on the same dual card reader/USB po

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

I would think so, if only I would not clone the disk/system via the same USB port mere weeks ago. Moreover, sysutils/f3 fully writes and validates (checksums) 30G+ memory cards via the same port without problems. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/FreeBSD-11-0

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

I'm not sure if it's the same thing. Most of the times the corruption was silent then. Nonetheless, the outcome was the same after newfs HDD with UFS2- http://www.pastebin.ca/3762661 I would 'blame' USB now, if only I did not migrate/clone the whole system to SSD via dump/the same USB not very

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

Yes, HDD and card reader was USB mounted. This time, I've copied about 12G from 38G from internal SSD (UFS2) to HDD via USB (FAT32), then system panicked with CAM errors. http://pastebin.ca/3762654 Apart from that, there are no corrupted files in the way there were with card reader. I will new

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

Moreover, sysutils/f3 was reading and writing with this memory card configuration fine. Which is why I don't _blame_ fs, I only know that FAT + cp -r consistently gave me problems, for one reason or another. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/FreeBSD-11-0-STA

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

Yes, it has happened also with another device. Which was not a card reader (HDD mounted by USB), and I have used the same card reader configuration to copy the memory card content with iMac. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/FreeBSD-11-0-STABLE-0-r310265-am

Re: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

As it shows your interest, I appreciate your answer very much. I was a bit let down then, I had to (using the same card reader), cp -r using borrowed Apple iMac. It worked as it should. It was FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 as in subject, I will reconsider retesting now and filling a PR,

Re: Cannot buildworld r310779 on FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64

Great! Thanks for the MFC, should have checked HEAD too though, sorry about that. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/Cannot-buildworld-r310779-on-FreeBSD-11-0-STABLE-0-r310265-amd64-tp6155011p6155058.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Na

Cannot buildworld r310779 on FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64

Hello, I'm quite puzzled. Emptied /usr/obj, make cleandir and # make buildworld && make buildkernel... svn st is clear. <...> ===> usr.bin/dtc (all) echo dtc: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend echo dtc: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/libc++.a >> .depend c++ -O2 -pipe -march=native

FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310265 amd64 seems to be cpi-ing garbage to mounted FAT32 fs after 10-20 GB.

Hello, I've recently tried to make a switch to a bigger memory card in some device; what I've discovered, is that FreeBSD is cp-ing garbage to a mounted FAT32 fs after first 10-20 GB (depending on luck). What I mean by garbage are non removable 'files' with random names which cannot be escape

Re: bsdconfig

See straightforward guide: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/disks-adding.html Additional reading: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/ssd.html http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/bsdconfig-

Re: Huge hpet0 interrupt storm, but only if HGST HTS721010A9E630 HDD is present at the boot _and_ formatted with recognized fs (??)

I've overwrote the disk with zeroes- storms ceased. But as soon as you gpart create mbr/gpt scheme it starts. It has nothing to do with fs. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/Huge-hpet0-interrupt-storm-but-only-if-HGST-HTS721010A9E630-HDD-is-present-at-the-bo

Should 4K AF disk with FAT32 (newfs_msdos -F32 -S 4096) be unmountable?

Hello, FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r309991 here, if I use -S 4096 the mount_msdosfs complains about "mount_msdosfs: /dev/ada1s1: Invalid argument". Is this expected? See example: $ sudo newfs_msdos -F32 -S 4096 /dev/ada1s1 Password: newfs_msdos: trim 3 sectors to adjust to

Re: Huge hpet0 interrupt storm, but only if HGST HTS721010A9E630 HDD is present at the boot _and_ formatted with recognized fs (??)

No change after a # gpart destroy -F , like something permanently changed after first writes to disk. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/Huge-hpet0-interrupt-storm-but-only-if-HGST-HTS721010A9E630-HDD-is-present-at-the-boot-and-formatted-tp6151041p6151798.htm

Re: Huge hpet0 interrupt storm, but only if HGST HTS721010A9E630 HDD is present at the boot _and_ formatted with recognized fs (??)

Additionally, HGST HTS721010A9E630 was already RMAd once, either it's got a replacement new logic board, or I've got another 'refurbished' one (it's stamped as such), however it did not change a thing. It's firmware is the latest I think. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.104572

Huge hpet0 interrupt storm, but only if HGST HTS721010A9E630 HDD is present at the boot _and_ formatted with recognized fs (??)

Hello, I would like to share symptoms I've encountered to hopefully spare somebody the headache I have now. HGST HTS721010A9E630 (HGST Travelstar 7K1000) is good value now, it's a 1TB 2,5" 7200 rpm HDD with 100 MB/s+ reads and writes. I've hoped to use it as a SSD backup. Environment: FreeBSD

Re: Bogus turbo mode with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9700 (2.80GHz)

...it's a Penryn, so looks like it's unsupported (one year too old). Oh well. Thanks for all replies, very informative nonetheless. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/Bogus-turbo-mode-with-Intel-R-Core-TM-2-Duo-CPU-P9700-2-80GHz-tp6147461p6147683.html Sent f

Re: Bogus turbo mode with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9700 (2.80GHz)

Nice! Will give it a shot next time I will have cpuctl module around :) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/Bogus-turbo-mode-with-Intel-R-Core-TM-2-Duo-CPU-P9700-2-80GHz-tp6147461p6147681.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: Bogus turbo mode with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9700 (2.80GHz)

I've found that the original technology was called Intel Dynamic Acceleration, though it should be only utilized if not all cores working? I'm ok with overclocking, as you've said, it's not too hot and only 30C when idle, just wanted to know what exactly is going on under the hood (as in freque

Odp: Re: Bogus turbo mode with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9700 (2.80GHz)

it by ACPI. If your ACPI table exposes the turbo boost frequency but doesn't implement it on the backend, FreeBSD doesn't know. We just obey what we're told. :) -a On 25 November 2016 at 20:16, Jakub Lach <jakub_l...@mailplus.pl> wrote: Hello, Sinc

Bogus turbo mode with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9700 (2.80GHz)

Hello, Since I'm running this CPU, I've noticed there is additional field in supported frequency (under heavy load)- dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/1 C3/3/57 dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2801/35000 2800/35000 2450/30625 2133/23888 1866/20902 1600/15000 1400/13125 1200/11250 1000/9375 800/12000 70

Re: moused(?) touchpad issue after updating to FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307755 amd64

$ moused -d -i all -p /dev/psm0 moused: proto params: f8 80 00 00 8 00 ff /dev/psm0 ps/2 sysmouse Synaptics Touchpad -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/moused-touchpad-issue-after-updating-to-FreeBSD-11-0-STABLE-0-r307755-

Re: moused(?) touchpad issue after updating to FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307755 amd64

It looks to me, that something in this commit- https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=307576 forced me to explicitly set extended synaptics support- hw.psm.synaptics_support: 1 to use normal tapping. It works now, albeit with all additional synaptics extensions. -- View thi

Re: moused(?) touchpad issue after updating to FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307755 amd64

I'm going afk for a couple days, all I've got so far from moused is- /dev/psm0 ps/2 sysmouse generic moused: proto params: f8 80 00 00 8 00 ff The laptop in question is Thinkpad T400. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/moused-touchpad-issue-after-updating-

moused(?) touchpad issue after updating to FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307755 amd64

Namely, the touchpad ceased to simulate mouse buttons (doesn't respond to tapping). Any pointers? It must be recent, source from few days ago worked ok. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/moused-touchpad-issue-after-updating-to-FreeBSD-11-0-STABLE-0-r307755-am

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

Yes, when going from FreeBSD 6 to 7 on a UP system. The latter was a little slower. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Benchmarks-results-for-FreeBSD-11-tp6123994p6124925.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

Unixbench is slower for me since switching to 11-STABLE from 10-STABLE, due to triple drop of 'Pipe Throughput'. Rest looks the same or better. That's all I know. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Benchmarks-results-for-FreeBSD-11-tp6123994p6124304.html Sen

Re: After 10-STABLE to 11-STABLE source upgrade, user has lost acces to drm (Intel GM45)?

Ok, missed UPDATING entry about 'video' group :) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/After-10-STABLE-to-11-STABLE-source-upgrade-user-has-lost-acces-to-drm-Intel-GM45-tp6123382p6123383.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

After 10-STABLE to 11-STABLE source upgrade, user has lost acces to drm (Intel GM45)?

e.g. libGL error: failed to open drm device: Permission denied libGL error: failed to load driver: i965 .drirc: Any pointers how to fix that? -- View thi

Re: What are current dependencies of cd9660 kernel module?

The kernel had just the same date, though the system was running for a long time and I'm not sure what I could have done as I was focused on something quite attention consuming then, but I don't think it could be possible for me to update kernel w/o modules (I do scripted updates). This module

Re: What are current dependencies of cd9660 kernel module?

Hello again, After a rebuild (so also powercycling), I've loaded the module just fine. I wonder what state the system was before, but now works. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/What-are-current-dependencies-of-cd9660-kernel-module-tp6109797p6109

Re: What are current dependencies of cd9660 kernel module?

I build only needed modules, though as we can see it's not the most robust approach. Sorry for divided reply, I somehow didn't register your full message. I think I was geetting by without CAM just fine. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/What-are-current-d

Re: What are current dependencies of cd9660 kernel module?

Sorry, should have said it's the same version. Thanks for reply. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/What-are-current-dependencies-of-cd9660-kernel-module-tp6109797p6109817.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

What are current dependencies of cd9660 kernel module?

Something changed in 10-STABLE, I had the same config for modules for a long time, and I cannot load cd9660 now, kernel: KLD cd9660.ko: depends on kernel - not available or version mismatch kernel: linker_load_file: Unsupported file type /boot/kernel $ ls -a . geom_md.ko linke

STABLE clang planned update MFC path (3.4.1 STABLE, 3.7.0 CURRENT)

Hello. As of now, I have- FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 on FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE #0 r289058, I wouldn't have taken notice, if mesa related things didn't recently wish for llvm36 available; digging in CURRENT, I've saw that MFC of 3.5.0 was planed after o

Re: 9.2-PRE: switch off that stupid "Nakatomi Socrates"

This thread has wonderful bike shed potential. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-2-PRE-switch-off-that-stupid-Nakatomi-Socrates-tp5845622p5847358.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 9.2-PRE: switch off that stupid "Nakatomi Socrates"

FWIW, I've meant "tribute" not orb. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-2-PRE-switch-off-that-stupid-Nakatomi-Socrates-tp5845622p5845814.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ free

Re: 9.2-PRE: switch off that stupid "Nakatomi Socrates"

To be honest, I had my "They did whaaat?" moment when I initially saw booting after that update, nonetheless when I've got reference I decided that it was all in good spirit and appropriate even... I was definitely disappointed that it was backed down in the end. Now I have orb manually set up t

Re: Some PR never seen to delete

Why would you want to have valid ones closed? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Some-PR-never-seen-to-delete-tp5840405p5840455.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-stable

Re: libstdc++ not found by clang and base ld on 9-STABLE when building cmake c++ project

Apart from it, clang looks _very_ c++ capable, as in building boost and rebuilding os (itself) normally, so it doesn't look broken from this point. Just after some rebuild of OS (1-2 weeks ago?) This on git project started to fail upon linking. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd

libstdc++ not found by clang and base ld on 9-STABLE when building cmake c++ project

Hello, I'm not sure if this is right list, but has anything recently changed which could explain why cmake c++ project (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gemrb/) started to fail upon linking stage (looking like libstdc++ is not included /usr/include/c++/4.2/)? It works normally if passed gcc48 as

Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice?

Actually libreoffice builds with base clang and gcc47 from ports. I don't know about status of base gcc compiler. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-can-t-gcc-4-2-1-build-usable-libreoffice-tp5786977p5788485.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list

Re: And for our next trick (Audio problems, Envy24HT driver)

Why they are showing up if they are not valid? It looks slightly fishy to me. I would try to contact driver author and/or -multimedia. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/And-for-our-next-trick-Audio-problems-Envy24HT-driver-tp5787415p5787868.html Sent from the

Re: 9.1-RELEASE AMD64 crash under VBox 4.2.6 when IO APIC is disabled

As far as I remember, there is no apic option in amd64 kernel, because it's always included. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-RELEASE-AMD64-crash-under-VBox-4-2-6-when-IO-APIC-is-disabled-tp5785747p5786129.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list

Re: acpi resume related patch

Does not apply cleanly for me on 9-STABLE. I've tried svn patch acp(...) and patch http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/acpi-resume-related-patch-tp5780721p5783166.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-stable@f

Re: kernel's make fails in ath module, stable9

...should be fixed, as it is already reverted. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/kernel-s-make-fails-in-ath-module-stable9-tp579p5777864.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: kernel's make fails in ath module, stable9

See tinderbox log, my -wirelesss mail etc. I'm waiting for a fix too. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/kernel-s-make-fails-in-ath-module-stable9-tp579p5777859.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 9.1 file content

There were no changes in releng/9.1 since tagging... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-file-content-tp5773668p5773676.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-stable@free

Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements

Well, now there is release, but -STABLE is still pre, while -STABLE code is already well past release builds ;) Eh, imperfect world... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583p5773408.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

And setting "incorrect" CPUTYPE?=native is arguably better than blindly forcing march flags for whole base build... There are plenty of parts that don't want any march stuff. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-9-amd64-buildworld-stage-4-2-fails-with

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

I have no problems with CPUTYPE?=native with clang and 9-STABLE, on Penryn but I only use it for base. There is no correct CPUTYPE which would correspond to my CPU anyway. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-9-amd64-buildworld-stage-4-2-fails-with-cla

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

e.g. Penryn CPU: $ cc -march=native -E -v - &1 | grep cc1 "/usr/bin/cc" -cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0 -E -disable-free -main-file-name - -mrelocation-model static -mdisable-fp-elim -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -munwind-tables -target-cpu penryn -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -v -resour

Re: FreeBSD 9 (amd64) buildworld stage 4.2 fails with clang: unknown target cpu i686

Humph, so it's not supported, then it's working then it's not supported again. How come it's working for most (I'm not being sarcastic, genuinely concerned, as setting to native is handy)? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-9-amd64-buildworld-stage-4-

Re: 9.1-RC3: xorg-input-mouse, xfce4-panel

http://wiki.freebsd.org/Git -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-RC3-xorg-input-mouse-xfce4-panel-tp5772549p5772798.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.o

Re: 9.1-RC3: xorg-input-mouse, xfce4-panel

xorg trunk repo predates SVN for ports. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-RC3-xorg-input-mouse-xfce4-panel-tp5772549p5772797.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-stab

Re: 9.1-RC3: xorg-input-mouse, xfce4-panel

1.8.1 is in staging area (dev trunk). It will be not in packages distributed with 9.1. They were just apps which happened to be in ports tree at packages building for release time. There is only one branch of ports. hal is less and less used/supported and it was never meant to be used with Allow

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE

Is ORAC some kind of patchset? Unless you see flow of tinderbox errors, -STABLE is buildable almost always. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-9-1-PRERELEASE-tp5772515p5772627.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 9.1-RC3: xorg-input-mouse, xfce4-panel

There is nothing going into "release" what was not in ports tree. (There is no release packages at all, apart from ports that's just happened to be in regular tree at release time. Followed by port tree slush.) xf86-input-mouse-1.8.1 is in dev trunk xorg tree. (see -x11). -- View this messag

Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=174671 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583p5771862.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-st

9.1 minimal ram requirements

Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements for 9.1, has anybody tested it? e.g. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing lis

Re: MFC: Distributed audit daemon committed (was: svn commit: r243752 - in head: etc etc/defaults etc/mail etc/mtree etc/rc.d share/man/man4 usr.sbin usr.sbin/auditdistd (fwd)) (fwd)

I'm guilty of skipping reboots and just running one mergemaster on the end of update... But I update _very_ often. However, I was lucky, because while I was prepared that my usual script will fail (I read UPDATING after all), that was not the case, as luckily I've already had said audit user fro

Re: portupgrade problem after upgrading to 9.1-(PRE)RELEASE

Prerelease was using -STABLE packages. Magic of enviroment variables... http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/packages-using.html -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portupgrade-problem-after-upgrading-to-9-1-PRE-RELEASE-tp5770666p5770897.html Sent from the fre

Re: Question regarding /etc/src.conf

MODULES_OVERRIDE=ath ath_pci wlan ... or WITHOUT_MODULES= ... in make.conf traditionally, but should be possible with .include also. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Question-regarding-etc-src-conf-tp5769677p5769711.html Sent from the freebsd-stable maili

Re: svn revision in uname

This is revision of svn repository as whole when checkout was made. Not release branch. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/svn-revision-in-uname-tp5769581p5769591.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: Help review the FAQ

#missing-hw-float There is no longer npx option in 9 GENERIC i386 kernel, so there is nothing to delete accidentally. Traces of npx on my system (amd64) are: $ locate npx /usr/src/share/man/man4/man4.i386/npx.4 /usr/src/sys/i386/include/npx.h /usr/src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c /usr/src/sys/pc98/inclu

Re: Help review the FAQ

After _following_ recommendations (0600) in #xconsole-failure, there is xterm error as well as xconsole one still. So definitely something is amiss. On the side note, revisited "What security features are present in &os;" should mention ProPolice. -- View this message in context: http://freeb

Re: Help review the FAQ

#xfree86-root There is no Xwrapper (x11/wrapper) in ports tree. (Port is expired, whole answer outdated.) #xconsole-failure Indeed xconsole throws such error, but not xterm -C. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769225.html Sen

Re: Help review the FAQ

#uninstall-kerberos Uh? Reinstalling base will delete kerberos? I don't get this answer. I thought kerberos was part of base? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769224.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Na

Re: Help review the FAQ

I think HAST (hastd) is faq-worthy, as since release 9, it covers area previously vocally missed by some. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5768880.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: Help review the FAQ

Exactly, I assumed mss.c was history already, because I looked only in modules, while there is plenty isa stuff in src/sys/dev/sound/isa still! /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/isa $ ls -a . ad1816.h mss.c sb16.csndbuf_dma.c .. ess.c mss.h sb8.c ad1816.c

Re: WiFi / Hot-Spot Open Source World

1) This wrong list, it should be asked on -questions or -chat, if at all. 2) Your message is too long, and looks like on the first look like nigerian scam (sorry), most people will not take time to read it whole. 3) This is not free tech support, this is list about development of open source sys

Re: Help review the FAQ

Ok, but it doesn't change current primary reason of silent devices (wrong pinout) :) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5768088.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: Help review the FAQ

Closest now would be ancient snd_ad1816, maybe it could be usable with it but it's pure speculation, good luck with finding hardware and testing that :) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5767810.html Sent from the freebsd-stabl

Re: Help review the FAQ

Just FYI, "Microsoft Sound System Specification" probably was meant to be Windows Sound System (?), severely obsolete standard... "WSS was based on Analog Devices AD1848 codec chip with Yamaha OPL3 (YMF262-M) FM synthesis sound chip." Probably already axed, it was supported by dev/sound/isa/mss

Re: Help review the FAQ

#sound-card-support First part is fine, assuming man pages will be up to date etc. Not sure about support for MIDI cards/MPU-401. Is this covered by uart? Don't know whatever was "Microsoft® Sound System specification". #es1370-silent-pcm That's one thing, but most often silent device is caus

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

...so needless to say, I prefer one provided by developer (in this case Adrian's), even if it is laconic. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Will-we-get-a-RELEASE-9-1-for-Christmas-tp5767716p5767789.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Na

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

This is good answer for end users, not so much when somebody is genuinely concerned if there were some unforeseen issues. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Will-we-get-a-RELEASE-9-1-for-Christmas-tp5767716p5767785.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing lis

Cannot build kernel since subr_devstat.c commit

Relevant bit is- /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_devstat.c:295:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'DTRACE_DEVSTAT_BIO_START' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] DTRACE_DEVSTAT_BIO_START(); ^ /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_devstat.c:390:2: error: implicit declar

Re: Help review the FAQ

While it's very, very minute detail, I think that in #officesuite there should be "Apache OpenOffice" not "Apache Open Office" as they were very careful even bureaucratic [*] if I reckon correctly, when choosing new branding. [*] They have "branding initiative guidelines" and held vote- https://b

KMS/ drm2 i915 spamming sysctl

Are there any plans to stop hw.dri.0.info.i915_ringbuffer_data from spamming sysctl? You know, that you can actually use 'sysctl -a'. Since some time, there is no longer /var/log/messages spam for which I'm grateful. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KMS-

Re: Help review the FAQ

officesuite is good, just change OO.org to Apache OpenOffice convert-back-from-pkgng, make-kernel, release-candidate (I think that even major releases are technically cut from -STABLE, as fresh -STABLE branch is made from -CURRENT prior to -RELEASE, but that's minor detail) reread-rc, use-beastie

Re: Help review the FAQ

If it is really mandatory on i386, why there is option at all? According to man, while apic is mandatory on amd64 there is no corresponding config or NOTES entry. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764584.html Sent from the fr

Re: Help review the FAQ

This may be request for new questions, or this can be supplemented partially in hardware ones I think; - new default partition layout and it's justification (single partition nowadays, I believe?) - default block size and it's justification (is it 4K? why?) - NCQ support with ada/ahci - ahci p

Re: Help review the FAQ

Thanks! Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to "Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders", especially now, when SU+J is default. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764360.html Sent from the freebs

Re: Help review the FAQ

As a reminder, this isn't a contest in kernel size :) More useful would be if somebody would check GENERIC on i386/amd64 for FAQ update. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764353.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list a

Re: Help review the FAQ

Again, sorry for confusion :) ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5842267 25 lis 18:32 /boot/kernel/kernel Yes, it could be artificially smaller still, but delegating to modules things I would load witch each startup would be absurd. First size was whole directory with module

  1   2   >