Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:21:05PM -0500, Allen Landsidel wrote:
>
>>To be able to open a TCP connection to port 5190 on login.icq.com
>
> Does this work for file transfers too? /me doesn't think so. File transfers
> require direct connection, that's what the range of li
Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
>
> Forwarding a different range of ports doesnt seem to work without
> problems either... When I use LICQ on the gateway/nat machine
> and forward for example ports 3 - 30009 to the internal inter-
> face/ip-address of the gatewy/nat machine, file transfers seem to
Allen Landsidel wrote:
>
> I read your problem.. now let me state that you are mistaken.
>
> ICQ does not operate this way.
>
> Let me elaborate:
>
> The first thing ICQ does is create a connection to the server. This is
> an outgoing connection to TCP port 5190 on login.icq.com.
>
> After
Thanks for the replies, but let me make it clear what I
am saying..
There is a problem with NAT and ICQ that causes you to
go offline/online constantly, you probably wont notice
this your self if you have a high speed connection, but
trust me its happining!!! (check from another icq client
runnin
Tony Landells wrote:
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> Maybe I'm just lucky, but I haven't had any problem. My 4.3 CDs
> arrived without any "intervention" on my part. Maybe a bit more
> slowly than I might have liked, but I don't need them at the moment
> so I don't really care.
>
> But then, they do say tha
João Fernandes wrote:
>
> Is there any available distribution of FBSD in diskettes? I was wondering how could
>I install it in a portable PC without
> CDrom :-/
Considering how many disks that would take, I think it would probably
be cheaper to buy a CD-Rom! :P
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
> Ok. The site is up, along with a main page that I was able to spend
> about 1 minute in creating. If we have any web developers who wish to
> enhance the site, feel free to mail me to help get the page started. If
> not, then I will get to it eventually, but I warn that it will not be in
> the n
Mike Harding wrote:
>
> Uh - april fools. Slashdot is owned by VA Linux or another Linux
> related company.
Yeah I know it was april fools, but like I said, the points made in
it are actualy very true... And like you say they couldnt change even
if they wanted to since they are now owned by VA
Peter Radcliffe wrote:
>
> Kal Torak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
> > Hmmm... I would like OpenGL support...
>
> You want xlockmore to go really really fast ?
Some people like to play 3D games you know... IE Quake...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
> > > I'm running 4.3 Beta on a shiny new Dell 1400. The NIC
> > > comes up as the fxp0 device. It is an embedded Intel
> > > pro 100/+
> > >
> > > The light on the switch says it is in Duplex mode.
> > > However, ipconfig -a says SIMPLEX. I've tried a
> > > different switch, but no change.
> >
>
> > Yeah using the redirect_port option in natd works, but I dont understand
> > why it doesnt work with ipfw... I thought natd might be stopping, but even
> > having the fwd rule before the divert to natd rule doesnt change anything..
> > Dose ipfw fwd even work to remote machines?
>
> Yes, it w
Hiyas,
I am hoping someone will be able to to tell me what im doing
wrong with this forwarding rules... And dont anyone complain
that this should go to a different list or there will be trouble :P
Anyway here is what I am trying to do...
I have a FreeBSD box as my gateway / firewall so it has an
David Wagner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, João Fernandes wrote:
>
> > I have a realtek 8139 and a cable modem. I use DHCP to connect to the network
> > and my /etc/dhclient.conf has nothing on it.
> >
> > My problems are:
> > The speed of my connections are way slower in FreeBSD than ar
Pete French wrote:
>
> > I had this problem too a while back, I fixed it for myself at the time
> > by removing the flags 0x1 from the atkbd0 entry in the kernel config file,
> > this can also be done via boot -c and similar, I then managed to fix it
>
> Sadly even boot -c doesnt work - that jus
> Luc Morin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have recently started experiencing network problems on my -stable box.
>
> The last cvsup dates a few weeks back, and everything was working fine up until a
>few days ago.
>
> Strangest thing is that everything works just fine under Win98, and that when I
>re
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Do you have the same crypting algorithm on both ends ?
> > (FreeBSD recently went to MD5 as a standard - Solaris most
> > likely is still using DES)
>
> Yes, the Solaris NIS Server is using DES. However, as we don't have
Rasputin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 05:34:12AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 10:07 AM 1/15/2001 +, Rasputin wrote:
> > >Incidentally, would anyone know an easy way of finding out
> > >what code has changed in the ata drivers since Christmas -
> > >other than mailing Soren of course
Hiyas,
I am just wondering if gif and faith pseudo devices are needed for
anything? (Besides IPv6 stuff)
And what they are for...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Maarten van Schie wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Kal Torak wrote:
>
> > Maarten van Schie wrote:
> > >
> > > You guys talk about a 'duel boot'. But as far as I go a duel is an
> > > opposition. It should be 'dual' caused by the c
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> "Michael C . Wu" wrote:
>
> > "Fully functional" for a desktop implies a working sound card too.
> > This is one of of those things that does not really matter very much.
> > A good server admin will recompile and customize his kernel.
> > And a desktop user probably does
Maarten van Schie wrote:
>
> You guys talk about a 'duel boot'. But as far as I go a duel is an
> opposition. It should be 'dual' caused by the composition.
That might be a nice situation, but as soon as there is more than one
O/S on a system they are both fighting for control, take as a prime
> 2. The Netscape Communicator 4.76 package (from CD 1 of
> the 4.2 set) will not install, complaining about the lack
> of a.out X libraries. The "previous" installation of
> Netscape would not start, leaving a log message of not
> being able to find ld.so.6 (iirc).
>
> /etc/make.conf has XFREE
Philippe CASIDY wrote:
>
> On 28 Dec, Brent wrote:
>
> >
> >"ps: proc size mismatch (30624 total, 1048 chunks)"
> >
> > the machine seems to operate fine...other than the fact i cant do "ps" or
> > "top"this kind of makes things hard..
> > i was thinking of 2 ways to solve this..
> >
>
Ray Qiu wrote:
>
> Kal,
>
> I think the "make install" will do the make first and
> then install if the make hasn't been done.
> Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Ray
> --- Kal Torak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ray Qiu wrote:
>
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to be sure: please post the dmesg part refering to ATA probes.
> Also please post the result of "sysctl hw.atamodes'; if it has a "dma" in
> the list then try a "sysctl -w hw.atamodes=pio,---,---,---" under root and
> check if the error appear again.
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
