12.2 release, blacklistd with ipfw gives error

2020-11-02 Thread Kris von Mach via freebsd-stable
Hello, I've upgraded a working blacklistd with ipfw server from 12.1 to 12.2 and now it gives the following error: blacklistd[51583]: getnum: /etc/blacklistd.conf, 22: Bad number for service [] My config: rc.conf: blacklistd_enable="YES" # activates

Re: em performs worse than igb (latency wise) in 12?

2019-04-09 Thread Kris von Mach
On 4/7/2019 6:49 AM, Matthew Macy wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 1:23 PM Michael Butler wrote: I'd be interested to see if substituting the port net/intel-em-kmod has any effect on the issue, I would as well. igb, em, and lem are all the same driver in 12. This makes maintenance a lot easier.

Re: em performs worse than igb (latency wise) in 12?

2019-04-06 Thread Kris von Mach
On 4/6/2019 2:56 AM, Pete French wrote: Something odd going on there there - I am using 12-STABLE and I have igb just fine, and it attaches to the same hardware that 11 did: I ran apache bench, and I got a result of 100 requests/sec on 12-STABLE vs 16,000 requests/sec on 11-STABLE. So somethin

Re: em performs worse than igb (latency wise) in 12?

2019-04-05 Thread Kris von Mach
On 4/6/2019 2:56 AM, Pete French wrote: Something odd going on there there - I am using 12-STABLE and I have igb just fine, and it attaches to the same hardware that 11 did: It does work in 12, throughput is great, just that the latency is higher than 11. igb0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 o

em performs worse than igb (latency wise) in 12?

2019-04-05 Thread Kris von Mach
Hello, I've upgraded from Stable 11 to Stable 12, and noticed that igb has been removed and is now part of em driver. However, the performance seems a lot worse. This is using HP 366FLR which is just HP's version of Intel i350 I believe. I've tried incorporating the sysctl settings I used in