Re: Lockups with -Stable on Athlon

2001-05-07 Thread Lamont Granquist
I've got a K7T900 in a Asus K7M (100MHz FSB) and 4.3 works fine. I keep getting errors about not being able to build some rc4 file when i do a buildkernel, but that's probably not hardware related... On Mon, 7 May 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > Odd. What sort of LISP environment are you running

fat32 slower than dogshit?

2001-05-11 Thread Lamont Granquist
Well, i think it is, i'm actually not too sure exactly how fast dogshit is in the first place. But in doing a simple untar on a fat32 partition using both 4-stable a couple days after release and a recently updated 4-stable as of yesterday (5/10) it goes about 20-30 times slower than an untar on

ath0 issue

2006-11-11 Thread Lamont Granquist
i've got an ath0 issue similar to this one: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-July/027050.html this is on 6.2-PRERELEASE from Nov 3 FreeBSD warez.scriptkiddie.org 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Nov 3 09:00:14 PST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src

Re: ath0 issue

2006-11-12 Thread Lamont Granquist
i did the same thing with running: while(1) echo foo sleep 1 end in a window ssh'd into the machine with the ath0 driver, but with the kernel recompiled with ATH_DEBUG and sysctl dev.ath.0.debug=0x -- there should be packets sent every second while doing this. i saw the same behav

Re: ath0 issue

2006-11-12 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Sam Leffler wrote: If tx stops in ap mode you need to figure out whether the h/w tx q is stalled or something else "above" is blocking outbound traffic. The usual things to check are: 1. are there resources in the driver to send a packet (e.g. buffers on the queue); if th

Re: ath0 issue

2006-11-28 Thread Lamont Granquist
few hours ago -- i haven't tried -current On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Lamont Granquist wrote: On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Sam Leffler wrote: Snapshots are rarely useful; try running athstats 1 and correlate what you see with pauses. Another possible reason for deferred operation is something else in the

Re: ath0 issue

2006-11-28 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Sam Leffler wrote: Snapshots are rarely useful; try running athstats 1 and correlate what you see with pauses. Another possible reason for deferred operation is something else in the system blocking the taskq threads; that's a bit trickier to diagnose. also, "athtest 1"

Re: ath0 issue

2006-11-28 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Sam Leffler wrote: Snapshots are rarely useful; try running athstats 1 and correlate what you see with pauses. Another possible reason for deferred operation is something else in the system blocking the taskq threads; that's a bit trickier to diagnose. I threw in some pr

Re: ath0 issue

2006-11-29 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Sam Leffler wrote: Is there some reason you are not just sniffing the air? Assuming packets are being deferred because the medium is busy you might see a reason. Otherwise it appears (though it's impossible to tell from what you've shown so far) that the packets are hande

Re: ath0 issue

2006-12-04 Thread Lamont Granquist
ta's in ps mode ath0: [00:18:de:85:d0:5e] power save mode off, 0 sta's in ps mode ath0: [00:18:de:85:d0:5e] power save mode on, 1 sta's in ps mode ath0: [00:18:de:85:d0:5e] power save mode off, 0 sta's in ps mode ping times are all now consistantly under a ms and throughput it g

Re: ath0 timeout problem - again

2006-12-29 Thread Lamont Granquist
check this message: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-December/031216.html run "/usr/src/tools/tools/net80211/wlandebug/wlandebug -i ath0 power" and see if one of the hosts on your wlan has powersaving turned on. "stops forever" was not one of my symptoms though, so your

Re: Regarding New FreeBSD BenchMark From Sysadmin Mag (left out afiew tuning options)

2001-07-13 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Bruce Burden wrote: > > Some SCSI drive manufacturers ship their drives > > with WCE enabled. Other SCSI drive manufacturers, who are more > > concerned with data integrity as opposed to performance figures, will > > ship their drives with WCE disabled. >

Re: is "stable" "stable"?

2001-07-23 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, A. L. Meyers wrote: > It seems to me that it would be in the very best interest of > FreeBSD to apply whatever quality controls are appropriate to > ensure that "stable" means what it says. You're checking out the head of a development tree. It will never be stable in your

Re: Watching DVD's in -stable

2001-07-28 Thread Lamont Granquist
I just tried xine 0.4.3 from ports with captain_css 0.1.2 and it failed to work. Tried again with xine 0.5.0.rc2 and it also failed to work. I'm runing a post-4.3 cvsup on a K7M+K7T/900 with creative labs dxr3s DVD-CDROM and Asus TNT2 ultra and Monster MX300 (Aureal Vortex). It just freezes wh

Re: NTPD in upcoming release?

2001-08-09 Thread Lamont Granquist
Is 5.0 going to let ntpd run without root permissions? Having ntpd running as root scares the living fuck out of me since it lends itself to attacks involving single packets and spoofed source addresses (and in particular spoofing the tier 1 and 2 time daemon source addresses to bypass firewall

loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1

2001-09-22 Thread Lamont Granquist
All my 4.3 and 4.4 boxen have problems with the only lookback address being valid is 127.0.0.1 instead of the entire /8. My ifconfig looks like: lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff0

Recovering from clobbered boot manager?

2001-10-18 Thread Lamont Granquist
So, whats the easist way to recover from a clobbered boot manager in FreeBSD? I kind of naively assumed that this would be easy to do from an installation CDROM (4.3-RELEASE) but I failed to get it to work. Going Configure->Fdisk in sysinstall didn't work for me. To Unsubscribe: send mail to

UDP jail bug patch (was Re: (PATCH) Re: jail bug with ircd-hybridin_pcbconnect()?)

2002-03-25 Thread Lamont Granquist
I previously posted a patch to fix this UDP-in-jail bug which I believe may have compromised the security of the jail. This patch shouldn't do that. It: 1. preserves the jail check in in_pcbconnect() 2. preserves the laddr+lport check in the beginning of in_pcbbind() 3. modifies no code out

Re: Build sequence (was Re: mergemaster theory (was: Re:/etc/defaults/rc.conf theory) )

2002-04-30 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Mike Meyer wrote: > What's missed here is that running an old kernel and a new userland is > more likely to screw things up. In fact this is now broken if you try to build -current on a -stable box. You can't run the -current userland on a -stable kernel to do an install an