On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Peter C. Lai wrote:
> On 2010-02-09 05:32:02PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> One similar product that does seem to work well is iLO, available on
>>> HP/Compaq hardware.
>>
>> I've heard great things about that.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
>
> On 27 May 2009, at 22:44, Kevin Day wrote:
>
>> tries to do a chflags on it, fails because ZFS doesn't support flags
>
>
> are the pools already upgraded to v13 ? if not please do so with zpool
> upgrade -a
>
> Then in single user mod
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile it on 6.2 and get
> make: don't know how to make cryptodev_if.h. Stop
>
> ???
> where is this file?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
Have you applied the 6.2 patch included in the latest tgz that Patri
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Patrick Lamaizière
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:41:35 +0200,
> Patrick Lamaizière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>> I'm trying to port the glxsb driver from OpenBSD to FreeBSD 7-STABLE
>> (via the NetBSD port).
>> " The glxsb driver
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Steven Hartland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Erik Stian Tefre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Steven Hartland wrote:
> >> When booting a default kernel e.g. standard install cd the KVM over LAN
> >> keyboard on Supermicro's
Any ideas on how to do "make release" in jail?
It seems that it needs to mount devfs which is not possible inside a jail.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
zen wrote:
> hi,
> recently i tried to update my fresh install machine of 6.2RELEASE to
> 6.2STABLE,
> but alway failed with these error msgs:
>
> proxy2# /usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/stable-supfile
> Parsing supfile "/etc/stable-supfile"
> Conne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Nuennerich wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> we've got a Asus DRW-1814BLT here which is not recognized by 6.2. I
> can't find it neither in dmesg nor in atacontrol. The Bios detects it
> fine and even Linux. This writer is SATA:
>
> http://www.asus.com/pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niki Denev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed something very interesing while using a ural(4) usb wifi device.
>
> When i plug the usb device, and there is absolutely no network activity,
> exactly
> after five minutes th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've noticed something very interesing while using a ural(4) usb wifi device.
When i plug the usb device, and there is absolutely no network activity, exactly
after five minutes the device deassociates from the access point.
I've put some deb
On Friday 10 March 2006 11:07, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Mornin'
>
> > After not having much success with the hptmv driver for highpoint's
> > rocketraid 1820A, I'm wondering if other folks have had good luck with
> > any SATA RAID cards with at least 6 ports... Is there a SATA RAID card
> > with
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:15, Niki Denev wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:03, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Thanks, I forgot about this. You'll need these patches too:
> > >
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/uf
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:03, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Thanks, I forgot about this. You'll need these patches too:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c.diff?r1
> >=1.77&r2=1.78
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 09:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:40:37AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> > Anyway, I'll discuss with my colleagues and we'll see if we want to take
> > the risk.
>
> Thanks, it would be a big help if you're willing to try.
>
> Kris
I'm jumpin
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:59, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:55:34AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:48, you wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:36 +0200,
> > >
> > > N
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:59, you wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:40:36AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm running a 6.1-PRE machine
>
> So why haven't you tested the quota patch I posted, since you posted a
> month ago about quota
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:48, you wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:36 +0200,
>
> Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any ideas? Probably i'm doing something wrong, but can't see it yet...
>
> Tri it.
>
> DIR=/.snap
> nice sh
Hello,
I'm running a 6.1-PRE machine and have created the following
scripts called from /etc/crontab :
0 0 * * * root/usr/local/sbin/make_snapshot.sh
15 0 * * * root
/usr/local/sbin/purge_snapshot.sh
make_snapshot.sh :
#!/bin/sh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niki Denev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on one 6.1-PRERELEASE box i found that pf.conf's manual page
> mentions rtlabels :
>
[...]
Filed as PR docs/93590
- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
on one 6.1-PRERELEASE box i found that pf.conf's manual page
mentions rtlabels :
routeAny address whose associated route has label
. See route(4) and route(8).
But it seems that this is OpenBSD specific
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Atanas wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav said the following on 02/15/06 23:35:
>> David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I did once mail des@ to ask him if he'd mind me changing the default
>>> login timeout for sshd to be (say) 5 minutes rather than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 09:41:40PM -0600, Robert Uzzi wrote:
[...]
>>
> How did you disable ccache? If you did it by setting NOCCACHE it doesn't
> really work. Comment out the ccache stuff completely from /etc/make.conf
> and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua Coombs wrote:
> Just got a dual Opteron system to play with amd64 builds of FreeBSD.
> Poking around to see how it behaived, I initially tossed FreeBSD 4.11 on
> it, and was surprised to see a dump of the scsi controller state at the
> end of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 05:07:56PM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
>> On Thursday 26 January 2006 10:40, Niki Denev wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> After i disabled option QUOTA in both my default kernel config
>>
On Thursday 26 January 2006 10:40, Niki Denev wrote:
>
[...]
After i disabled option QUOTA in both my default kernel config
and the one i compiled with the debugging options i was unable
to reproduce the deadlock again. (i hope it stays that way :) )
This, together with the report in my previ
On Thursday 26 January 2006 10:54, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-26 10:50 +0200]:
> > to the debugger with BREAK (~#) i get this on the screen :
> > The following connections are open:
> > #0 client-session (t4 r0 i0/0 o0/0 fd 4/
debugger on the serial console.
i have this added to my kernel conf :
options BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER
options KDB
options DDB
and this in /boot/loadaer.conf :
console=comconsole
Maybe the fact that there is physically attached keyboard interferes with the
serial console?
Regards,
Niki Denev
) at 0x800684b3c
*** error reading from address e3e8 ***
I hope this is sufficient.
P.S. Sorry no crashdump, because i'm running on gmirror-ed gstripe,
maybe i can try later to attach another disk to the machine to use it
only for c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
>>> I've just upraded my Xorg port to the latest relase 6.9,
>>> and begin to get this when i start X :
>>>
>>> agp0: binding memory at bad offset 0
>>> error: [drm:pid610:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niki Denev wrote:
>
[...]
I received off the list suggestion to try a patch from -CURRENT for
vfs_lookup.c. I think that this patch is already commited to -STABLE,
and so i rebuilt my kernel and world again today, but the problem is
still here.
Hello,
I've just upraded my Xorg port to the latest relase 6.9,
and begin to get this when i start X :
agp0: binding memory at bad offset 0
error: [drm:pid610:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without lock
held
error: [drm:pid610:drm_unlock] *ERROR* Process 610 using kernel context 0
Hello,
I'm experiencing some problems with a 6.0-STABLE machine,
cvsupped and rebuilt yesterday.
I'm not sure that the problem is related to this last update, because
this machine is not very loaded currently.
The machine is with dual opteron mb from Supermicro,
with two Opteron 244s and 4GB of D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Willenberger wrote:
> I hope this is the appropriate mailing list for this question, if not
> please redirect me as needed.
>
> My goal is to create a filesystem consisting of a striped raid array
> over 3 mirror raid arrays that would encompass
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 16:02, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> I have set hidessid option to an Intersil PRISM 2.5 based cart, acting
> as hostap, and the ssid stills gets broadcasted, aparently. Other
> FreeBSD systems and the Windows software supplied by the vendor can find
> the SSID while scanni
Hi all,
I'm setting up a UPS on one machine,
and the ups daemon (nut) works as user "upsd".
To make it work properly i have added in devfs.rules the
following :
permttyd0 0660
own ttyd0 upsd:upsd
But it still does not work because ttyd0.init and ttyd0.lock
are still owned by root.
I'
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 20:18, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:55 am, Niki Denev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > From some time in 6.0 and -current top(1) shows by default also the
> > kernel threads.
> > But the top(1) manual page still s
Hello,
From some time in 6.0 and -current top(1) shows by default also the kernel
threads.
But the top(1) manual page still says that the default behaviour is NOT to
show them.
Maybe something like this will be enough:
--- usr.bin/top/top.local.1 Fri Jul 18 02:56:39 2003
+++ usr.bin/top/to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niki Denev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a small machine setup to act as simple network gateway.
> I have one wireless and one wired interfaces without IP configuration
> on them, and they are added as if_bridge(4) members.
> Wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have a small machine setup to act as simple network gateway.
I have one wireless and one wired interfaces without IP configuration
on them, and they are added as if_bridge(4) members.
When i issue arp -na command on the machine i get this:
?
Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The University where i work recent acquire a new server, i install
> FreeBSD 6.0 and update for STABLE yestarday,
> in dmesg i see this messages""
>
>
> ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred.
>
>
I've had similar problems with Dual channel U320 adapt
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Giovanni P. Tirloni wrote:
>
>> Try this,
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/book.html#CALCRU-NEGATIVE
>
>
> Thank you. I must admit that I missed this. Unfortunately all the
> suggestions in this FAQ seem to be out of date - none of the suggested
Niki Denev wrote:
> Joseph Koshy wrote:
>
>>>dmesg and output of kern.timecounter sysctl can be found here :
>>
>>
>>Changing your timecounter to "i8254" may help.
>>
>>Bug 43491 and 72338 seem to be related:
>>
>> http://www.f
Joseph Koshy wrote:
>>dmesg and output of kern.timecounter sysctl can be found here :
>
>
> Changing your timecounter to "i8254" may help.
>
> Bug 43491 and 72338 seem to be related:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72338
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=43491
>
>
Niki Denev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently upgraded my server from 5.4-STABLE to 6.0-RC1
> and shortly after that i began to see these messages in my dmesg:
>
> calcru: runtime went backwards from 1488581 usec to 1488580 usec for pid
> 65583 (mpsnmp)
[snip]
dmesg and
Hi,
I've recently upgraded my server from 5.4-STABLE to 6.0-RC1
and shortly after that i began to see these messages in my dmesg:
calcru: runtime went backwards from 1488581 usec to 1488580 usec for pid
65583 (mpsnmp)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 12674015 usec to 12674008 usec for
pid 9818
This thread seems to relate to the same problem in
dfbsd :
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2005-03/msg00101.html
I think that this should be fixed, the man page did not mentions
EOPNOTSUPP and this can lead to further confusion because it seems
that HP-UX for example sets errno to
Niki Denev wrote:
>
>
> I get the same behaviour also with 6.0-RC1 (cvsupped an hour ago)
>
Ok,
In this awful piece of code created for testing purposes
if i set FILETOSEND to local file it works ok,
but if the file is located on smbfs sendfile returns "Operation
not supported
Niki Denev wrote:
> David G. Lawrence wrote:
>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>I seem to have a problem serving files with
>>>lighttpd from non local (smbfs) filesystem.
>>>Lighttpd tries to use sendfile(2) but, it returns
>>>with -1 and errno &quo
David G. Lawrence wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>I seem to have a problem serving files with
>>lighttpd from non local (smbfs) filesystem.
>>Lighttpd tries to use sendfile(2) but, it returns
>>with -1 and errno "Operation not supported",
>>but i can't find this error in the documented errors
>>on the manpage
Hello,
I seem to have a problem serving files with
lighttpd from non local (smbfs) filesystem.
Lighttpd tries to use sendfile(2) but, it returns
with -1 and errno "Operation not supported",
but i can't find this error in the documented errors
on the manpage.
Forcing lighttpd to not use sendfile fi
Tomas Randa wrote:
Hi,
I Am running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun May 8 18:23:40 CEST
2005 with Adaptec 29320 or 2930U2 controller and with heavy load on SCSI
I have the following problems ending with system freeze. Have anybody
some opinion where could be problem?
Hi,
I have s
Luke Crawford wrote:
>> disabling background fsck while continuing to run soft updates
>> will make little difference.
>>
>> Personally, I would recommend that you keep your disk mount
>> configuration as it is, and that you buy a UPS.
>>
Well, i surely need an UPS, that's out of question,
but
Hello,
I want just to share my last experience with the combination of
power failure + background fsck. After the power returned and the
machine booted, it sheduled background fsck after 60 seconds, but
at this point most of the services were already started, and some of them
seemed to rely on f
Hello,
Recently while testing a program on a 5.3-STABLE machine
with dual Athlon MP 2200+ (SMP enabled), i made a mistake
and the program basicaly became a fork() bomb.
It flooded my dmesg and messages with these messages (which is normal):
Jan 29 18:13:20 tormentor kernel: maxproc limit exceeded b
54 matches
Mail list logo
