id Cisco switch
up with a 2 hour ARP cache and I can't change/disable it.
Once you verify that the router gets updated, delete the published arp entry.
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing l
On 7/19/05, Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:22:01AM -0700, Jon Simola wrote..
> > I've now failed 4 of 10 SATA drives (Maxtor and WD)
> > in 1U rackmounts, and am moving on to trying the WD Raptor SATA drives
> > (
am moving on to trying the WD Raptor SATA drives
(which claim to be low-end server).
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
* atacontrol attach 2 - to reattach ad4 once replaced
* atacontrol addspare ar0 ad4 - to add the replaced ad4 as a spare
on the RAID set
* atacontrol rebuild ar0 - to rebuild the mirror
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
_
cripts
(jail-x.x.x.x.sh in my case).
man rc(8) has a lot of good points to read through if you have any
further questions.
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
useful to play with that do things like poll during the
idle loop (actual usefullness in any particular case may be void in
your area, many will enter, few will win).
--
Jon Simola
Systems Administrator
ABC Communications
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org m
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:33:12 -0800, Jon Simola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a few 1U Supermicro boxes running dual SATA drives:
> I've run into all sorts of problems with every one, and changing the
> IDE channel settings in the BIOS always fixes it. Which real
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:13:01 -0600, Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a 2 x SATA system here I'm playing with in preparation to move
> over production to 5.x.
>
> These drives have been working under 4.x for quite some time - they're 250GB
> Maxtor disks
>
> ad4: 239372MB
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:51:56 -0800, Brooks Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ALTQ makes no sense of virtual interfaces. ALTQ works by providing
> fine-grained control of the dequeueing of packets on to the wire. It's
> too early to do this when you're still in the virtual interface.
PF does not
I just whipped up this against
5.3-STABLE #1: Wed Dec 22 17:11:02 PST 2004
Would someone who knows a bit more about this than myself give it a
quick lookover and see if it appears sane? I'm mostly wondering about
the splimp() and splx() and whether it's required or excessive due to
the mtx_lock/un
10 matches
Mail list logo
