Hello,
only real arguments (passed with command) are taken into account,
when I edit .MAKEFLAGS (makefile or /etc/make.conf) there is a new .MAKEFLAGS
but there no expected effects.
You can test this with the -dA option, and with the following ./makefile
content (extract):
-
.MAKEFLAGS+= -dA
d
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:07:42PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 16:34:25 +0200
> > From: Mathieu Prevot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a RELENG_6/AMD64 with an AMD64X2 cpu
Hello,
sysinstall installed successfully a smp generic kernel (3800+)..
Mathieu
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello,
I have a RELENG_6/AMD64 with an AMD64X2 cpu, 1GB of memory, 512MB swap.
I remarked that when I run 2 simulation program [1], sometimes, one of them
run one or several of its threads [2] very slowly, but sometimes, it doesn't
occur.
I remarked that is doesn't depend on SMP/UP, ULE/4BSD, i38
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:32:05AM +, Gary Palmer wrote:
> Mathieu Prevot wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I remarked something I don't understand. I have a usb mouse, and if I
> >just have usbd_enable="YES" and moused_enable="NO" in rc.conf I
Hello,
I remarked something I don't understand. I have a usb mouse, and if I
just have usbd_enable="YES" and moused_enable="NO" in rc.conf I can have a
functionnal mouse after boot. If I go to single-user mode from multi-user
mode and then back to multi-user mode with ^d, I don't have the process
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 12:50:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> --->>>
> w -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror ata_if.c
> cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
> -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpo
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:07:02AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > the utility time -- time command execution doesn't work as expected:
> >
> > time -h ls
>
> time is built into some shells. You need to get the right
> version of time.
>
> Use a backslash to
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:38:58PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Mathieu Prevot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-21 13:19 +0100]:
> > the utility time -- time command execution doesn't work as expected:
> >
> > time -h ls
> >
> > give:
> >
Hello,
the utility time -- time command execution doesn't work as expected:
time -h ls
give:
-h: Command not found.
0.000u 0.000s 0:00.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
I have:
6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #29: Sat Feb 18 02:31:01 CET 2006 amd64
--
MP
__
Le 13 févr. 06 à 14:15, Gerard Milhaud a écrit :
J. Buck Caldwell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
First don't blame me for cross-posting on stable and x11 lists
but both seem
relevant for my problem.
I'm tracking 6-STABLE. Since one week, I can't use my computer
under
Le 15 janv. 06 à 10:47, Markus Trippelsdorf a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:30:33AM +0100, Mathieu Prevot wrote:
Hi
I don't have seen such possibility in archives, google, and /usr/src/
makefile.inc1
These libraries are built (buildworld) even if I don't have COMPAT32
etc in m
Hi
I don't have seen such possibility in archives, google, and /usr/src/
makefile.inc1
These libraries are built (buildworld) even if I don't have COMPAT32
etc in my KERNCONF file.
So: how may I gain time without building 32bit libraries?
MP
___
f
I have a machine running FreeBSD 5.4 with 512MB RAM. Now I want to
install an extra RAM-module. Do I have to do something in my
configuration, or is it "plug-and-play"?
There is nothing to do. There is no plug and play for RAM. It just
needs the right RAM module.
MP
_
Hi all!
First, I appreciate very much freebsd that I use since nearly one year
for scientific computation (simulation etc), writing C - sometimes
threaded - programs, on mono and multi-core/CPU stations.
I would like to autologin in *only one* ttyv (eg ttyv1) and then launch
X with xinit manu
15 matches
Mail list logo
