Re: gdb broken on 9.1/amd64?

2013-03-06 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:02:22PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > root@ingwe:~ # gdb -p 521 Try to specify the executable binary on the command line. pgpzloJMK22HB.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: IPMI serial console

2013-02-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:18:51AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 22/02/2013, at 9:15, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > >> uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 > >> uart1: <16550 or compatible> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > >> uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef

Re: IPMI serial console

2013-02-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:07:57PM -0800, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On 02/21/13 13:56, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > > > On 22/02/2013, at 2:19, John Baldwin wrote: > >>> Does anyone have any hints? > >> > >> Rather than using all these hints, just use these three in loader.conf: > >> > >> console="co

Re: 9-STABLE -> NFS -> NetAPP:

2013-02-15 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:44:43AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:05:56 pm Rick Macklem wrote: > > Marc Fournier wrote: > > > On 2013-02-13, at 3:54 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > The pid that is in "T" state for the "ps auxlH". > > > > > > Differe

Re: 9-STABLE -> NFS -> NetAPP:

2013-02-13 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:50:13PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > I got it resent from him. I've attached it to this post, just in case you > are interested in taking a look at it. I do not see the voffset wchains surprising. All of them seems to occur in the multithreading process. The usual reaso

Re: 9-STABLE -> NFS -> NetAPP:

2013-02-13 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:50:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > Marc Fournier wrote: > > Just reset server, so any further details will have to be 'next time' > > ??? but, just did a csup and am rebuilding ??? the following three files > > were modified since last build: > > > > grep nfs /tmp/outp

Re: 9.1-stable crashes while copying data from a NFS mounted directory

2013-01-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 07:50:49PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote: > On Thursday 24 January 2013 19:07:23 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:03:59PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:57PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer

Re: 9.1-stable crashes while copying data from a NFS mounted directory

2013-01-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:03:59PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:57PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'm using 9.1 stable svn revision 245605 and I get the panic below if I > > execute the fo

Re: 9.1-stable crashes while copying data from a NFS mounted directory

2013-01-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:57PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote: > Hi! > > I'm using 9.1 stable svn revision 245605 and I get the panic below if I > execute the following commands (as single user): > > # swapon -a > # dumpon /dev/ada0s3b > # mount -u / > # ifconfig age0 inet 192.168.2.2 mtu

Re: zio_done panic on unadulterated FreeBSD Release 9.1

2013-01-13 Thread Konstantin Belousov
> 1879return; > 1880} > 1881 > 1882m->valid = 0; > (kgdb) This is strange. Can you disassemble your instance of the vm_page_free_toq() and show me the assembler listing ? The line you show has nothing to cause page fault if the m poi

Re: zio_done panic on unadulterated FreeBSD Release 9.1

2013-01-09 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:03:38PM +, Po-Li Soong wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Po-Li Soong. I ran into a crash not long after installing the 9.1 > release on my home machine. I was performing a test run of file transfer with > samba server running on the FreeBSD installation. The transfer rat

Re: Post 9.1 stable file system problems

2013-01-05 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 05:58:06PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:39:44PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > > On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > > >>

Re: NFS-exported ZFS instability

2013-01-02 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 08:24:39AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hiroki Sato wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have been in a trouble about my NFS server for a long time. The > > symptom is that it stops working in one or two weeks after a boot. I > > could not track down the cause yet, but it is reprodu

Re: Post 9.1 stable file system problems

2013-01-01 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:39:44PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 01/01/2013 07:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >> On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >>> On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Re

Re: Post 9.1 stable file system problems

2012-12-31 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > > On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote: > >>> > >>> I have a Tinderbox that I just updated to the current RELENG_9. > >>> Following t

Re: FS hang with suspfs when creating snapshot on a UFS + GJOURNAL setup

2012-12-28 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:19:31AM +0100, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > >> db> alltrace (pid 18 and 7126) > >> > >> Tracing command g_journal swi

Re: FS hang with suspfs when creating snapshot on a UFS + GJOURNAL setup

2012-12-27 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 06:47:05PM +0100, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > >> On a FreeBSD 8-Stable machine with UFS + GJOURNAL (no SU) I observed the > >> same behaviour a

Re: FS hang with suspfs when creating snapshot on a UFS + GJOURNAL setup

2012-12-27 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > On a FreeBSD 8-Stable machine with UFS + GJOURNAL (no SU) I observed the > same behaviour as described for UFS+SU+J in > lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-January/030937.html. > > The snapshot was initiated by ama

Re: nullfs changes MFC

2012-12-07 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 03:58:16AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 03:01:09AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: ... > > The merge is available at > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/nullfs_9.1.patch > > > Sorry I haven't checked the la

nullfs changes MFC

2012-12-07 Thread Konstantin Belousov
Hi, I am going to merge latest batch of the nullfs improvements into stable/9. This will bring up significant performance enchancements due to use of the shared locks for lookups if the lower layer supports it, much better caching on the nullfs layer, and proper handling of the text segments on the

Re: buildworld with clang breaks because no cc

2012-11-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-11-23 15:14, Beeblebrox wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. Build progressed a little further then had other > > problem: > > > > ===> gnu/lib/libstdc++ (all) > > building shared library libstdc++.so.6 > > /usr/obj/asp/src/

Re: Increasing the DMESG buffer....

2012-11-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 21/11/2012 18:01 Ian Lepore said the following: > > You know what would be great? Have this value auto-tune itself upwards > > if bootverbose is true. > > This sounds /potentially/ neat. I do not want the bootverbose knob suddentl

Re: thread taskq / unp_gc() using 100% cpu and stalling unix socket IPC

2012-11-13 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 01:41:04AM +0100, Markus Gebert wrote: > > On 13.11.2012, at 19:30, Markus Gebert wrote: > > > To me it looks like the unix socket GC is triggered way too often and/or > > running too long, which uses cpu and worse, causes a lot of contention > > around the unp_list_loc

Re: tmpfs nfs exports?

2012-10-30 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:38:16AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Hey folks, any reason why not to include the following patch in 9.1? It > would be nice to have tmpfs be exportable. > > I'm good to commit it, I can also wait until post 9.1. It is too late for 9.1. Patch is fine for stable/9, b

Re: pty/tty or signal strangeness, or grep/bsdgrep bug?

2012-10-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:06:09AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > 2012/10/25 Jeremy Chadwick : > > I assume a commit to HEAD + MFC in 2 weeks is in order? > > Yes. We're far too late to get this into 9.1, so I'll MFC it after the > release. > > Patch committed as r242078! Release is performed on t

Re: wine, gcc and clang with CPUTYPE

2012-10-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:34:16PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 24.10.2012 13:05, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> I just have taken some time to inspect CPUTYPE support for clang. It > >> seems to me that clang generates incorrect code in some cases. > >> > >> The first failure point I discovered

Re: wine, gcc and clang with CPUTYPE

2012-10-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:57:22AM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Hi all. > > I just have taken some time to inspect CPUTYPE support for clang. It > seems to me that clang generates incorrect code in some cases. > > The first failure point I discovered was inability to build gcc from > sour

Re: pty/tty or signal strangeness, or grep/bsdgrep bug?

2012-10-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:27:03AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed to the list. > > Something "fun" today. First off: yes, I should have been using > 'bsdgrep -r -- "-2011" .', and yes that works fine, but that's besides > the point. Here we go: > > % b

Re: stable/9 @r241776 panic: REDZONE: Buffer underflow detected...

2012-10-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:46:34AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:33:22AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > ... > > So I tried reverting 241749 ... and I failed to reproduce the problem. > > > > Well, one boot out of one, at least. I'll try a few more reality > > check

Re: stable/9 @r241776 panic: REDZONE: Buffer underflow detected...

2012-10-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 07:10:19AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > This seems ... fairly weird to me. > > Yesterday, I built & booted: > > FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #274 > 241726M: Fri Oct 19 05:40:05 PDT 2012 > r...@g1-227.catwhisker.org:/usr/obj/u

Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-04 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 03:29:31PM +0200, Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > Nop, the patch doesn't seem to work - the machine crashes again. :| > This is the whole difference between stable and HEAD nullfs. Retest the HEAD then. pgpCMOX0jlgk4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-04 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 12:29:51PM +0200, Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > Does not compile: http://nopaste.info/2bc2c189eb.html (I also #define-d > a constant, but that works) > You completely strip off the quotes and attributions, as well as your To: address is bogus, so I do not know whom did you a

Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-04 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 09:08:08AM +0200, Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > On 10/04/2012 08:41 AM, Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > > I just applied the numeric-uidgid patch to CURRENT (worked so far) and > > compile the kernel with the patch and try it another time, just to > > eliminate the possibility o

Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-04 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:22:37AM +0200, Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > Hehe, sure, if you assist me :) > I'm not very experienced with SVN, I'm actually a git user and I think > it's also better if I do /not/ express my opinion on SVN here ;) > The only actions I'm currently able to do in SVN are c

Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:26:47PM +0200, Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > On 10/03/2012 05:54 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > So do you use nullfs exported mounts ? And stable ? > > Can you try to remove nullfs from the set up ? > > Yes, I am using nullfs for the exports (

Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS"

2012-10-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:24:11AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > > Another logs - even with a /var/crash crash report :) > > > > Please note: The /var/crash files stem from another crash than the big > > syslog does! > > > > The syslog file inside the tarball is about

Re: rpc.lockd exiting just after startup @r240811

2012-09-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 06:04:14AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > This (rpc.lockd exiting rather quickly) is happening on my home "build > machine"; in hindsight, the first symptom I saw was from the > cron-initiated attempt to perform "svn update" on the NFS-resident > /usr/ports: > > svn: E1550

Re: Killing processes from DDB

2012-08-30 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 07:43:46AM +0100, Matt Burke wrote: > Is it possible to forcibly kill process from DDB which are unkillable from > userland? My understanding is the 'kill' command is effectively the same as > the userland version, so perhaps a process could be terminated by invoking > an OO

Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-08-28 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:07:51AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:34:54PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > If the USB HC is feeding too many such IRQ's it will be stuck. However, > > if you see that "uhub_read_port_status()" is called, the kernel is at least > > ru

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Available...

2012-08-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:41:03PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > * We have some "seed" tarballs of recently synced repo images around > somewhere. I'll see where they're available. But in a nutshell, you > do this: > /home/peter/svnsync$ fetch svnmirror-base-r123456.txz > /home/peter/svnsync$ tar

Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Available...

2012-08-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:41:49PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:37:04 -0500, Walter Hurry > wrote: > > >One thing (welcome, but puzzling) which surprised me was that my > >vboxguest.ko did *not* need to be recompiled. How did the upgrade manage > >that? > > FreeBSD has a

Re: Panic 9 .1-PRERELEASE on HP Servers

2012-08-13 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 06:25:17PM -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote: > http://www.pki2.com/bpbt2.JPG > > I removed the ipmi driver and rebooted the machine five times without > further problem. I won't be able to test the second machine until later > in the week. > I suspect that your trouble could

Re: Latest stable/8 broken for mozilla ports

2012-07-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 01:41:58PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > For both firefox and thunderbird I'm getting this: > > firefox > Fatal error 'locklevel <= 0' at line 98 in file > /frontier/svn/stable/8/lib/libthr/thread/thr_kern.c (errno = 2) > Redirecting call to abort() to mozalloc_abort > > Se

Re: local APIC error 0x40

2012-07-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:49:37PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote: > Running FreeBSD 8.3 -- and updating sources on a daily base and building > everything -- I found a new APIC/ACPI problem introduced in the past week. > > I have a Toshiba Satellite U205 with an Intel Core Duo (not a Core 2). It > used

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 fails to install in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux

2012-07-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:37:29PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > On 07/20/2012 08:56 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > >> On 07/20/2012 06:23 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > >>> Dear FreeBSD Developers, > &g

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 fails to install in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux

2012-07-20 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > On 07/20/2012 06:23 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > > Dear FreeBSD Developers, > > > > Trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 Beta 1 in qemu-kvm on Gentoo Linux fails > > before the kernel dmesg with 'kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled'. I > > am

Re: KMS on Sandy bridge error device_attach

2012-06-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:38:35PM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Konstantin Belousov > wrote: > > Ok, but you did not tried to load i915kms, at least the dmesg you posted > > lacks an indication. > > Actually, it did. i915kms was in loade

Re: KMS on Sandy bridge error device_attach

2012-06-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 09:25:40AM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov > wrote: > >> Thank you for your quick response. Output is attached. > >> This is probably one of the relatively rarely sold CPUs, so I might >

Re: KMS on Sandy bridge error device_attach

2012-06-22 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:28:29PM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote: > Hello Konstantin, Do not strip lists from Cc:, I am not your tech support. > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Konstantin Belousov > wrote: > >> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31260L @ 2.40GHz (2400.07-MHz K8-cla

Re: KMS on Sandy bridge error device_attach

2012-06-22 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:44:52PM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated my world to try kms which has recently been merged into > stable. However I get this when kldload'ing i915kms: > > drmn0: on vgapci0 > info: [drm] MSI enabled 1 message(s) > error: [drm:pid1295:drm_load] *ERR

Re: acpidump -dt broken in 9 stable

2012-06-18 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:32:53PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2012-06-16 08:34:45 -0400, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 09:57:45PM -0700, mnln.l4 wrote: > >> Just upgrade from 9.0 to 9 stabl

Re: acpidump -dt broken in 9 stable

2012-06-16 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 09:57:45PM -0700, mnln.l4 wrote: > Just upgrade from 9.0 to 9 stable. > > `acpidump -dt` shows error message "realpath tmp file: No such file or > directory" > > It is related to the recent change made to realpath(3) This was a bug/specific operation in acpidump relying o

Re: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-06-15 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:08:55PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > mmu_oea64.o:(.got+0x90): undefined reference to `elf32_nxstack' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /obj/powerpc.powerpc64/src/sys/LINT. > *** Error code 1 Should be fixed in r237150, sorry for the breakage. pgpeueXgUXlkL.pgp Descr

Re: i386 binaries on amd64: ldconfig problems

2012-05-31 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:28:42PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 31.05.2012 16:58, Konstantin Belousov writes: > > >> But actually I shouldn't have to use LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH. > >> I mean, it's ldconfig's job to configure the directories for > >>

Re: i386 binaries on amd64: ldconfig problems

2012-05-31 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:15:59PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Hi, > > I've recently migrated my workstation from i386 to amd64 > (finally, because I neeed to go beyond 4 GB RAM). The > transition went smoothly so far, except for one thing: > I need to use several old i386 binaries, which all w

Re: i386 -march=xxx behavior [Was: FreeBSD 8 i386 gptboot corrupt - SOLVED]

2012-05-11 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:37:10AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 09/05/2012 15:09 Alfred Bartsch said the following: > > Am 09.05.2012 12:42, schrieb Andriy Gapon: > >> on 09/05/2012 12:29 Alfred Bartsch said the following: > >>> This behavior is restricted to 32-bit servers (i386), all 64-bit >

Re: Restricting users from certain privileges

2012-04-28 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:29:58AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-04-28 09:50, Zenny wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > ... > >> try sudo from ports, security/sudo > > Thanks Daniel, but sudo gives all (not selective) root privileges to the > > user (admin

Re: Unable to build RELENG_9 (r234602)

2012-04-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 08:26:28AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-04-25 04:32, Alie Tan wrote: > > I got this compilation error for 9-STABLE > > > > -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality > > -Wno-unused-function -Wno-conversion -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-empty-bo

Re: kernel panic while detecting cpu in FreeBSD 9

2012-04-18 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:24:17AM -0400, Chad C wrote: > Updated the mainboard UEFI to latest version but am still getting the > same kernel page fault. > > I compiled "options DDB" and "options GDB" into the generic kernel. > After rebooting and entering DDB I get the following from various c

Re: kernel panic while detecting cpu in FreeBSD 9

2012-04-17 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:52:28PM -0400, Chad C wrote: > > Hello, > I posted to the FreeBSD forum and was told to seek help on the stable > mailing list. I recently build a new system and attempted to install > FreeBSD 9 amd64 using the dvd. Shortly after the boot loader menu while > the ker

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

2012-03-30 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:34:55PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/30/12 16:36, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > First, there _are_ relocations against text in the amd64 modules, but I > > suspect that your scripts do not detect this. Most likely, scripts look > > for DT_TEX

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

2012-03-30 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:11:29PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/30/12 15:46, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:42:22PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > >> On 03/30/12 15:07, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >>>> Is this a bug? > >>>

Re: Text relocations in kernel modules

2012-03-30 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:38:14PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > As a disclaimer, I would like to clarify that Gentoo/FreeBSD uses a > FreeBSD userland and that Gentoo/FreeBSD has nothing to do with Debian > GNU/kFreeBSD. People seem to think Gentoo/FreeBSD is related to Debian > GNU/kFreeBSD, which

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 - active plus inactive memory leak!?

2012-03-07 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote: > Thanks for your email, Chuck. > > > > Conversely, if a page *does not* occur in the resident > > > memory of any process, it must not occupy any space in the active + > > > inactive lists. > > > > Hmm...if a process gets swapped out

Re: [CFT] modular kernel config

2012-03-02 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:33:17PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Pavel Timofeev (from Thu, 1 Mar 2012 > 10:35:17 +0400): > > >I have just tried lastest configs and see following messages while > >kernel boot: > > > >Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project. > >Copyright (c) 1

Re: another panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-28 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 02:58:28AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Konstantin Belousov wrote > in <20120224150259.gv55...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>: > > ko> > > #19 0x000800abecfc in ?? () > ko> > > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) &

Re: another panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:33:36PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:45:58PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is another reproducible panic. This seems to happen only when > > top(1) is running for a lon

Re: another panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:45:58PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Hi, > > This is another reproducible panic. This seems to happen only when > top(1) is running for a long time (a sysctl() call for > CTL_KERN.KERN_PROC.KERN_PROC_PROC MIB triggered it). > > > pool.allbsd.org dumped core - se

Re: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

2012-02-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:52:12AM +0530, Desai, Kashyap wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Konstantin Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 12:45 AM > > To: Desai, Kashyap > > Cc: freebsd-s...@freebsd.

Re: panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:53:55PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:24:14 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:29:40AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > Hiroki Sato wrote: > >

Re: panic in 8.3-PRERELEASE

2012-02-22 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:29:40AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hiroki Sato wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just a report, but I got the following panic on an NFS server running > > 8.3-PRERELEASE: > > > > (from here) > > pool.allbsd.org dumped core - see /var/crash/vmcore.0 > > > > Tue Feb 21 10

Re: mpslsi0 : Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited

2012-02-22 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:36:42PM +0530, Desai, Kashyap wrote: > Hi, > > I am doing some code changes in mps dirver. While working on those changes, I > come to know about something which is new to me. > Some expert help is required to clarify my doubt. > > 1. When any irq is register with Free

Re: ZFS + nullfs + Linuxulator = panic?

2012-02-17 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:07:46PM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: > On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:09:27AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: > >> On Feb 14, 2012, at 7:47 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >> > >&

Re: ZFS + nullfs + Linuxulator = panic?

2012-02-16 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:09:27AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: > On Feb 14, 2012, at 7:47 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:38:18AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: > >> I have a problem with RELENG_8 (FreeBSD/amd64 running a GENERIC kernel, > >&g

Re: disk devices speed is ugly

2012-02-15 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:27:19AM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Scott Long wrote: > > > > > Any filesystem that uses bread/bwrite/cluster_read are already using the > > "generic caching subsystem" that you propose. This includes UDF, CD9660, > > MSDOS, NTFS,

Re: disk devices speed is ugly

2012-02-14 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:02:58AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Feb-13 08:28:21 -0500, Gary Palmer wrote: > >The filesystem is the *BEST* place to do caching. It knows what metadata > >is most effective to cache and what other data (e.g. file contents) doesn't > >need to be cached. > > A

Re: ZFS + nullfs + Linuxulator = panic?

2012-02-14 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:38:18AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: > I have a problem with RELENG_8 (FreeBSD/amd64 running a GENERIC kernel, last > built 2012-02-08). It will panic during the daily periodic scripts that run > at 3am. Here is the most recent panic message: > > Fatal trap 9: general p

Re: 9-stable from i386 to amd64

2012-02-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:02:07AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Feb 10), Randy Bush said: > > is there a recipe for moving from i386 to amd64? > > > > on a very remote system, i made the migration from 7.4 to 8.2 to 9.0, all > > 32-bit. it was done with repeated > > > > ma

Re: FreeBSD 9: Group quotas increase but don't decrease automatically

2012-02-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 07:30:54PM +0700, Adam Strohl wrote: > I'm running FreeBSD 9 on a number of systems and finally decided to take > advantage of the quota system to enforce limits on my users. > > No real issues setting it all up aside from finding that > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.I

Re: FreeBSD 6-STABLE freezing up ...

2006-06-22 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:12:22PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > 'k, I was thinking / hoping it was just maxpipekva causing me issues, but > apparently that isn't it ... it just froze up again with only 40 out of > 60M of allocated space used: > > == > kern.ipc.

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

2006-06-09 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 07:34:39PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Since i don't have a serial console available and I'm not that > knowledgeable with debuggers, would providing a fast download link to a > core dump (I'm sure the dump would compress very well) be useful to > anyone? Would someone b

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

2006-06-06 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:22:34PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > The hangs are mostly related to snapshots. It would be better to > update to the latest RELENG_6. I need to clarify this no so wise statement made at the end of the day. It is believed that Tor Egge fixed all known ca

Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE

2006-06-06 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:49:04PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: > > > >>Hi! > >> > >>On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:35:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > >> > >>6.1-STABLE after 6.1-RELEASE is releases. So I think you may want > >>> > >>>If you use

Re: [patch, try 1] Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-06-01 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:06:44AM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > Hello! > > On Thu, 25 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > KASSERT(!(debug_mpsafenet == 1 && mtx_owned(&Giant)), > > ("nfssvc_nfsd(): debug.mpsaf

Re: LOR in vnode interlock and system map

2006-05-29 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 12:09:24AM +0200, V??clav Haisman wrote: > See attached file. The kernel is todays CVS 6.1. > > -- > Vaclav Haisman > > > May 28 19:16:55 logout kernel: lock order reversal: > May 28 19:16:55 logout kernel: 1st 0xc3d4bb1c vnode interlock (vnode > interlock) @ /usr/src/s

[patch, try 1] Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:19:26AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:48:53PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote: > > > So what's changed at that delta, under the one that works vfs_lookup.c is: > > > > Edit src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c > > Add delta 1.80.2.6 2006.03.31.07.39.24 kr

Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-23 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote: > On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote: > >> > >>Hello All, > >> > >> I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the > >5.x > >

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:22:34PM -0400, m m wrote: > n 5/21/06, Konstantin Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > >> >0x in ?? () > >> >(gdb) bt > >> >#0 0x in ??

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:13:35PM -0400, m m wrote: > Any hints on this available? Suggestions, more info, anything else? > > On 5/15/06, m m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 5/14/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 > >> "m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-16 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:58:32PM -0400, m m wrote: > On 5/14/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 > >"m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I am writing in regard to PR at > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F59552 . I am > >>

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-07 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:29:08PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > KB> > I'm running RELENG_6 with hand-merged sys/ufs/ffs changes from 1 to 7 > May. > > KB> It would be great to show the patchset. Also note t

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-07 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:59:33PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > KB> > Alas, it is locked again: > KB> > > KB> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ps axlww | grep snap > KB> > 032 0 0 -4

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-07 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:26:55PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > DM> KK> > Also, as an FYI, several quota-related snapshot fixes went into CVS > in the > DM> KK> > last 24-48 hours. Once they've settled for a few weeks, and > assuming they

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-05 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:59:33PM -0700, David Kirchner wrote: > Here's how to reproduce the snapshot deadlock I'm seeing, with 6.1-RC2 > cvsup'd as of 5 or 6 hours ago: > > 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=/usr/bigfile bs=1024 seek=209715200 count=0 > 2) mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /usr/bigfile > 3) bsdlabel -

Re: 6.1-RC panic: mutex Giant not owned at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2037

2006-05-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:01:37PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > Just had the following panic on 6.1-RC from source current as of 24 > hours ago: > > db> ex/s *panicstr > buf.1: mutex Giant not owned at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2037 > db> tr > Tracing pid 6158 tid 100120 td 0xc64e4180 > kdb_

<    1   2   3   4